Dear friends in Dhamma,
Does anyone have any information on the names of the Buddhas before Lord Tanhankara?
I have found passing mention in various works of Buddhas which supposedly precede Lord Tanhankara. Among those are Sirimata Buddha, Mahutta Buddha, Sumita Buddha, and a previous Metteyya/Maitreya Buddha.
These are Buddhas which Metteyya bodhisatta (may have) served and made aspirations under, and would have arisen in the past Aeon of Adornment/Glorious Kalpa. Lords Tanhankara, Medhankara, and Saranankara were the last three in a series of a thousand of that Aeon.
I have found reference of the first Buddha of that Aeon being named Flower Glow Buddha...
There is a work preserved by the Mahayana tradition which appears to give these names, as well as a thousand from both our present Aeon of the Wise and the future Aeon of Stars. Sometimes goes by: The Record of the Three Thousand Buddhas of the Three Kalpas. I found the chant in Chinese and Tibetan, but can't find the actual Sutra or English source.
There is also Epochs of the Conqueror, Jinakalamali which I wouldn't mind reading. The Digha Nikaya commentary might have info too, but I can't find it.
I'm aware I'm wandering into potentially late works, but any info regarding pre-Lord Tanhankara Buddhas would be most appreciated.
Metta and peace,
Bowing and thanks,
Upasaka Abhaya
Buddhas before Lord Tanhankara
-
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:42 am
Re: Buddhas before Lord Tanhankara
Vipassi, Sikhi, Vessabhu, Kakusanda, Konagamana, Kassapa, and Angirasa (Gotama) are named in the oldest strata of the Pali text (https://accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/dn ... #fnt-s24-4)UpasakaAbhaya wrote: ↑Thu Aug 15, 2019 7:50 pm Dear friends in Dhamma,
Does anyone have any information on the names of the Buddhas before Lord Tanhankara?
I have found passing mention in various works of Buddhas which supposedly precede Lord Tanhankara. Among those are Sirimata Buddha, Mahutta Buddha, Sumita Buddha, and a previous Metteyya/Maitreya Buddha.
These are Buddhas which Metteyya bodhisatta (may have) served and made aspirations under, and would have arisen in the past Aeon of Adornment/Glorious Kalpa. Lords Tanhankara, Medhankara, and Saranankara were the last three in a series of a thousand of that Aeon.
I have found reference of the first Buddha of that Aeon being named Flower Glow Buddha...
There is a work preserved by the Mahayana tradition which appears to give these names, as well as a thousand from both our present Aeon of the Wise and the future Aeon of Stars. Sometimes goes by: The Record of the Three Thousand Buddhas of the Three Kalpas. I found the chant in Chinese and Tibetan, but can't find the actual Sutra or English source.
There is also Epochs of the Conqueror, Jinakalamali which I wouldn't mind reading. The Digha Nikaya commentary might have info too, but I can't find it.
I'm aware I'm wandering into potentially late works, but any info regarding pre-Lord Tanhankara Buddhas would be most appreciated.
Metta and peace,
Bowing and thanks,
Upasaka Abhaya
I'm not aware of any other names outside of the Buddhavamsa (which is supposedly a late text)
- Bhikkhu Pesala
- Posts: 4647
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:17 pm
Re: Buddhas before Lord Tanhankara
Blog • Pāli Fonts • In This Very Life • Buddhist Chronicles • Software (Upasampadā: 24th June, 1979)
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:22 pm
Re: Buddhas before Lord Tanhankara
Dear Cookiemonster,
Those are the only ones mentioned in the suttas, but the Buddhavamsa is counted by many as included within the Pali Canon. I believe the Jinakalamali is a Thai post canonical work.
Abhaya
Those are the only ones mentioned in the suttas, but the Buddhavamsa is counted by many as included within the Pali Canon. I believe the Jinakalamali is a Thai post canonical work.
Abhaya
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:22 pm
Re: Buddhas before Lord Tanhankara
Dear Venerable Sir,
Is the Anagatavamsa not a Theravada commentary?
Metta and peace,
Bowing and thanks,
Upasaka Abhaya
Is the Anagatavamsa not a Theravada commentary?
Metta and peace,
Bowing and thanks,
Upasaka Abhaya
- Nicholas Weeks
- Posts: 4210
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:26 pm
- Location: USA West Coast
Re: Buddhas before Lord Tanhankara
As I wrote over at Dharma Wheel:
Neither the Buddhavamsa nor the Mahavastu name any Buddhas before Tanhankara. Since he was the first in the Saramanda kappa, one needs at least to know the name of the previous kappa, which I do not.
Good and evil have no fixed form. It's as easy to turn from doing bad to doing good as it is to flip over the hand from the back to the palm. It's simply up to us to do it. Master Hsuan Hua.
- Dhammanando
- Posts: 6512
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:44 pm
- Location: Mae Wang Huai Rin, Li District, Lamphun
Re: Buddhas before Lord Tanhankara
There's a scanned copy of the Jinakālamālī here (Pali in Thai script and Thai translation):UpasakaAbhaya wrote: ↑Thu Aug 15, 2019 7:50 pm There is also Epochs of the Conqueror, Jinakalamali which I wouldn't mind reading. The Digha Nikaya commentary might have info too, but I can't find it.
http://www.finearts.go.th/chiangmailibr ... tml?page=1
But the chapter entitled Atidūrenidāna, "Stories of the Long Distant Past", doesn't name any Buddha before the sāramaṇḍakappa in which Sumedha met Dīpaṅkara.
Nor does the Dīgha Atthakathā, which can be read at the Goenka Tipiṭaka website: https://www.tipitaka.org/
Yena yena hi maññanti,
tato taṃ hoti aññathā.
In whatever way they conceive it,
It turns out otherwise.
(Sn. 588)
tato taṃ hoti aññathā.
In whatever way they conceive it,
It turns out otherwise.
(Sn. 588)
- Nicholas Weeks
- Posts: 4210
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:26 pm
- Location: USA West Coast
Re: Buddhas before Lord Tanhankara
A related query: There is a list of kappas by number of buddhas - one appears, two appear etc. It would be nice & tidy if the chronological sequence of the kappas was the same, but I doubt it - or is it so?
Good and evil have no fixed form. It's as easy to turn from doing bad to doing good as it is to flip over the hand from the back to the palm. It's simply up to us to do it. Master Hsuan Hua.
- salayatananirodha
- Posts: 1479
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2018 1:34 am
- Contact:
Re: Buddhas before Lord Tanhankara
does the buddhavamsa not contradict the earlier suttas which list seven buddhas
I host a sutta discussion via Zoom Sundays at 11AM Chicago time — message me if you are interested
- Dhammanando
- Posts: 6512
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:44 pm
- Location: Mae Wang Huai Rin, Li District, Lamphun
Re: Buddhas before Lord Tanhankara
The Buddhavaṃsa is based on a much longer time frame than the ninety-one aeons of the Mahāpadānasutta and Āṭānāṭiya Suttas.salayatananirodha wrote: ↑Tue Aug 20, 2019 2:09 pm does the buddhavamsa not contradict the earlier suttas which list seven buddhas
Yena yena hi maññanti,
tato taṃ hoti aññathā.
In whatever way they conceive it,
It turns out otherwise.
(Sn. 588)
tato taṃ hoti aññathā.
In whatever way they conceive it,
It turns out otherwise.
(Sn. 588)
Re: Buddhas before Lord Tanhankara
Do you find it strange where the name of all the Buddha does not have something like Dae Jung , Kovit , Alex , Putin , Shiva , Orgyen and Aung ?
You always gain by giving
- Dhammanando
- Posts: 6512
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:44 pm
- Location: Mae Wang Huai Rin, Li District, Lamphun
Re: Buddhas before Lord Tanhankara
No stranger than the fact that Ānanda becomes "Anon" in Thai and "Kun dga' bo" in Tibetan, or that Mahākassapa becomes "Da Jia She" in Chinese.
If a text is in Pali then we may anticipate that any proper name imported from another language will be Pali-ized, either by having its meaning translated into Pali or its pronunciation modified to fit the Pali phonemic system.
Yena yena hi maññanti,
tato taṃ hoti aññathā.
In whatever way they conceive it,
It turns out otherwise.
(Sn. 588)
tato taṃ hoti aññathā.
In whatever way they conceive it,
It turns out otherwise.
(Sn. 588)
Re: Buddhas before Lord Tanhankara
Venerable , that doesn't mean the Buddha origins came from Thai ethnic , Japanese race or an African ! It does appear that the Buddha of previous era all came from India .Dhammanando wrote: ↑Tue Aug 20, 2019 5:49 pmNo stranger than the fact that Ānanda becomes "Anon" in Thai and "Kun dga' bo" in Tibetan, or that Mahākassapa becomes "Da Jia She" in Chinese.
If a text is in Pali then we may anticipate that any proper name imported from another language will be Pali-ized, either by having its meaning translated into Pali or its pronunciation modified to fit the Pali phonemic system.
You always gain by giving
- cappuccino
- Posts: 12977
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 1:45 am
- Contact:
Re: Buddhas before Lord Tanhankara
it was said Buddha waited for the right time & place to be reborn
- Dhammanando
- Posts: 6512
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:44 pm
- Location: Mae Wang Huai Rin, Li District, Lamphun
Re: Buddhas before Lord Tanhankara
Surely what it means is that the fact that their names are preserved in Pali provides no clue at all as to where they flourished, just as "Alfredus Magnus" provides no clue that Alfred the Great was a Saxon from Wessex, or as "Carolus Magnus" provides no clue that Charlemagne was King of the Franks.
Yena yena hi maññanti,
tato taṃ hoti aññathā.
In whatever way they conceive it,
It turns out otherwise.
(Sn. 588)
tato taṃ hoti aññathā.
In whatever way they conceive it,
It turns out otherwise.
(Sn. 588)