It's a Tibetan fox (Vulpes ferrilata). Carry on.tiltbillings wrote:I don't think that is a fox and this thread is vacillating between seriousness and gawd only knows what.plwk wrote:
adosa
It's a Tibetan fox (Vulpes ferrilata). Carry on.tiltbillings wrote:I don't think that is a fox and this thread is vacillating between seriousness and gawd only knows what.plwk wrote:
Hmmm, it's a good thing I'M not a moderator, or my response may well have been the even more frown-inducing "just go away".PeterB wrote:Frankly if I was a mod, particularly if I were Tilt, I would have said " f*** this for game of soldiers " and departed some time ago.
That's alright though... because at least it's contained here, and the Dhamma topics that are taking place across the forum presently (and there's quite a lot if you look around) have been reasonably quarantined from such postings.Mawkish1983 wrote:So many posts, so little Dhamma
Sorry, I wasn't clear, I was talking about my own recent activity on Dhammawheel.retrofuturist wrote:[T]he Dhamma topics that are taking place across the forum presently (and there's quite a lot if you look around) have been reasonably quarantined from such postings.
Thanks for the info. It is a rather interstingly unusual looking animal.adosa wrote:It's a Tibetan fox (Vulpes ferrilata). Carry on.tiltbillings wrote:I don't think that is a fox and this thread is vacillating between seriousness and gawd only knows what.plwk wrote:
adosa
tiltbillings wrote:This fits under the improving DW's knowledge base of foxes in the world.
Careful, Tilt, or you'll be reborn as a fox 500 times... Ooops, wrong Forum...tiltbillings wrote: This fits under the improving DW's knowledge base of foxes in the world.
Hi Dan,Dan74 wrote:This is relevant to the What's Wrong with Buddha Nature thread http://dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=7716 and the whole Dhammic free-for-all.
I think it would be worthwhile to have clear guidelines for the Dhammic free-for-all forum which would encourage discussion of the teachings of all Buddhist schools in a constructive respectful atmosphere staying on topic rather than sliding into sectarian polemics and nastiness. Substantiated criticism is of course important and valuable but not ax grinding and outright slander - it is offensive to those of us who cherish these teachings and hold the masters who taught them in highest respect. In the end, the threads descend into wrangling of no relevance to anyone's practice.
I suggest either tighten up the guidelines or scrap that forum altogether.