the great vegetarian debate

Exploring Theravāda's connections to other paths - what can we learn from other traditions, religions and philosophies?
User avatar
Ron-The-Elder
Posts: 1887
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:42 pm
Location: Concord, New Hampshire, U.S.A.

Re: the great vegetarian debate

Post by Ron-The-Elder » Wed Jun 04, 2014 2:06 pm

Saw this during this morning's reading. It seemed right to me! :tongue:

Image
What Makes an Elder? :
A head of gray hairs doesn't mean one's an elder. Advanced in years, one's called an old fool.
But one in whom there is truth, restraint, rectitude, gentleness,self-control, he's called an elder, his impurities disgorged, enlightened.
-Dhammpada, 19, translated by Thanissaro Bhikkhu.

User avatar
TheNoBSBuddhist
Posts: 1614
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 4:06 pm
Location: Loch Lomond, via the High AND Low road....

Re: the great vegetarian debate

Post by TheNoBSBuddhist » Wed Jun 04, 2014 2:30 pm

The dandelion has it coming.... I make an excellent salad using young dandelion leaves!
:namaste:

You will not be punished FOR your 'emotions'; you will be punished BY your 'emotions'.



Image

Pay attention, simplify, and (Meditation instruction in a nutshell) "Mind - the Gap."
‘Absit invidia verbo’ - may ill-will be absent from the word. And mindful of that, if I don't respond, this may be why....

mahat
Posts: 71
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:36 pm

Re: the great vegetarian debate

Post by mahat » Sun Jun 22, 2014 12:25 am

Our job is to break through to the Dhamma and escape the cycle of samsara, not become fettered with world views and become animal rights activists. Those who get it and don't waste time with opinions and views are the ones who understand.

Millions of animals/sentient beings are killed in farming to save crops from "pests" -- do vegetarians feel guilt about them?
Why should meat eaters feel guilty about animals being raised for actual food? The animal is fed, protected and in turn it provides us with meat. It's a relationship mankind has developed due to his losing his ability to digest plant food (see Aganna Sutta when plants started defending themselves from our greed by evolving husks) real vegetarian animals can digest cellulose, humans can't which is why it's fiber for us. So they're our friends and we should treat them with respect.

My own experience -- I follow the Jataka diet! Eat everything but without lust.

The Vinaya and Jatakas several times state that fish and meat have great medicinal value, and my experience with that is true.

I had psoriasis on my elbow, quail eggs cured that in a couple of weeks! (Batak Jataka -- since The Lord Was born as a quail I figured there would be great medicinal value in it)
Beef also helped me overpower an autistic teenager twice my size and weight who scares the heck out of his teachers due to his aggressive behavior -- he can literally bite your skin off.

So meat does give you the physical strength to fight of what can only be described as "demonic forces".
I was feeling tired and got excessively cold this winter, I ate beef and pork I had tremendous amount of energy and heat.

Buddha loved us all and as long as we do plenty of good deeds, and meditate everyday, he couldn't care less about what we ate as long as we are free of aversion, lust and greed... the Vinaya clearly states killing of an animal is a relatively minor offense compared to killing a human. The human birth can redeem everyone, so let's not waste it.

If vegetarians have aversion, they are not doing The Lord's teaching and are like unto Devdatta who never even became a stream enterer and will be trapped in this merciless world -- Buddha called this world the slaughter house.

User avatar
lyndon taylor
Posts: 1835
Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 11:41 pm
Location: Redlands, US occupied Northern Mexico
Contact:

Re: the great vegetarian debate

Post by lyndon taylor » Sun Jun 22, 2014 12:49 am

It seems you have all kinds of selfish compassion for yourself and your health, but no compassion for the poor animals being killed for your plate, let alone any compassion for those that choose not to kill any more animals than is absolutely necessary, which as Ron quoted above may be up to as much as 50% of Buddhists.
18 years ago I made one of the most important decisions of my life and entered a local Cambodian Buddhist Temple as a temple boy and, for only 3 weeks, an actual Therevada Buddhist monk. I am not a scholar, great meditator, or authority on Buddhism, but Buddhism is something I love from the Bottom of my heart. It has taught me sobriety, morality, peace, and very importantly that my suffering is optional, and doesn't have to run my life. I hope to give back what little I can to the Buddhist community, sincerely former monk John

http://trickleupeconomictheory.blogspot.com/

mahat
Posts: 71
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:36 pm

Re: the great vegetarian debate

Post by mahat » Sun Jun 22, 2014 2:10 am

lyndon taylor wrote:It seems you have all kinds of selfish compassion for yourself and your health, but no compassion for the poor animals being killed for your plate, let alone any compassion for those that choose not to kill any more animals than is absolutely necessary, which as Ron quoted above may be up to as much as 50% of Buddhists.
Wow, quite judgmental. Again, there is NO moral question for anyone who merely eats meat bought from a grocery store or a restaurant. Anyone who annoys a nonvegetarian in this regard is creating seriously bad Kamma for him/herself. Even Buddha stated this quite clearly in The Amagandha Sutta. Unfortunately it is typical of Devadutta's minions who never got far in The Dhamma. Devdatta died not being a stream enterer and going to Avici hell instead. He thought he was smarter than Buddha.

I have right view. I understand that ALL the food on my plate was brought by killing sentient beings, including the vegetables that caused millions of sentient beings to die through farming. You are blind to the sentient beings killed from farming, thus my compassion is all seeing, a vegetarian's is limited. I am thankful and through practicing the Dhamma help redeem all the sentient beings that sacrifice their life for being food.

Vegetarians don't even see that plants are sentient enough to evolve self protective mechanisms like husks to protect themselves from us over eating them. We literally have to thrash wheat and barley to get the grains out. Yet you call yourself compassionate.

The Vinaya states clearly, hurting plant life also requires confession. The human birth is the most precious especially one that practices the Dhamma.

I eat once a day, btw. Not that even that is a requirement on nonUposatha days for lay people.

User avatar
lyndon taylor
Posts: 1835
Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 11:41 pm
Location: Redlands, US occupied Northern Mexico
Contact:

Re: the great vegetarian debate

Post by lyndon taylor » Sun Jun 22, 2014 2:21 am

its people like you that give meat eaters a bad name, devadattu ended up becoming an arahant according to another poster, don't know if that's true, any way vegetarianism is a moral decision, just not part of your morality, if you want to accumulate your karma the way you want that's your business, I suggest you stay out of other people's business like mine.
18 years ago I made one of the most important decisions of my life and entered a local Cambodian Buddhist Temple as a temple boy and, for only 3 weeks, an actual Therevada Buddhist monk. I am not a scholar, great meditator, or authority on Buddhism, but Buddhism is something I love from the Bottom of my heart. It has taught me sobriety, morality, peace, and very importantly that my suffering is optional, and doesn't have to run my life. I hope to give back what little I can to the Buddhist community, sincerely former monk John

http://trickleupeconomictheory.blogspot.com/

mahat
Posts: 71
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:36 pm

Re: the great vegetarian debate

Post by mahat » Sun Jun 22, 2014 2:46 am

lyndon taylor wrote:its people like you that give meat eaters a bad name, devadattu ended up becoming an arahant according to another poster, don't know if that's true, any way vegetarianism is a moral decision, just not part of your morality, if you want to accumulate your karma the way you want that's your business, I suggest you stay out of other people's business like mine.
Devadutta went to Avici hell and will remain there for the entire kalpa according to Tipitika sources. I have a right to post my understanding of Dhamma as you have a right to post yours.

Peace. :anjali:

User avatar
lyndon taylor
Posts: 1835
Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 11:41 pm
Location: Redlands, US occupied Northern Mexico
Contact:

Re: the great vegetarian debate

Post by lyndon taylor » Sun Jun 22, 2014 2:52 am

Likewise for you if you go around supporting the idea that the buddha would approve of our factory farming of animals for consumption. Like I said you've completely missed the point of buddhism, compassion for all beings, not compassion for your stomach. You're in a morally indefensible position, and I don't think anything you say is going to get you out of it, especially claiming its bad karma to criticize meat eating. bad karma to save animals lives, bad karma to give animals a better life, yeah right, show me where the Buddha supports that nonsense......
18 years ago I made one of the most important decisions of my life and entered a local Cambodian Buddhist Temple as a temple boy and, for only 3 weeks, an actual Therevada Buddhist monk. I am not a scholar, great meditator, or authority on Buddhism, but Buddhism is something I love from the Bottom of my heart. It has taught me sobriety, morality, peace, and very importantly that my suffering is optional, and doesn't have to run my life. I hope to give back what little I can to the Buddhist community, sincerely former monk John

http://trickleupeconomictheory.blogspot.com/

User avatar
Mkoll
Posts: 6432
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2012 6:55 pm
Location: California

Re: the great vegetarian debate

Post by Mkoll » Sun Jun 22, 2014 3:29 am

mahat wrote:Millions of animals/sentient beings are killed in farming to save crops from "pests" -- do vegetarians feel guilt about them?
Why should meat eaters feel guilty about animals being raised for actual food?
Whether you want to be guilty or not is your prerogative.
mahat wrote:It's a relationship mankind has developed due to his losing his ability to digest plant food (see Aganna Sutta when plants started defending themselves from our greed by evolving husks) real vegetarian animals can digest cellulose, humans can't which is why it's fiber for us.
Fiber is good for us. It helps prevent diseases and is part of a healthy diet. Meat has no fiber. So if all you eat is meat you will raise your risk of contracting many diseases.
mahat wrote:Beef also helped me overpower an autistic teenager twice my size and weight who scares the heck out of his teachers due to his aggressive behavior -- he can literally bite your skin off.
What did you do, hit him over the head with a T-bone steak? :lol:
mahat wrote:So meat does give you the physical strength to fight of what can only be described as "demonic forces".
:rofl:
mahat wrote:Buddha loved us all and as long as we do plenty of good deeds, and meditate everyday, he couldn't care less about what we ate as long as we are free of aversion, lust and greed... the Vinaya clearly states killing of an animal is a relatively minor offense compared to killing a human. The human birth can redeem everyone, so let's not waste it.
You're forgetting delusion. Freudian slip methinks.
mahat wrote:If vegetarians have aversion, they are not doing The Lord's teaching and are like unto Devdatta who never even became a stream enterer and will be trapped in this merciless world -- Buddha called this world the slaughter house.
How about if meat eaters have aversion? Would they be like Devadatta as well or are only vegetarians allowed that dubious honor?

~~~

Sheesh, I've read radical vegans online but this is the first radical meat eater I've ever encountered.
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa

User avatar
TheNoBSBuddhist
Posts: 1614
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 4:06 pm
Location: Loch Lomond, via the High AND Low road....

Re: the great vegetarian debate

Post by TheNoBSBuddhist » Sun Jun 22, 2014 8:00 am

what a pile of crock....

:goodpost: MKoll....

Jeesh, if this is what meat-eating does to your Mind, I'm very happy I became a vegetarian!

(I use to eat meat, now I don't. So like many others here, I have indulged in meat, and did so for quite some time, before deciing on removing it form my diet.

Never felt better.)

Frankly, I cannot be bothered to respond to your comments mahat.
I find them ludicrous, and to do so would be a waste of my time.
:namaste:

You will not be punished FOR your 'emotions'; you will be punished BY your 'emotions'.



Image

Pay attention, simplify, and (Meditation instruction in a nutshell) "Mind - the Gap."
‘Absit invidia verbo’ - may ill-will be absent from the word. And mindful of that, if I don't respond, this may be why....

User avatar
Aloka
Posts: 5760
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 2:51 pm

Re: the great vegetarian debate

Post by Aloka » Sun Jun 22, 2014 9:31 am

Mckoll wrote: Sheesh, I've read radical vegans online but this is the first radical meat eater I've ever encountered.
Its not the first for me, unfortunately, which is why I decided it was probably best not to waste my time having discussions with them.


:pig:
Last edited by Aloka on Sun Jun 22, 2014 9:38 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Mkoll
Posts: 6432
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2012 6:55 pm
Location: California

Re: the great vegetarian debate

Post by Mkoll » Sun Jun 22, 2014 9:37 am

Aloka wrote:
Sheesh, I've read radical vegans online but this is the first radical meat eater I've ever encountered.
Its not the first for me, unfortunately, which is why I've decided to try not to waste my time by having discussions with them.


:pig:
What I find peculiar is that he thinks vegetarians will go to hell. I mean, that's just really out there.

:alien:
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa

User avatar
Aloka
Posts: 5760
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 2:51 pm

Re: the great vegetarian debate

Post by Aloka » Sun Jun 22, 2014 9:53 am

Mkoll wrote: What I find peculiar is that he thinks vegetarians will go to hell. I mean, that's just really out there.

:alien:
There's an intriguing short article by Master Hsuan Hua: "The Horrors of Taking Lives and Eating Meat"

http://www.shabkar.org/download/pdf/The ... g_Meat.pdf

Excerpt:

"How strange! How very strange indeed!
The grandson marries the grandmother.
The daughter is eating her mother's flesh,
And the son is beating on a drum stretched with his father's skin.
Pigs and sheep are sitting on the couch,
And the six kinds of relatives are cooking in the pots.
People have come to offer congratulations,
But I see that it is truly suffering!"
:)

User avatar
TheNoBSBuddhist
Posts: 1614
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 4:06 pm
Location: Loch Lomond, via the High AND Low road....

Re: the great vegetarian debate

Post by TheNoBSBuddhist » Sun Jun 22, 2014 10:22 am

I'm going to Tweet
"I don't eat meat,
Greens are my thing
from Fall to spring
in Winter-time
(to make things rhyme)
fewer shoots
more tubers, roots..."
If meat's your dish
I only wish
you like your meal
but really feel
I've made it clear
at least in here
that argument
is time ill-spent
and your opinion
holds no dominion.
All flesh is grass,
so up your artfully- prepared chicken cutlet and gravy.
:namaste:

You will not be punished FOR your 'emotions'; you will be punished BY your 'emotions'.



Image

Pay attention, simplify, and (Meditation instruction in a nutshell) "Mind - the Gap."
‘Absit invidia verbo’ - may ill-will be absent from the word. And mindful of that, if I don't respond, this may be why....

User avatar
seeker242
Posts: 706
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 3:01 am

Re: the great vegetarian debate

Post by seeker242 » Sun Jun 22, 2014 11:47 am

mahat wrote: The animal is fed, protected and in turn it provides us with meat.
Most people, at least where I am from, become vegetarians because many of the animals are not protected. They are horribly mistreated and abused, and then killed. They are treated like mere property, like inanimate objects, with no concern for their sentience. With no respect whatsoever. They suffer tremendously at the hands of those farm workers.
Buddha loved us all and as long as we do plenty of good deeds, and meditate everyday, he couldn't care less about what we ate as long as we are free of aversion, lust and greed...


I would not say that is entirely true. The rules he made concerning meat being "pure in 3 respects" indicated that he did care what his monks ate. The meat that was not "pure in 3 respect" he considered to not be "karmicily pure". He only allowed meat eating in certain circumstances, not any or all circumstances. Of course, this was just for his monks.
If vegetarians have aversion, they are not doing The Lord's teaching and are like unto Devdatta who never even became a stream enterer and will be trapped in this merciless world -- Buddha called this world the slaughter house.
Well, if you think about it, aversion to the systemic abusing and killing of masses of sentient beings, could easily just be a function of compassion. And trying to help those suffering beings is not really inappropriate according to the Lords teaching.

:anjali:

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 64 guests