If nature/reality/time is considered cyclical..

Exploring Theravāda's connections to other paths. What can we learn from other traditions, religions and philosophies?
Post Reply
curiosity
Posts: 34
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 7:10 am

If nature/reality/time is considered cyclical..

Post by curiosity » Thu Jan 09, 2014 6:18 am

.
Last edited by curiosity on Fri Jan 17, 2014 8:26 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Mkoll
Posts: 6382
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2012 6:55 pm
Location: California

Re: If nature/reality/time is considered cyclical..

Post by Mkoll » Thu Jan 09, 2014 7:27 am

Dear curiosity,

I don't recall the Buddha ever saying that nature/reality/time is considered "cyclical".

How do you define "cyclical"?

:anjali:
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa

User avatar
manas
Posts: 2357
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:04 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: If nature/reality/time is considered cyclical..

Post by manas » Thu Jan 09, 2014 7:49 am

curiosity wrote:How is it that one does not ever return from Nirvana to the other stages?

Does this not breach the intrinsic nature of cyclicality?
Hi curiousity,

One who has attained to the ending of craving is 'untraceable even in the here-and-now', so we certainly cannot define them after they have passed away. We are getting past what words can adequately describe here.

kind regards,
manas
:anjali:
"With regard to internal factors, I don't envision any other single factor like appropriate attention as doing so much for a monk in training, who has not attained the goal but remains intent on the unsurpassed safety from bondage. A monk who attends appropriately abandons what is unskillful and develops what is skillful."
- from the Itivuttaka

User avatar
Goofaholix
Posts: 2966
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 3:49 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: If nature/reality/time is considered cyclical..

Post by Goofaholix » Thu Jan 09, 2014 8:34 am

curiosity wrote:How is it that one does not ever return from Nirvana to the other stages?

Does this not breach the intrinsic nature of cyclicality?
Because Nibbana is the only thing that breaks the cycle of samsara, that's the point, and one of the reasons why it's worth pursuing.
“Peace is within oneself to be found in the same place as agitation and suffering. It is not found in a forest or on a hilltop, nor is it given by a teacher. Where you experience suffering, you can also find freedom from suffering. Trying to run away from suffering is actually to run toward it.” ― Ajahn Chah

walkart
Posts: 136
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2013 6:13 pm

Re: If nature/reality/time is considered cyclical..

Post by walkart » Thu Jan 09, 2014 8:54 am

curiosity wrote:How is it that one does not ever return from Nirvana to the other stages?

Does this not breach the intrinsic nature of cyclicality?
There is cycles, but its not mean that all will repaet in exactly the same way.

Dinsdale
Posts: 5294
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:32 am
Location: Andromeda looks nice

Re: If nature/reality/time is considered cyclical..

Post by Dinsdale » Thu Jan 09, 2014 3:53 pm

Goofaholix wrote: Because Nibbana is the only thing that breaks the cycle of samsara, that's the point, and one of the reasons why it's worth pursuing.
Yes, that's how I understand it.

Babadhari
Posts: 459
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2013 1:23 pm
Location: lalita ghat

Re: If nature/reality/time is considered cyclical..

Post by Babadhari » Thu Jan 09, 2014 4:04 pm

Goofaholix wrote:
Because Nibbana is the only thing that breaks the cycle of samsara, that's the point, and one of the reasons why it's worth pursuing.
:goodpost:
Aflame with the fire of passion, the fire of aversion, the fire of delusion.
Aflame, with birth, aging & death, with sorrows, lamentations, pains, distresses, & despairs ......

Seeing thus, the disciple of the Noble One grows disenchanted. SN 35.28

User avatar
clw_uk
Posts: 4718
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:36 am

Re: If nature/reality/time is considered cyclical..

Post by clw_uk » Fri Jan 17, 2014 2:43 am

curiosity wrote:How is it that one does not ever return from Nirvana to the other stages?

Does this not breach the intrinsic nature of cyclicality?
Only if you make the error of making nibbana into some kind of metaphysical crystal palace thats out there and that its a destination that we reach


How do you understand Nibbana?
Unbowed, Unbent, Unbroken

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests