Dhamma names?

Casual discussion amongst spiritual friends.
User avatar
Posts: 1341
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 2:53 pm

Dhamma names?

Postby Sumano » Thu Jul 16, 2009 8:27 pm

Are dhamma names forbidden for lay Theravadins?

(How) can I get a dhamma name?

User avatar
David N. Snyder
Site Admin
Posts: 10220
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:15 am
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada

Re: Dhamma names?

Postby David N. Snyder » Thu Jul 16, 2009 8:39 pm

I don't think so. Anagarika Dharmapala had one and he was a lay man all his life until about the last year when he ordained.

His dying words were, "may I be re-born 25 more times so that I can spread the Buddha-Dhamma." :bow: :bow: :bow:

Not sure how you could do it, but I would check with a venerable if you want a formal ceremony; perhaps in conjunction with a formal refuge ceremony.

User avatar
Posts: 14707
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:37 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: Dhamma names?

Postby mikenz66 » Thu Jul 16, 2009 8:47 pm

My impression is that it is uncommon for Theravadins to take Dhamma names unless they are ordained. However, some Western organisations do do this. But the whole thing of taking a Pali name is clearly a ('modern') post-Buddha's lifetime idea anyway. If it is inspiring to you, and doesn't cause any friction with the people you associate with, I don't see any problem.


User avatar
Posts: 6515
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
Location: Ellan Vannin

Re: Dhamma names?

Postby Cittasanto » Fri Jul 17, 2009 12:11 am

I did it!

fare enough I roughly translated the meaning of my actual name and not for any real reason other than some anonimity, but I have at times found it useful (when I wasn't being as headful as I should be and noticed it myself etc) as a reminder for practice, something like a conversation David wants to say F*** Y** TOS*** and punch his lights out, Manapa would do this though!
helps keep the me on the internet the me I am off line. (for the most part)
Blog, Suttas, Aj Chah, Facebook.

He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them.
But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion …
He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.
John Stuart Mill

Return to “Lounge”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests

Google Saffron, Theravada Search Engine