Not Everything Is Written In Stone. . .

The cultivation of calm or tranquility and the development of concentration
User avatar
Ben
Posts: 18438
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
Location: kanamaluka

Re: Not Everything Is Written In Stone. . .

Post by Ben »

legolas,
legolas wrote: I dont have an answer, open up tilt enjoy life enjoy the Dhamma. you to ben.
This ad hominem stays with you.
“No lists of things to be done. The day providential to itself. The hour. There is no later. This is later. All things of grace and beauty such that one holds them to one's heart have a common provenance in pain. Their birth in grief and ashes.”
- Cormac McCarthy, The Road

Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.
- Sutta Nipata 3.725

Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global ReliefUNHCR

e: [email protected]..
User avatar
legolas
Posts: 235
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:58 am

Re: Not Everything Is Written In Stone. . .

Post by legolas »

tiltbillings wrote:And what tradition might those be.

That speaks more of you than anything else.


You feel qualified to make this judgement about me? You know nothing about me and my practice. Shame on you.
I will definitely not be drawn into a discussion on this tradition or that tradition and although I may have raised this subject, I am now being chicken and will decline to answer. :sage:

I think what speaks volumes of you is your editing of my post. Where was my tongue in cheek :tongue: after the "Yes"? Bearing this in mind my call to enjoy life and not to take things to seriously stands firm. Of course "Yes" is no answer but "Yes" :tongue: does in fact speak volumes of my character and disposition.
As for knowing nothing about you or your practice, this is true I only know you by your posts contents as is the same for me.
User avatar
tiltbillings
Posts: 23046
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am

Re: Not Everything Is Written In Stone. . .

Post by tiltbillings »

legolas wrote:
tiltbillings wrote:And what tradition might those be.

That speaks more of you than anything else.


You feel qualified to make this judgement about me? You know nothing about me and my practice. Shame on you.
I will definitely not be drawn into a discussion on this tradition or that tradition and although I may have raised this subject, I am now being chicken and will decline to answer.
But you seem to think slandering other traditions by innuendo is okay. You are constantly taking pokes at the naughty, grim vipassana traditions. It would far more honest for you to point to whatever tradition you think is missing the boat so there can be an honest discussion. You have made, over time here, a number of negative comments concerning vipassana traditions, yet to be named, but I have yet to see from you a straightforward discussion of what you find so problematic.
I think what speaks volumes of you is your editing of my post. Where was my tongue in cheek :tongue: after the "Yes"? Bearing this in mind my call to enjoy life and not to take things to seriously stands firm. Of course "Yes" is no answer but "Yes" :tongue: does in fact speak volumes of my character and disposition.
As for knowing nothing about you or your practice, this is true I only know you by your posts contents as is the same for me.
Your first name calling statement - "ninnies" - had no dumb-assed emoticon, and I suspect it reflects your actual feelings about those who disagree with your point of view. And what exactly do those emoticons mean? They are supposed excuse intemperate language? :tongue: is not tongue-in-cheek. It is sticking one's tongue out.
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12

This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.

“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
User avatar
legolas
Posts: 235
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:58 am

Re: Not Everything Is Written In Stone. . .

Post by legolas »

I am sorry tilt if you found my "ninnie" intemperate language. I do apologise.

As far as an "honest discussion" goes about this or that tradition or technique, I have observed that they usually become vitriolic rather than honest. So I will decline your offer.

However you are right in that if I refuse to discuss the different vipassana traditions then I should not take shots at them. Having said that, is it not the Buddha's Dhamma that is up for discussion and not any particular sect of the Sangha. I will reserve my comments to how I perceive differing practices and their relevance to the Buddha's words.

BTW Your comment "I suspect it reflects your actual feelings about those who disagree with your point of view" is a little bit like what you chastised me for. You dont know me but you appear to know my feelings. Is this vipassana from afar :lol: ( this is an emoticon that signifies that it was a joke)
Last edited by legolas on Wed Sep 29, 2010 2:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
tiltbillings
Posts: 23046
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am

Re: Not Everything Is Written In Stone. . .

Post by tiltbillings »

legolas wrote:I am sorry tilt if you found my "ninnie" intemperate language. I do apologise.

As far as an "honest discussion" goes about this or that tradition or technique, I have observed that they usually become vitriolic rather than honest. So I will decline your offer.

However you are right in that if I refuse to discuss the different vipassana traditions then I should not take shots at them. Having said that, is it not the Buddha's Dhamma that is up for discussion and not any particular sect of the Sangha. I will reserve my comments to how I perceive differing practices and their relevance to the Buddha's words.
What is sad about this is you seem very unwilling to learn from the vipassana people. You might actually have it quite wrong about vipassana, be it the U Ba Khin or Mahasi Saydaw traditions.
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12

This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.

“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
User avatar
tiltbillings
Posts: 23046
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am

Re: Not Everything Is Written In Stone. . .

Post by tiltbillings »

legolas wrote:
BTW Your comment "I suspect it reflects your actual feelings about those who disagree with your point of view" is a little bit like what you chastised me for. You dont know me but you appear to know my feelings. Is this vipassana from afar :lol: ( this is an emoticon that signifies that it was a joke)
You are the one who put the statement out there. I am not to take what you write as it is written? Makes for difficulty in understanding. As far as a joke is concerned, one can make very biting comments in the guise of a joke.
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12

This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.

“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
User avatar
legolas
Posts: 235
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:58 am

Re: Not Everything Is Written In Stone. . .

Post by legolas »

tiltbillings wrote:
legolas wrote:I am sorry tilt if you found my "ninnie" intemperate language. I do apologise.

As far as an "honest discussion" goes about this or that tradition or technique, I have observed that they usually become vitriolic rather than honest. So I will decline your offer.

However you are right in that if I refuse to discuss the different vipassana traditions then I should not take shots at them. Having said that, is it not the Buddha's Dhamma that is up for discussion and not any particular sect of the Sangha. I will reserve my comments to how I perceive differing practices and their relevance to the Buddha's words.
What is sad about this is you seem very unwilling to learn from the vipassana people. You might actually have it quite wrong about vipassana, be it the U Ba Khin or Mahasi Saydaw traditions.
I respect your concern and am always willing to accept that there are certain elements within the traditions you mentioned as being very beneficial and valid. However I have actually been there and done that, it just did'nt cut the mustard for me personally and I felt that there was something missing. Having now actually read the suttas and listened/learned from other teachers, I am actually happy in my Dhamma practice.
User avatar
legolas
Posts: 235
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:58 am

Re: Not Everything Is Written In Stone. . .

Post by legolas »

tiltbillings wrote:
legolas wrote:
BTW Your comment "I suspect it reflects your actual feelings about those who disagree with your point of view" is a little bit like what you chastised me for. You dont know me but you appear to know my feelings. Is this vipassana from afar :lol: ( this is an emoticon that signifies that it was a joke)
You are the one who put the statement out there. I am not to take what you write as it is written? Makes for difficulty in understanding. As far as a joke is concerned, one can make very biting comments in the guise of a joke.
Thats a shame, I thought it was pretty witty joke, with only a little bite.
User avatar
tiltbillings
Posts: 23046
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am

Re: Not Everything Is Written In Stone. . .

Post by tiltbillings »

legolas wrote:
I respect your concern and am always willing to accept that there are certain elements within the traditions you mentioned as being very beneficial and valid. However I have actually been there and done that, it just did'nt cut the mustard for me personally and I felt that there was something missing.
And for me jhana practice, while interesting, was more of a distraction. Certainly not an absolute necessity for practice or awakening, unless one is talking about something such as the vipassana jhanas, but then we are still within the framework of vipassana.
Having now actually read the suttas and listened/learned from other teachers, I am actually happy in my Dhamma practice.
It is good that you are happy in your practice, but having actually read the suttas and worked with a number of teachers, I find vipassana is a perfectly legitimate way of practice, and it a practice that has lessened my suffering, allowing me to deal with life as it is more effectively, which is a joy in itself.

My only gripe about the jhana-wallahs is that there is a tendency among them to be awfully strident in their advocacy of their point of view over all others. I wonder why that is.
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12

This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.

“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
User avatar
legolas
Posts: 235
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:58 am

Re: Not Everything Is Written In Stone. . .

Post by legolas »

tiltbillings wrote:It is good that you are happy in your practice, but having actually read the suttas and worked with a number of teachers, I find vipassana is a perfectly legitimate way of practice, and it a practice that has lessened my suffering, allowing me to deal with life as it is more effectively, which is a joy in itself.

My only gripe about the jhana-wallahs is that there is a tendency among them to be awfully strident in their advocacy of their point of view over all others. I wonder why that is.
I was actually enjoying your post and then you go and ruin it with "jhana-wallahs". surely this would refer to the Buddha who dwelt in Jhana whenever possible. If I am to curtail my swipes at vipassana-wallahs it has to be reciprocated. As far as being "strident in their advocacy" it is just our natural exuberance of wanting to share.
User avatar
manas
Posts: 2678
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:04 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Not Everything Is Written In Stone. . .

Post by manas »

My thanks to Vepacitta and IanAnd for their informative replies. (from a bit earlier...it's moving fast in here). I found the sutta references very helpful.

Once again I'm remembering that the Buddha gave teachings with regards to time and place, as well as the capability of the listener. There actually is a sutta where he says "Be yoked to internal pleasantness..." but I just can't find it at present. There must have been a particular reason he said that at that time.
To the Buddha-refuge i go; to the Dhamma-refuge i go; to the Sangha-refuge i go.
User avatar
bodom
Posts: 7216
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 6:18 pm
Location: San Antonio, Texas

Re: Not Everything Is Written In Stone. . .

Post by bodom »

There actually isa sutta where he says "Be yoked to internal pleasantness..." but I just can't find it at present.


Here you go.
Here, the bhikkhu secluded from sense desires and demerit, with thoughts and thought processes and with joy and pleasantness born of seclusion attains to the first jhana. Overcoming thoughts and thought processes, the mind internally settled and brought to a single point and with joy and pleasantness born of concentration, attains to the second jhana.....re.....attains to the third jhana....re.....attains to the fourth jhana. To this is said the non sensual pleasure, the pleasure of seclusion, appeasement and enlightenment. It should be practiced, made much and should not be feared, I say. If it was said, knowing the evaluation of pleasantness, be yoked to internal pleasantness it was said on account of this.


http://www.mahindarama.com/e-tipitaka/M ... mn-139.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

:anjali:
Liberation is the inevitable fruit of the path and is bound to blossom forth when there is steady and persistent practice. The only requirements for reaching the final goal are two: to start and to continue. If these requirements are met there is no doubt the goal will be attained. This is the Dhamma, the undeviating law.

- BB
Nyana
Posts: 2233
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 11:56 am

Re: Not Everything Is Written In Stone. . .

Post by Nyana »

legolas wrote:I was actually enjoying your post and then you go and ruin it with "jhana-wallahs". surely this would refer to the Buddha who dwelt in Jhana whenever possible.
No worries Legolas, after being called a "jhana-wallah" by Tilt I was forcibly silenced for somehow taking this thread, which was supposed to be about jhana, off topic. Good to see that Tilt deems fit to designate everyone's practice marginal but his own.

All the best,

Geoff
User avatar
Vepacitta
Posts: 299
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 3:58 pm
Location: Somewhere on the slopes of Mt. Meru

Re: Not Everything Is Written In Stone. . .

Post by Vepacitta »

I wish you'd comment more Nana - your posts are always informative.

V.
I'm your friendly, neighbourhood Asura
User avatar
Modus.Ponens
Posts: 3853
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 2:38 am
Location: Gallifrey

Re: Not Everything Is Written In Stone. . .

Post by Modus.Ponens »

Tilt

In all your posts in this thread I haven't seen one that discusses Ian's (or others' by the way) exposition with substance. You argue with form and no substance is added. Why not quote the suttas to invalidate Ian's experience?
'This is peace, this is exquisite — the resolution of all fabrications; the relinquishment of all acquisitions; the ending of craving; dispassion; cessation; Unbinding.' - Jhana Sutta
Post Reply