would learning jhana solely from sutta be possible?

The cultivation of calm or tranquility and the development of concentration
User avatar
Jerrod Lopes
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:11 am

Re: would learning jhana solely from sutta be possible?

Post by Jerrod Lopes » Thu Jan 17, 2013 3:47 am

Richard,

The person that experienced this was interested in square breathing techniques and dwelling on thoughts of gratitude at the suggestion of a therapist he was seeing at the time as a way to deal with some PTSD due to the terror attacks in the US on 09-11-01. He kept at the breathing practice to relieve stress. Eventually he developed a small interest in spirituality to also help deal with his problem. He started experiencing some interesting and sometimes even startling things so he looked to the meditation experts, namely Buddhists for advice. One of his first few posts on a "Buddhist" forum was to ask what these strange meditation sessions and the resultant effects were all about. The near unanimous replies were the first he had ever known of the word jhana. Up until then, meditation was just meditation to him... a way to relax and relieve stress through concentrated effort on breathing is all he thought of it.

User avatar
tiltbillings
Posts: 23044
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am

Re: would learning jhana solely from sutta be possible?

Post by tiltbillings » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:15 am

Jerrod Lopes wrote: However, I find that one doesn't even really need knowledge of Buddhism in this life to go into the jhana states. Anyone can do it. After much reflection I come to the same conclusion time and time again. It is much easier to get into jhana states when one isn't aware of their existence. It follows then in this line of understanding that people having defilements such as they do, study of the jhanas may actually make getting to the jahna states more difficult. My advice to people regarding jhanas has always been to forget about them. You'll know what you need to know about jhanas when the time comes. I am sorry to be contradictory. :namaste:
Jhana level of concentration is not unique to the Buddha's teachings. And what is interesting about these levels of concentration is that they can easily be colored by beliefs and expectations.

As for your advice: it is probably the best advice given here in quite sometime concerning jhana.
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12

This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.

“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723

SarathW
Posts: 10184
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:49 am

Re: would learning jhana solely from sutta be possible?

Post by SarathW » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:15 am

Many people experience mind body separation (Nama rupa Paricheda Nana) without realising that they are experiencing a type of meditative experience.
As a young child I experience this many times. They last only for few seconds. I thought that I was going mad and complained to my mother.
My niece also experienced the same and they take her to the doctors and the doctors said that there is nothing wrong with her.
I remember Mrs. Robert Holmes A Court talking about the same experience when she lost her husband Mr.H.A.Court (once Australia's richest man).
Sports people such as Tiger Wood also may have some level of onepointedness.

Onepointedness is a universal mental faculty and we all possess it that is why we all can realise Nirvana.

I know about this only now, as I have studied it and have a better undestandigng of it.

Meditation was there before Buddha’s time.

Please read attached for more info.

http://www.buddhanet.net/pdf_file/printguna.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I may be wrong, if please correct me.

PS: As a child I was very much in to Buddha's teaching.
“As the lamp consumes oil, the path realises Nibbana”

SarathW
Posts: 10184
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:49 am

Re: would learning jhana solely from sutta be possible?

Post by SarathW » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:17 am

Hey Tilt
You are reading my mind! see the time. :twothumbsup:
“As the lamp consumes oil, the path realises Nibbana”

mynameisadahn
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 6:35 pm

Re: would learning jhana solely from sutta be possible?

Post by mynameisadahn » Thu Jan 17, 2013 3:16 pm

To answer the OP's question directly. Yes.

You can learn directly from the suttas. My example would be Ayya Khema. If you are interested in more explicit discussion about the jhanas then I would suggest googling her name (she was a buddhist nun, originally from germany, who passed away several years ago). As I understand, she learned jhanas from the suttas herself, before she was later told she did it correctly (or something like that). Many of her talks can be found online in audio file form. She appears to have done what you are interested in doing, so she would seem like a good source.

Personally, I really like her dhamma talks and find them very helpful. Learning about the jhanas directly may not be really emphasized by many of the posters in this forum, though, so perhaps Ayya Khema's approach is a bit different and more focused on teaching the jhanas in advance, and trying in some way to get into them, before the experiences actually happen.

To the OP, also, I would suggest that this forum -- while a great forum -- isn't going to be focused on explicitly discussing different jhanas and teachings of how to get into them. (IME). I have seen you post at least one other question about the jhanas. If you are taking a somewhat different approach and wanting to learn more explicitly about the absorptions, you may want to branch out some in your research.

This isn't disparaging anyone here. I am just answering the OP, who asked a very reasonable question, even if some people here think other approaches are better.

alan...
Posts: 824
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:37 pm

Re: would learning jhana solely from sutta be possible?

Post by alan... » Thu Jan 17, 2013 6:22 pm

mynameisadahn wrote:To answer the OP's question directly. Yes.

You can learn directly from the suttas. My example would be Ayya Khema. If you are interested in more explicit discussion about the jhanas then I would suggest googling her name (she was a buddhist nun, originally from germany, who passed away several years ago). As I understand, she learned jhanas from the suttas herself, before she was later told she did it correctly (or something like that). Many of her talks can be found online in audio file form. She appears to have done what you are interested in doing, so she would seem like a good source.

Personally, I really like her dhamma talks and find them very helpful. Learning about the jhanas directly may not be really emphasized by many of the posters in this forum, though, so perhaps Ayya Khema's approach is a bit different and more focused on teaching the jhanas in advance, and trying in some way to get into them, before the experiences actually happen.

To the OP, also, I would suggest that this forum -- while a great forum -- isn't going to be focused on explicitly discussing different jhanas and teachings of how to get into them. (IME). I have seen you post at least one other question about the jhanas. If you are taking a somewhat different approach and wanting to learn more explicitly about the absorptions, you may want to branch out some in your research.

This isn't disparaging anyone here. I am just answering the OP, who asked a very reasonable question, even if some people here think other approaches are better.
i love ayya khema so much. she is one of my favorite buddhist authors. i'll look into that thanks.

why do you feel this forum is not the place? all i notice is a lot of vipassana people who don't think it's necessary but other than that i've gotten some good info. what approach should i go with?

User avatar
Jerrod Lopes
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:11 am

Re: would learning jhana solely from sutta be possible?

Post by Jerrod Lopes » Fri Jan 18, 2013 3:45 am

To be clear, at least for me, I never said jhanas weren't important. I think they are vital for one who really wants to realize nibbana one day. I also think this level of absorption is extremely helpful in gaining the insight needed to understand anatta, rebirth, kamma and other things. What I WAS saying was that a desire for jhana will impede you from getting jhana. Expectations will distract and distort your meditations until it is near impossible to get to these states. This is why people will tell you about jhana or jhana like experiences when they were children. It is because there isn't this desire and misconceptions about what jhanas are and will do for you. I known dozens, if not more people over the years discuss a desire to get jhanas. They feel like its some sort of Buddhist merit badge to be worn proudly, to boast "I have known the jhanas!" And invariably these people go away unfulfilled and still wanting.

I went to flight school when I was younger. The first time up in the air I was asking the instructor about barrel rolls and loops, stalls, all kinds of advanced aerobatics. He pretty much said to me that if I didn't know how to get the plane from its parking spot on the apron, to the runway and into the sky, how on Earth could I ever hope to do all of those things? And in a haste to do them, I would probably crash and die trying to take off. Maybe not the best analogy, but I hope that helps explain. I've also never classed myself as vippasana this or samadhi that. If you box yourself into one thing or the other you've conditioned yourself to be unable to do the other one(s). Best of luck and be well. Wishing shiny happy nimittas for you, always.

User avatar
Doshin
Posts: 99
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 8:01 am

Re: would learning jhana solely from sutta be possible?

Post by Doshin » Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:03 am

SarathW wrote:...
Please read attached for more info.
You link to a book containing 252 pages, what in particular are you thinking about, in this context ?
SarathW wrote: ...
http://www.buddhanet.net/pdf_file/printguna.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
If reading on a e-reader, I would recommend (same book different formatting):
http://www.buddhanet.net/pdf_file/scrnguna.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

_/\_
Knowing about dhamma, does not imply knowing dhamma

User avatar
Anagarika
Posts: 915
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 11:25 pm

Re: would learning jhana solely from sutta be possible?

Post by Anagarika » Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:25 pm

Jerrod some really good stuff you're contributing here. Thanks for sharing this, as it can really make a difference when intelligent people kindly and thoughtfully share important insights.

I'm not one to get all Zenny about these issues, but it's reminiscent of Shunryu Suzuki's admonition about "beginner's mind" and possibilities. I have known Thai Bhikkhus to express frustration that they are not stream enterers....I've had the sense that the striving toward stream entry is the impediment that they are building, walling themselves off from authentic jhana states.

mynameisadahn
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 6:35 pm

Re: would learning jhana solely from sutta be possible?

Post by mynameisadahn » Fri Jan 18, 2013 4:24 pm

alan... wrote: why do you feel this forum is not the place? all i notice is a lot of vipassana people who don't think it's necessary but other than that i've gotten some good info. what approach should i go with?
I think this is a great forum, but as I said, I have seen you ask at least two questions about jhanas and most of the responses are saying, basically 'don't worry about them, don't think about them'.

I am not an expert, so I am not defending one approach over the other regarding the jhanas. There are a lot of knowledgable people here, it seems, saying don't worry about the jhanas. However, if you feel that you want to learn about these directly, and explore actually approaching jhanas more directly, then many of the posters in this forum are going to continue to tell you 'don't worry about jhanas, don't strive for them.'

Ultimately, it is up to the individual to pick their teachers, and you are responsible for that. Myself, I like Ayya Khema's approach and those of others like her, who explicitly discuss jhanas and encourage appropriate striving for jhanas.

There was a suggestion earlier that even attempting to strive for jhanas would make it impossible. If 'striving' in any sense for a jhana made it impossible, then what are retreatants at Pa Auk Sayadaw's center doing? Not obtaining jhanas?

There are different viewpoints on whether to explicitly try to obtain jhanas in one's practice. And I think that should be respected more.

The OP, Alan, is taking a very reasonable view and many teachers would answer his questions. But here, there is a great deal of discouraging rather than answering the question "can you learn jhanas from the suttas" which is a very interesting question. I would have really appreciated seeing a discussion of that question.

I hope that if other posters disagree with my views that they see I am encouraging respecting different views on this issue, and also encouraging engaging the OP's actual, stated question.

Personally, I prefer a 'concentration first, then vipassana' method. However, I arrived at my preferred meditation methods (like metta, instead of using the breath as an object) partly due to my own idiosyncracies. I have an abundance of ill-will that needs correcting.

User avatar
tiltbillings
Posts: 23044
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am

Re: would learning jhana solely from sutta be possible?

Post by tiltbillings » Fri Jan 18, 2013 5:11 pm

mynameisadahn wrote: Myself, I like Ayya Khema's approach and those of others like her, who explicitly discuss jhanas and encourage appropriate striving for jhanas. . .
There is a world of difference between working directly with an experienced teacher and getting advice on an internet forum.
There was a suggestion earlier that even attempting to strive for jhanas would make it impossible. If 'striving' in any sense for a jhana made it impossible, then what are retreatants at Pa Auk Sayadaw's center doing? Not obtaining jhanas?
Again, it depends upon the context. Working at a retreat with an experienced teacher is one thing, working at home with books and forum advice is another. It is not a matter of "Don't try this at home." It is, however, a matter of realistic expectations of trying this at home, both in terms of what to expect and the pitfalls, of which there are a fair few. Ideally, one would have a teacher with whom one could consult as needed, or barring that because such a teacher is not available in one's location, then attending a retreat or two with a qualified teacher, which would help give a good basis for continuing at home, would be a very good way to go. If that is not possible, then work from the books that carefully outline the practice written by experiernced teachers. But keep in mind the best advice is do the practice, be consistent with it and don't worry so much about the results. In doing the practice itself, there is a great deal that can be learned, and one needs to always keep in mind that the bottom line is that it is not about getting.
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12

This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.

“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723

mynameisadahn
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 6:35 pm

Re: would learning jhana solely from sutta be possible?

Post by mynameisadahn » Fri Jan 18, 2013 5:56 pm

tiltbillings wrote: Working at a retreat with an experienced teacher is one thing, working at home with books and forum advice is another. It is not a matter of "Don't try this at home." It is, however, a matter of realistic expectations of trying this at home, both in terms of what to expect and the pitfalls, of which there are a fair few.
I would agree with your comments, I believe. There is a great deal of personal responsibility placed on an individual who tries to follow meditation instructions from an online dharma talk, forum, or written source. I certainly wanted to emphasize this personal responsibility in my own posts on this thread.

Unfortunately, it can be hard finding some typs of meditation instruction, in person, without significant travel. Or, even if one has a good in-person teacher, you may not have the ability to do longer retreats (this is my situation). So it really comes down to the indiviudal, making an intelligent and wise choice given their resources, time, etc. about the most effective ways to have a practice that alleviates suffering. And, like you said, what is possible in this situation - on retreat, off retreat, etc.

User avatar
Jerrod Lopes
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:11 am

Re: would learning jhana solely from sutta be possible?

Post by Jerrod Lopes » Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:06 pm

I answered the OP directly. I'll state it again.

Not likely, improbable, ill-advised, but not impossible.

The Buddha wasn't a Buddhist. What did he do? He tried different things until it worked.

What I am seeing here seems to be a cyclical debate between those who say you do need all the toys, names, and terminology and those who say you don't need these things. In the end, each person has to explore and see for themselves.
It might be good first, and a teacher would perhaps ask this in person in response to the OP; how long have you been meditating? Do you meditate often, or only occasionally? What do you know about the 4 Noble Truths? How did you come to be interested in the middle way?

Personally, I don't see discouraging the practice of jhanas as a bad thing when we don't know whether the person asking about them has been meditating twice daily for hours on end for years and years, or just picked up a dhamma pamphlet someone dropped in a shopping mall yesterday. I gave the flight school analogy above. What is most important here is giving the person who asked the question the best answer for the given situation. There are no hard and fast rules for giving answers to anything in life. Just a sone person cares to meditate this way and name each part of that process a different label, another just sits and breathes and couldn't care less about what it's called. Everythign is different, everyone is different. What is the same is that trying to ATTAIN jhanas for the wrong reasons without a proper foundation ends in disappointment and frustration.

But yes... you could maybe learn jhanas from the suttas. Yet I still wonder...how are you to empty your mind and let it be still if you're remembering what a book told you someone else did?

Kenshou
Posts: 1030
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:03 am
Location: Minneapolis, MN

Re: would learning jhana solely from sutta be possible?

Post by Kenshou » Sat Jan 19, 2013 1:00 am

Well, you could also say "how are you to empty your mind and let it be still if you're remembering what a teacher told you you ought to be doing?" That's also a potential source of non-productive distracting thoughts. A certain finesse is required, regardless of the origin of one's meditation instruction.

It is sort of an ironic predicament, how meditation instruction or method itself can become an object of worry or doubt, which then makes it even harder. As a person who is naturally driven to lay ideas out in words in just the right way, it's an irony I've been pretty cozy with.

User avatar
Cittasanto
Posts: 6625
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
Location: Ellan Vannin
Contact:

Re: would learning jhana solely from sutta be possible?

Post by Cittasanto » Sat Jan 19, 2013 1:06 am

Kenshou wrote: A certain finesse is required, regardless of the origin of one's meditation instruction.
:anjali:
Blog, Suttas, Aj Chah, Facebook.

He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them.
But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion …
...
He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.
John Stuart Mill

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests