Buddhist Wikipedia Improvement Project

A discussion on all aspects of Theravāda Buddhism
Post Reply
User avatar
gavesako
Posts: 1794
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 5:16 pm

Buddhist Wikipedia Improvement Project

Post by gavesako »

It is nearly spring and time for some cleaning work. Looking at some of the pages about Buddhism on Wikipedia, they seem to contain many factual errors, spelling mistakes, etc. For example this page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism_in_Thailand" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Another monk was thinking of how to improve the situation but ... "The problem is I am reluctant to much time into it because as soon as you've updated a page some know-nothing comes along and vandalises it according to his own prejudices."

There was already one call to do something about it on this blog:
http://sdhammika.blogspot.com/2009/08/b ... again.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Would there be any volunteers here to help with this problem?
Bhikkhu Gavesako
Kiṃkusalagavesī anuttaraṃ santivarapadaṃ pariyesamāno... (MN 26)

Access to Insight - Theravada texts
Ancient Buddhist Texts - Translations and history of Pali texts
Dhammatalks.org - Sutta translations
User avatar
tiltbillings
Posts: 23046
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am

Re: Buddhist Wikipedia Improvement Project

Post by tiltbillings »

There are a few good things on Wiki concerning Buddhism, but there are many gawd awful pieces of manure such as the article on anatta. It is a waste of time to try to correct the anatta article, given that Ken Wheeler, or one of his minions, will alter it back to the silly-assed drivel that he thinks is the truth of things.
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12

This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.

“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
User avatar
appicchato
Posts: 1602
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:47 am
Location: Bridge on the River Kwae

Re: Buddhist Wikipedia Improvement Project

Post by appicchato »

gavesako wrote:Would there be any volunteers here to help with this problem?
Give me some specifics as to what has to be done and I'll take a stab at it...
User avatar
BlackBird
Posts: 2069
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:07 pm

Re: Buddhist Wikipedia Improvement Project

Post by BlackBird »

I used to do a bit of editing here and there. Unfortunately you get a few amateur Buddhologists on there, and they're in the nasty habit of reverting anything you say that conflicts with their idea of what Buddhism's about. Anyway, best of luck team - Hope the citation-spree goes smoothly :)

metta
Jack
"For a disciple who has conviction in the Teacher's message & lives to penetrate it, what accords with the Dhamma is this:
'The Blessed One is the Teacher, I am a disciple. He is the one who knows, not I." - MN. 70 Kitagiri Sutta

Path Press - Ñāṇavīra Thera Dhamma Page - Ajahn Nyanamoli's Dhamma talks
User avatar
Ben
Posts: 18438
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:49 am
Location: kanamaluka

Re: Buddhist Wikipedia Improvement Project

Post by Ben »

Dear Venerable Gavesako

Stefan, a member here on Dhamma Wheel, seems to be active at Wikipedia. I know Stefan has contributed a few items, possibly lists and chronologies. You may consider inviting Stefan in any contributing/editing project.
kind regards

Ben
“No lists of things to be done. The day providential to itself. The hour. There is no later. This is later. All things of grace and beauty such that one holds them to one's heart have a common provenance in pain. Their birth in grief and ashes.”
- Cormac McCarthy, The Road

Learn this from the waters:
in mountain clefts and chasms,
loud gush the streamlets,
but great rivers flow silently.
- Sutta Nipata 3.725

Compassionate Hands Foundation (Buddhist aid in Myanmar) • Buddhist Global ReliefUNHCR

e: [email protected]..
User avatar
effort
Posts: 224
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 11:32 am

Re: Buddhist Wikipedia Improvement Project

Post by effort »

off topic:
i love satipatthana section in wiki, thats really look well categorised.
Lombardi4
Posts: 1551
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 2:53 pm

Re: Buddhist Wikipedia Improvement Project

Post by Lombardi4 »

I'll gladly help! Just tell me what to do (fix spelling, grammar, etc.) and the articles that need to be edited.
User avatar
gavesako
Posts: 1794
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 5:16 pm

Re: Buddhist Wikipedia Improvement Project

Post by gavesako »

It might be a good idea to take each Wikipedia article and look at it together, post quotes which are unclear or terms which are misspelled on this thread, and then through cooperative effort produce a better version. Maybe Stefan could be the one to do the actual Wikipedia updating.
Bhikkhu Gavesako
Kiṃkusalagavesī anuttaraṃ santivarapadaṃ pariyesamāno... (MN 26)

Access to Insight - Theravada texts
Ancient Buddhist Texts - Translations and history of Pali texts
Dhammatalks.org - Sutta translations
Mawkish1983
Posts: 1285
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:46 am
Location: Essex, UK

Re: Buddhist Wikipedia Improvement Project

Post by Mawkish1983 »

I like that idea. Centralised, organised, deliberate wholesome improvement of a resource used by millions and all-too-often regarded as 'fact'. I thought as long as good references were used 'edit wars' were forbidden? What better reference for Buddhism is there than the Canon?

Should other wikipedia editors feel the need to erroneously change what we correct, we should report them for breaking the wikipedia terms of use. I did it once on the Piano article, and the system does work.
User avatar
Cittasanto
Posts: 6646
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
Location: Ellan Vannin
Contact:

Re: Buddhist Wikipedia Improvement Project

Post by Cittasanto »

I will help where I can!

I am busy most of the time at the moment but will do what I can
Blog, Suttas, Aj Chah, Facebook.

He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them.
But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion …
...
He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.
John Stuart Mill
Lombardi4
Posts: 1551
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 2:53 pm

Re: Buddhist Wikipedia Improvement Project

Post by Lombardi4 »

For starters, I think the article on the Four Noble Truths needs expansion — it's too short an article for such an important topic, I think.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Noble_Truths" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Post Reply