the ethics of lay teachers who charge money
Re: the ethics of lay teachers who charge money
the buddha and his disciples and so on and so on never charged so much as a single masaka so...
Re: the ethics of lay teachers who charge money
This/isnt/about/idealism.Kim O'Hara wrote:Zom, Pilgrim,
Idealism doesn't fill bellies.
If a teacher starves, he can no longer teach.
Kim
The/Buddha/said/that/Dhamma/is/to/be/given/as/a/gift,
NOT/bought/and/sold/like/a/commodity.
It/was/given/freely/to/humanity/by/the/Buddha
so/he/has/the/right/to/expect/that/from/us.
Its/not/ours/to/sell;/nor/can/we/make/any/claim/of/discovery:
only/the/Buddha/can/make/that/claim,/not/us.
If/a/lay/teacher/needs/to/support/their/life
nothing/is/stopping/them/from/working/at/a/job.
As/for/Dhamma/instruction,
it/would/be/acceptable/if/a/student,/out/of/gratitude,
gave/of/their/own/free/will
and/that/lay/teacher/then/accepted/it;
but/to/REQUIRE/payment/ie/charge/is/not/correct!
metta/
Last edited by manas on Thu Apr 18, 2013 11:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
To the Buddha-refuge i go; to the Dhamma-refuge i go; to the Sangha-refuge i go.
- retrofuturist
- Posts: 27854
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: the ethics of lay teachers who charge money
Greetings,
Well said, manas.
Metta,
Retro.
Well said, manas.
Metta,
Retro.
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
Re: the ethics of lay teachers who charge money
If you had achieved a stage of considering yourself having the ability to impart wisdom teaching of Buddhism, means one is able to live simply and moderately with ultimate joys of basic foods and simple shelter. There is no reason to charge for meditation lesson as this is inherent quality of all. The generous sharing and teaching of true dharma will develop even more insightfully beyond materialism. If the condition is not favorable to share with minimum expenses or without donor, there is no requirement to set up meditation class. Most essentially is to keep an extremely low cost so that everyone can enjoy and experience their inherent peace. The most favorable buddhism institution for meditation is those that does not charge a single cent as it does not give rise to any burden and welcome even the pauper to experience their own joys of meditation. There is nothing most precious than assisting anyone to become buddha
“Peace comes from within. Do not seek it without.”
― Gautama Buddha
“Peace comes from within. Do not seek it without.”
― Gautama Buddha
To become vegetarian is to step into the stream which leads to nirvana.
If you light a lamp for somebody, it will also brighten your path. He who experiences the unity of life sees his own Self in all beings, and all beings in his own Self.
If you light a lamp for somebody, it will also brighten your path. He who experiences the unity of life sees his own Self in all beings, and all beings in his own Self.
Re: the ethics of lay teachers who charge money
manas wrote:This/isnt/about/idealism.Kim O'Hara wrote:Zom, Pilgrim,
Idealism doesn't fill bellies.
If a teacher starves, he can no longer teach.
Kim
The/Buddha/said/that/Dhamma/is/to/be/given/as/a/gift,
NOT/bought/and/sold/like/a/commodity.
It/was/given/freely/to/humanity/by/the/Buddha
so/he/has/the/right/to/expect/that/from/us.
Its/not/ours/to/sell;/nor/can/we/make/any/claim/of/discovery:
only/the/Buddha/can/make/that/claim,/not/us.
If/a/lay/teacher/needs/to/support/their/life
nothing/is/stopping/them/from/working/at/a/job.
As/for/Dhamma/instruction,
it/would/be/acceptable/if/a/student,/out/of/gratitude,
gave/of/their/own/free/will
and/that/lay/teacher/then/accepted/it;
but/to/REQUIRE/payment/ie/charge/is/not/correct!
metta/
is my computer not coding correctly or is this written with hundreds of back slashes interspersed between the words???
anyway. getting money by donation is totally legit, even if it's strongly suggested. the only time i see a problem is if it's a standard business style transaction: "pay X amount of dollars for X amount of dhamma. no money means no dhamma for you!"
that's not okay.
but even if a teacher strongly hinted that they needed money: "i'm really short on cash these days..." i would probably just give them some as long as they didn't say or imply that they would refuse teaching if they didn't receive payment. if i could walk out and return again for more lessons without paying, i would donate some money. however if they blatantly said that they would not teach if they were not paid i would walk away without giving it second thought. i'm pretty sure there's even sutta support where the buddha (or some important canonical figure) clearly states that the dhamma should not be charged for.
Re: the ethics of lay teachers who charge money
Teaching Dhamma is Dana: the greatest Dana. When someone is asking money for teaching Dhamma, he/she is trading Dhamma. It may not be "unethical" but it does not sound right.
It does not make any sense because teaching about Dana including Dhammadana is itself a part of Dhamma-teaching.
"Selling Dhamma" is such a terrible idea, I wonder how it can arise in the mind of a Dhamma teacher. There must be some conditions for its arising.
It does not make any sense because teaching about Dana including Dhammadana is itself a part of Dhamma-teaching.
"Selling Dhamma" is such a terrible idea, I wonder how it can arise in the mind of a Dhamma teacher. There must be some conditions for its arising.
Last edited by SamKR on Sat Apr 20, 2013 4:38 am, edited 5 times in total.
Re: the ethics of lay teachers who charge money
I feel if any "Dhamma-teacher" is charging money for teaching Dhamma, he/she is not a genuine Dhamma-teacher; need to avoid them. This criteria makes the number of genuine Dhamma-teachers even less when we already have a dearth of Dhamma-teachers.
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2013 4:47 am
Re: the ethics of lay teachers who charge money
Agree. Dhamma is to be given as a gift not to be traded or as a favor expecting donations or support in return for the monastics, as lay ppl have returned their gratitude by providing them with the 4 requisites i.e. food, monastery, clothing & medicine. So, how can they charge for their time & teaching Buddha's dhamma? Sounds to me like salemanship. Today there are many other lay teachers charging using buddha's dhamma & meditation method but that is their business but for sangha members wearing the robes to charge is unprecedented & imo wrong livelihood! Buddha didn't charge a penny only out of his compassion & at the request of a brahma deva to teach. Btw, they are not expected to teach if they are not willing to teach for free. The 4 requisites are given free to sangha not expecting a teaching in return but in the spirit of dana. They should teach without any expectation of support, to gain followers, material gains & possessions or to pursue their ambitions or agenda (if any). Trading dhamma in the name of for the fun of it, is giving a bad impression on the Sangha & corrupts the spirituality of the Sangha. I respect the previous thread is closed, so no further comments. Thank you.SamKR wrote:I feel if any "Dhamma-teacher" is charging money for teaching Dhamma, he/she is not a genuine Dhamma-teacher; need to avoid them. This criteria makes the number of genuine Dhamma-teachers even less when we already have a dearth of Dhamma-teachers.
- Beautiful Breath
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 10:25 am
- Location: South West England, UK
- Contact:
Re: the ethics of lay teachers who charge money
No excuse for charging, its disgusting!
If you're short of cash get a job for goodness sake, don't charge for imparting the Dhamma.
How anyone can excuse this is beyond belief...it stinks of moral bancruptcy.
If you're short of cash get a job for goodness sake, don't charge for imparting the Dhamma.
How anyone can excuse this is beyond belief...it stinks of moral bancruptcy.
- Vakresvara
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sun May 26, 2013 3:57 am
Re: the ethics of lay teachers who charge money
Hello everyone and this is my first posting. I felt the need or compelled to write an opinion over this matter, due to my own previous experiences in life. Coming from other religion schools, and discovering Dhamma as the greatest gift, provided me with the great realization, in my search for true practice.
The greatest teachers, whom are well known to be enlightened beings; Arahants, have not ever charged for teaching the Dhamma (Teachings of the Buddha), they gave themselves without reserves to others, by walking the path with huge sacrifices, and when they attained the greatest levels of self-realization, they distributed to others freely, without materialistic conditions, and we should remember, that Lord Buddha said prior to his passing away; “One who sees the Dhamma sees me and one who sees me sees the Dhamma”.
They understood their responsibilities, and carried them out by Eating a Little, Sleeping a Little a Chatting a Little, a life of renunciation, reducing every possible way to infringe on others the burden of taking care for them. Dhamma is not a mean to get support; Dhamma is a way to benefit and offer support to others.
With no intention to offend anyone, and with the only purpose to share my experience with others, I wrote this posting, please, forgive me if in any way I caused you any discomfort.
Vakresvara
The greatest teachers, whom are well known to be enlightened beings; Arahants, have not ever charged for teaching the Dhamma (Teachings of the Buddha), they gave themselves without reserves to others, by walking the path with huge sacrifices, and when they attained the greatest levels of self-realization, they distributed to others freely, without materialistic conditions, and we should remember, that Lord Buddha said prior to his passing away; “One who sees the Dhamma sees me and one who sees me sees the Dhamma”.
They understood their responsibilities, and carried them out by Eating a Little, Sleeping a Little a Chatting a Little, a life of renunciation, reducing every possible way to infringe on others the burden of taking care for them. Dhamma is not a mean to get support; Dhamma is a way to benefit and offer support to others.
With no intention to offend anyone, and with the only purpose to share my experience with others, I wrote this posting, please, forgive me if in any way I caused you any discomfort.
Vakresvara
Re: the ethics of lay teachers who charge money
Well said Vakresvara!
Some teachers are lay practitioners - as is my teacher Patrick Kearney - and, although having to support himself and wife - he only takes donations, and does not charge a fee.
With metta
Chris
Some teachers are lay practitioners - as is my teacher Patrick Kearney - and, although having to support himself and wife - he only takes donations, and does not charge a fee.
With metta
Chris
---The trouble is that you think you have time---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
Re: the ethics of lay teachers who charge money
I said this very early in the thread ...
In an ideal world, no-one would have to pay for any knowledge - but we're a long way from that.
In a very-good world, students would be so grateful for the teaching they received that the teacher would never have to worry about where his/her next meal was coming from - but I don't see that happening either.
I do agree that teaching the dhamma/dharma in order to get rich is a bad thing. I am not at all sure that it is never a good thing for a lay teacher to charge so that they can afford time to keep teaching the dhamma.
YMMV ... and probably will, going by the general trend of opinions expressed here. So be it.
Kim
... and I still reckon it's true.Kim OHara wrote:We're negotiating our way through a meeting of cultures (I was going to say 'clash' but it's not that bad).
In (most) traditionally-Buddhist countries, the sangha were overwhelmingly the source of dhamma (and wider education and medical services) and were supported by donations from nearly everyone in the community, so it was unnecessary and unfair for them to ask for payment from individuals for any of their services.
In the west, there are multiple sources of religious teaching, education, medical services, etc, and none of them is supported by more than a minority of the population they serve, so asking for payment is both necessary and fair.
I doubt that the traditionally-Buddhist system will ever replace the western system in the west, so we are going to have to get used to different ways of supporting our teachers, lay and ordained. And I suspect we will be working them out on a case-by-case basis, as we are here.
Kim
In an ideal world, no-one would have to pay for any knowledge - but we're a long way from that.
In a very-good world, students would be so grateful for the teaching they received that the teacher would never have to worry about where his/her next meal was coming from - but I don't see that happening either.
I do agree that teaching the dhamma/dharma in order to get rich is a bad thing. I am not at all sure that it is never a good thing for a lay teacher to charge so that they can afford time to keep teaching the dhamma.
YMMV ... and probably will, going by the general trend of opinions expressed here. So be it.
Kim
Re: the ethics of lay teachers who charge money
To identify yourself as a Buddhist teacher and expect financial income from it, one would be best served to spend a year or two exploring what your motivation is.
Perhaps even meditate on some of these questions:
Why do you want to be a teacher?
Would you still want to teach if there was no money involved?
What are the benefits of being a Buddhist teacher?
How do you know you are qualified to be a teacher? Do you have significant experience beyond American style or mindfulness teachings?
What specific type of student are you qualified to help?
It is a serious task to know what is beneficial for another person's mind, and to be skilled enough to know which practices that can best help another.
Perhaps even meditate on some of these questions:
Why do you want to be a teacher?
Would you still want to teach if there was no money involved?
What are the benefits of being a Buddhist teacher?
How do you know you are qualified to be a teacher? Do you have significant experience beyond American style or mindfulness teachings?
What specific type of student are you qualified to help?
It is a serious task to know what is beneficial for another person's mind, and to be skilled enough to know which practices that can best help another.
Re: the ethics of lay teachers who charge money
alan... wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2013 2:06 amI had to look it up. According to the ultimate source of knowledge, Wikipedia, those aren't backslashes. They are just slashes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backslashmanas wrote: is this written with hundreds of back slashes interspersed between the words???
Atāṇo loko anabhissaro...
Yena yena hi maññanti tato taṃ hoti aññathā,
Yena yena hi maññanti tato taṃ hoti aññathā,
Re: the ethics of lay teachers who charge money
I am basically in agreement with thisBeautiful Breath wrote: ↑Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:27 am No excuse for charging, its disgusting!
If you're short of cash get a job for goodness sake, don't charge for imparting the Dhamma.
How anyone can excuse this is beyond belief...it stinks of moral bancruptcy.