Disrobing

Discussion of ordination, the Vinaya and monastic life. How and where to ordain? Bhikkhuni ordination etc.
rowyourboat
Posts: 1952
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:29 pm
Location: London, UK

Disrobing

Post by rowyourboat » Tue Oct 25, 2011 11:05 am

I would like to know the reasons why monks disrobe. Have you disrobed and if so why? No judgments here- just trying to understand. Thanks.

with metta

Matheesha
With Metta

Karuna
Mudita
& Upekkha

User avatar
retrofuturist
Site Admin
Posts: 20130
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Disorbing

Post by retrofuturist » Tue Oct 25, 2011 11:07 am

Greetings,

And should it pertain to anyone's situation, I would be interested to hear of anyone's subsequent reasons for re-robing!

Metta,
Retro. :)
"Do not force others, including children, by any means whatsoever, to adopt your views, whether by authority, threat, money, propaganda, or even education." - Ven. Thich Nhat Hanh

"The uprooting of identity is seen by the noble ones as pleasurable; but this contradicts what the whole world sees." (Snp 3.12)

"One discerns wrong view as wrong view, and right view as right view. This is one's right view." (MN 117)

pegembara
Posts: 1300
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 8:39 am

Re: Disorbing

Post by pegembara » Tue Oct 25, 2011 3:02 pm

Anyone seen the movie Samsara?
And what is right speech? Abstaining from lying, from divisive speech, from abusive speech, & from idle chatter: This is called right speech.

User avatar
DNS
Site Admin
Posts: 11834
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:15 am
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, Estados Unidos de América
Contact:

Re: Disorbing

Post by DNS » Tue Oct 25, 2011 3:26 pm

Ven. Dhammika, in one of his articles estimates that (of those who disrobe) 70% disrobe over issues with lust and cravings. The other 30% disrobe due to boredom.

The successful ones who are able to stick with it, have gone beyond or mostly beyond the issues over cravings and keep themselves occupied with meditation, writing, gardening, and teaching.

User avatar
Zom
Posts: 2158
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 6:38 pm
Location: Russia, Saint-Petersburg
Contact:

Re: Disorbing

Post by Zom » Tue Oct 25, 2011 6:05 pm

:goodpost:

I would add a little bit:

Buddha said in SN that monks, who don't restrain themselves in the area of 6 senses, don't practise moderate eating, don't practise meditation - have a possibility to disrobe. But those who do all that - they have no such possibility.

Jhana4
Posts: 1309
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2011 5:20 pm
Location: U.S.A., Northeast

Re: Disorbing

Post by Jhana4 » Tue Oct 25, 2011 6:25 pm

Zom wrote::goodpost:

I would add a little bit:

Buddha said in SN that monks, who don't restrain themselves in the area of 6 senses, don't practice moderate eating, don't practice meditation - have a possibility to disrobe. But those who do all that - they have no such possibility.
That makes sense, being able to devote most of your time to those things are what being a monk has to offer, uniquely. If a person isn't applying themselves to those things then they are depriving themselves pointlessly.
In reading the scriptures, there are two kinds of mistakes:
One mistake is to cling to the literal text and miss the inner principles.
The second mistake is to recognize the principles but not apply them to your own mind, so that you waste time and just make them into causes of entanglement.

User avatar
Goofaholix
Posts: 2978
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 3:49 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: Disorbing

Post by Goofaholix » Tue Oct 25, 2011 7:39 pm

rowyourboat wrote:I would like to know the reasons why monks disrobe. Have you disrobed and if so why? No judgments here- just trying to understand. Thanks.

with metta

Matheesha
I disorbed, and am no longer an orb.

Seriously though my ordination was planned to be only for 3 months and prior to getting married as is common in Thailand.

In SE Asia (sri lanka possibly an exception being a monk is not considered a lifetime vocation for most, an extended retreat instead perhaps, i don't think this is a good thing).

If my wife to be had changed her mind I'd have quite happily stayed on though.
“Peace is within oneself to be found in the same place as agitation and suffering. It is not found in a forest or on a hilltop, nor is it given by a teacher. Where you experience suffering, you can also find freedom from suffering. Trying to run away from suffering is actually to run toward it.” ― Ajahn Chah

Gena1480
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 1:36 am

Re: Disorbing

Post by Gena1480 » Wed Nov 30, 2011 6:39 pm

this teaching should not be available to lay people

User avatar
Bhikkhu Pesala
Posts: 3743
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Disorbing

Post by Bhikkhu Pesala » Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:03 pm

Gena1480 wrote:this teaching should not be available to lay people
There is no esoteric teaching in Buddhism — at least not in the Theravāða. The Vinaya is open for lay people to study if they wish to.

Should Lay Persons Learn the Vinaya?
This section explains the meaning of the Mangala Dhamma “well-trained in discipline” in relation to a lay person’s Vinaya. Lay people have a natural discipline called “Good conduct” (sucarita vinaya), and “Virtuous conduct” (ācāra vinaya), which they should try to maintain in full with faith and diligence. This ethical conduct was prescribed for the laity by the Buddha, so they do not need to learn the Vinaya for monks.

However, wise lay persons who want to promote the Buddha’s teachings, and are well versed in their own discipline, do need to learn the monks’ Vinaya. Why? Those who are well-trained in the householder’s discipline become truly good people, so their minds and motives are good. If they are well controlled by the lay person’s discipline, after learning the monks’ Vinaya, they will not use their knowledge unwisely. They will not defile themselves with impure physical, vocal, and mental actions. They will not accumulate evil motives and evil kammas because of this new knowledge. In the commentary it is mentioned that a wise, learned brahmin, after listening to the monks’ Vinaya rules in detail, developed a clear mind and strong faith in the Sangha. He appreciated the power and significance of the monks’ Vinaya as clear understanding had revealed its profundity.

One day a devoted brahmin heard the monks reciting their Vinaya rules. Appreciating the benefits of these numerous rules he entered the Sangha. Thus one’s own attitude and motive are crucial to evaluate the knowledge of Vinaya rules and the diverse conduct of monks.

The way for a lay person to study the Vinaya is first to learn and practise the lay person’s Vinaya, which gives culture, wisdom, and knowledge. A lay person must be dedicated to observing lay ethics with perfect integrity. If integrity is lacking, a lay person, though learned in ethics, becomes a hypocrite with sham morality. He or she becomes a bad person. This type of lay person, who learns the monks’ Vinaya, will develop a fault-finding attitude. Seeing only the offences and weaknesses of monks, he or she will blame, slander, and abuse them. So there is no benefit for such a lay person in learning the monks’ Vinaya. Since he or she fails to learn and practise the lay person’s Vinaya well, he or she lacks fundamental virtues and a skilful mental attitude. So it is futile to learn the monks’ Vinaya, since he or she will criticise the conduct of wayward monks, interfering in the affairs of others. Such a person who quotes the Vinaya texts and blames the monks, makes evil kamma because he or she lacks the virtues of a good and moral person. Due to these defects he or she takes a superior stance, uttering words of condemnation and slander. Thus, grave evil kammas result from his or her learning.
BlogPāli FontsIn This Very LifeBuddhist ChroniclesSoftware (Upasampadā: 24th June, 1979)

User avatar
theravada_guy
Posts: 208
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 2:06 am

Re: Disorbing

Post by theravada_guy » Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:15 pm

Bhikkhu Pesala wrote:
Gena1480 wrote:this teaching should not be available to lay people
There is no esoteric teaching in Buddhism — at least not in the Theravāða. The Vinaya is open for lay people to study if they wish to.
Thankfully it is open to the laity to study because I really enjoy studying the ways of the bhikkhus and bhikkhunis.

And, I agree with Goofaholix. I don't like the idea of Going Forth with the intention that it is only temporary, either. I can understand someone who takes ordination, but then realizes it's not for him/her, but not the whole temporary ordination thing.
With metta,

Justin

Buckwheat
Posts: 958
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 12:39 am
Location: California USA

Re: Disorbing

Post by Buckwheat » Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:11 am

Temporary ordination is more productive than going to college to join a fraternity.
Sotthī hontu nirantaraṃ - May you forever be well.

Gena1480
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 1:36 am

Re: Disorbing

Post by Gena1480 » Thu Dec 01, 2011 4:43 am

it is matter of right speech
the teaching are available
go ahead and study then
it should be no concern to laity for reason of disrobing
since they did not put the robes on.

User avatar
theravada_guy
Posts: 208
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 2:06 am

Re: Disorbing

Post by theravada_guy » Thu Dec 01, 2011 7:17 am

Buckwheat wrote:Temporary ordination is more productive than going to college to join a fraternity.
I also agree with this, Buckwheat. Maybe it's not so much of a bad thing after all. I never really thought about it in terms like that. I know in the suttas there is the case of the bhikkhu who kept disrobing and re-robing, and finally the Buddha put a limit on as to how much a person could ordain in one lifetime. I forget which sutta though.
With metta,

Justin

User avatar
Bhikkhu Pesala
Posts: 3743
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Disorbing

Post by Bhikkhu Pesala » Thu Dec 01, 2011 7:28 am

theravada_guy wrote:And, I agree with Goofaholix. I don't like the idea of Going Forth with the intention that it is only temporary, either. I can understand someone who takes ordination, but then realizes it's not for him/her, but not the whole temporary ordination thing.
As with all things, it depends very much on the intention.
  • Right at the bottom of the scale there are those who ordain just to collect money
  • Then there are those who ordain to gain respect in society or make merit
  • And there are those who ordain to practice meditation seriously while they still have the opportunity, knowing that after marriage it won't be feasible. There are even those who are married who take temporary ordination to practice meditation for a few weeks only. Even so, they may gain significant insights or better if they are wise and practice seriously.
No one should ever discourage even temporary ordination as to do so would be to make obstructive kamma for oneself. The only caveat is that it should be done for the right reasons. Ordaining for ignoble reasons may result in more demerit than merit.

Ultimately, we monks are all ordained only temporarily — just for a bit longer than most. We can disrobe at any time if the mind changes, or we may have to if we fall into an offence of defeat. Though that is not our wish or intention, such things can happen depending on circumstances.

The real difference between individuals, whether lay persons, “temporary” monks, or “permanent” monks, lies in their determination to attain the Path in this very life, and whether or not they have genuine spiritual urgency (samvega) about the dangers of samsāra.

AFAIK there is no limit to the number of times a bhikkhu may disrobe and be re-ordained. The monk in question ordained seven times and disrobed six times. Finally, he attained Arahantship.
BlogPāli FontsIn This Very LifeBuddhist ChroniclesSoftware (Upasampadā: 24th June, 1979)

User avatar
theravada_guy
Posts: 208
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 2:06 am

Re: Disorbing

Post by theravada_guy » Thu Dec 01, 2011 7:51 am

Thank you, Bhante, for that post. It changed my mind on temporary ordination. I can see your point that all monks are technically only temporarily ordained. Even if they never disrobe, death can come at any moment.

That monk that disrobed so many times and attained Arahantship, I guess I read somewhere where that set the limit that you could only take on the robes a total of seven times, but I could be wrong. Maybe the Buddha never explicitly mentioned that. I'm not sure.
With metta,

Justin

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bhante Sudewa Thero and 26 guests