Why Dhammawheel is not growing?

Tell us how you think the forum can be improved. We will listen.
Locked
SarathW
Posts: 21226
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:49 am

Why Dhammawheel is not growing?

Post by SarathW »

Why Dhammawheel is not growing?

I am visiting Dhamma Wheel for almost two years .
The users on line in a given time is less than 100 most of the time.
This is less than 0.5% of the registered users.
I expect that should be around 10.0%
I think we should aim for 5.0%
We should investigate why new comers leave the forum.
I suggest we make a voting type questioner for member who leave the forum.
Every new comer should be alerted to this questioner at the introduction or at the time of joining.

Suggested questions:
a) Just lost the initial interest in Buddhism.
b) I am intimidated by the advance discussions . I have nothing to contribute
c) I felt Buddhism is as bad as any other religion.

etc
:thinking:
“As the lamp consumes oil, the path realises Nibbana”
User avatar
DNS
Site Admin
Posts: 17186
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:15 am
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, Estados Unidos de América
Contact:

Re: Why Dhammawheel is not growing?

Post by DNS »

SarathW wrote: The users on line in a given time is less than 100 most of the time.
This is normal. It is measured by who has been online in only the last 30 minutes, not the entire day. There are members in almost every time zone, some need to go to work, school, or get some sleep sometimes.
This is less than 0.5% of the registered users.
This is normal. Some members just read, not all actively participate with posts.

Everyday about 4 to 10 new members join.
SarathW
Posts: 21226
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:49 am

Re: Why Dhammawheel is not growing?

Post by SarathW »

Sorry I got my calculations wrong!
Currently 82/8565*100=0.95%

:)
“As the lamp consumes oil, the path realises Nibbana”
User avatar
Dan74
Posts: 4529
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:12 pm
Location: Switzerland

Re: Why Dhammawheel is not growing?

Post by Dan74 »

I think offering an optional questionnaire at the time of joining (what one is looking for? what are the expectations? etc) and also asking for feedback (optional of course) from members is a good idea to gauge where the forum is succeeding and where it is not. Of course all such needed to be taken with a grain of salt but could be useful.
_/|\_
Spiny Norman
Posts: 10157
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:32 am
Location: Andromeda looks nice

Re: Why Dhammawheel is not growing?

Post by Spiny Norman »

SarathW wrote:Why Dhammawheel is not growing?
Dhamma Wheel is a lot busier than some other forums.
Buddha save me from new-agers!
User avatar
Modus.Ponens
Posts: 3853
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 2:38 am
Location: Gallifrey

Re: Why Dhammawheel is not growing?

Post by Modus.Ponens »

Dan74 wrote:I think offering an optional questionnaire at the time of joining (what one is looking for? what are the expectations? etc) and also asking for feedback (optional of course) from members is a good idea to gauge where the forum is succeeding and where it is not. Of course all such needed to be taken with a grain of salt but could be useful.
This is a good idea, SarathW and Dan74.

Feedback would be good to improve things. As long as these changes do not go against the principles of the forum, I don't see any significant disadvantage.
'This is peace, this is exquisite — the resolution of all fabrications; the relinquishment of all acquisitions; the ending of craving; dispassion; cessation; Unbinding.' - Jhana Sutta
User avatar
Kim OHara
Posts: 5584
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 5:47 am
Location: North Queensland, Australia

Re: Why Dhammawheel is not growing?

Post by Kim OHara »

Modus.Ponens wrote:
Dan74 wrote:I think offering an optional questionnaire at the time of joining (what one is looking for? what are the expectations? etc) and also asking for feedback (optional of course) from members is a good idea to gauge where the forum is succeeding and where it is not. Of course all such needed to be taken with a grain of salt but could be useful.
This is a good idea, SarathW and Dan74.

Feedback would be good to improve things. As long as these changes do not go against the principles of the forum, I don't see any significant disadvantage.
So long as we take the results as only a very weak hint of what people might want, I'm with you.
New members will generally not know enough about the forum to make informed comments, after all, and long-term members are generally going to be happy with the way the forum works or they wouldn't have stayed long enough to be long-term members.

:coffee:
Kim
User avatar
Modus.Ponens
Posts: 3853
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 2:38 am
Location: Gallifrey

Re: Why Dhammawheel is not growing?

Post by Modus.Ponens »

Kim OHara wrote:
Modus.Ponens wrote:
Dan74 wrote:I think offering an optional questionnaire at the time of joining (what one is looking for? what are the expectations? etc) and also asking for feedback (optional of course) from members is a good idea to gauge where the forum is succeeding and where it is not. Of course all such needed to be taken with a grain of salt but could be useful.
This is a good idea, SarathW and Dan74.

Feedback would be good to improve things. As long as these changes do not go against the principles of the forum, I don't see any significant disadvantage.
So long as we take the results as only a very weak hint of what people might want, I'm with you.
New members will generally not know enough about the forum to make informed comments, after all, and long-term members are generally going to be happy with the way the forum works or they wouldn't have stayed long enough to be long-term members.

:coffee:
Kim
I agree. An equilibrium has to be found in order that (eventualy) new suggestions work. And the fact that there are a lot of newcomers would make it difficult to distinguish the results of a poll. Maybe that's why SarathW suggested in the OP that newcomers fill a questionaire.
I don't know if polls can distinguish new members from old members. If they can't, SarathW's suggestion would be the best.
'This is peace, this is exquisite — the resolution of all fabrications; the relinquishment of all acquisitions; the ending of craving; dispassion; cessation; Unbinding.' - Jhana Sutta
daverupa
Posts: 5980
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:58 pm

Re: Why Dhammawheel is not growing?

Post by daverupa »

The question to answer is: what would such a questionnaire accomplish that the Suggestion Box does not?
  • "And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting oneself one protects others? By the pursuit, development, and cultivation of the four establishments of mindfulness. It is in such a way that by protecting oneself one protects others.

    "And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting others one protects oneself? By patience, harmlessness, goodwill, and sympathy. It is in such a way that by protecting others one protects oneself.

- Sedaka Sutta [SN 47.19]
User avatar
TheNoBSBuddhist
Posts: 1614
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 4:06 pm
Location: Loch Lomond, via the High AND Low road....

Re: Why Dhammawheel is not growing?

Post by TheNoBSBuddhist »

I don't see the point of the question, if I may say so. From my PoV such membership traffic is par for the course. People can come here with an open mind, take what they need and come and go as they please. For all the fluctuations in the forum, I see little or no effect on the overall purpose of the forum. Like a river, it is largely unaffected by the number of boats floating on it....
:namaste:

You will not be punished FOR your 'emotions'; you will be punished BY your 'emotions'.



Image

Pay attention, simplify, and (Meditation instruction in a nutshell) "Mind - the Gap."
‘Absit invidia verbo’ - may ill-will be absent from the word. And mindful of that, if I don't respond, this may be why....
User avatar
Modus.Ponens
Posts: 3853
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 2:38 am
Location: Gallifrey

Re: Why Dhammawheel is not growing?

Post by Modus.Ponens »

daverupa wrote:The question to answer is: what would such a questionnaire accomplish that the Suggestion Box does not?
I think two things:

1- It's better to have a statisticaly good idea of what annonymous people want, instead of the occasional public suggestion in this part of the forum. Organising the numbers into statistical data can be very useful.

2- If the case that some kind of questionaire was (optionaly) done at the begining of the membership on DW, people would be encouraged to participate more actively in shaping the forum they want. As long as what new members want doesn't go against the present main principles of the forum.

This forum was created 5 or 6 years ago. Since all things are impermanent and the companies that survive the longest are the ones that innovate, I think this is a good idea.

Plus, the information doesn't have to be public. It can be just for moderators to know.
'This is peace, this is exquisite — the resolution of all fabrications; the relinquishment of all acquisitions; the ending of craving; dispassion; cessation; Unbinding.' - Jhana Sutta
User avatar
acinteyyo
Posts: 1706
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 9:48 am
Location: Bavaria / Germany

Re: Why Dhammawheel is not growing?

Post by acinteyyo »

TheNoBSBuddhist wrote:I don't see the point of the question, if I may say so. From my PoV such membership traffic is par for the course. People can come here with an open mind, take what they need and come and go as they please. For all the fluctuations in the forum, I see little or no effect on the overall purpose of the forum. Like a river, it is largely unaffected by the number of boats floating on it....
Seconded. Besides I don't think there is any need for growth. I don't want to say that growth isn't welcomed but I just don't see any necessity for it.
Thag 1.20. Ajita - I do not fear death; nor do I long for life. I’ll lay down this body, aware and mindful.
User avatar
Kim OHara
Posts: 5584
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 5:47 am
Location: North Queensland, Australia

Re: Why Dhammawheel is not growing?

Post by Kim OHara »

Modus.Ponens wrote:I think two things:

1- It's better to have a statisticaly good idea of what annonymous people want, instead of the occasional public suggestion in this part of the forum. Organising the numbers into statistical data can be very useful.
That's fine if we have enough data to be representative, but I doubt that we will get it. That's why I said earlier that I'm only in favour so long as we don't rely too much on the responses.

:coffee:
Kim
SarathW
Posts: 21226
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:49 am

Re: Why Dhammawheel is not growing?

Post by SarathW »

A typical exit interview question for a large corporation.

http://www.exitinterviews.com.au/exampl ... stions.htm
“As the lamp consumes oil, the path realises Nibbana”
User avatar
Mkoll
Posts: 6594
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2012 6:55 pm
Location: USA

Re: Why Dhammawheel is not growing?

Post by Mkoll »

acinteyyo wrote:
TheNoBSBuddhist wrote:I don't see the point of the question, if I may say so. From my PoV such membership traffic is par for the course. People can come here with an open mind, take what they need and come and go as they please. For all the fluctuations in the forum, I see little or no effect on the overall purpose of the forum. Like a river, it is largely unaffected by the number of boats floating on it....
Seconded. Besides I don't think there is any need for growth. I don't want to say that growth isn't welcomed but I just don't see any necessity for it.
I agree. Intervention to spur growth is unnecessary.
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa
Locked