Anatta and Romance

Exploring Theravāda's connections to other paths - what can we learn from other traditions, religions and philosophies?
Post Reply
User avatar
Moth
Posts: 172
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 7:22 pm
Contact:

Anatta and Romance

Post by Moth »

I was just contemplating this and I thought I'd ask your opinion. To say that you love someone "for who they are" would always be incorrect as all beings are empty of a self. So in that sense all romance is based on clinging to external (selfless) phenomenon such as form, perception, or feeling that arise in dependence with contact (either with sight, scent, sound, touch, etc). Thus romantic love is a conditioned feeling, impermanent, subject to clinging, and dependent upon certain external stimuli--not on any particular individual person. Would it follow then that saying you love someone (romantically) is a false statement?
May you be happy. May you be a peace. May you be free from suffering.
http://www.everythingspirals.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
Wizard in the Forest
Posts: 699
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:16 am
Location: House in Forest of Illusions

Re: Anatta and Romance

Post by Wizard in the Forest »

If given that it's a conditional love, yes. But if you love them regardless of whether they're empty of a self or not then it's pure metta expressed in various ways. There's 2 kinds of love, there's attached conditional love, and unattached unconditional love. The latter is how most people ideally want their romantic relationships to be.
"One is not born a woman, but becomes one."- Simone de Beauvoir
User avatar
andre9999
Posts: 465
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 3:04 pm
Location: Milwaukee, WI, US
Contact:

Re: Anatta and Romance

Post by andre9999 »

Moth wrote:Would it follow then that saying you love someone (romantically) is a false statement?
Even if all that were true, that is still your understanding of this world unless you're awakened. I'd say the greater lie would be if you said that loving someone was false while you still cling to self.

Still, choose your battles. You tell someone that you can't love them because they cling to a concept of self, and that will probably be a short relationship.
Kenshou
Posts: 1030
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:03 am
Location: Minneapolis, MN

Re: Anatta and Romance

Post by Kenshou »

As far as I know romantic love doesn't necessarily exclude the possibility of being aware of people/the person as a non-atta process of conditionality.
User avatar
cooran
Posts: 8503
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 11:32 pm
Location: Queensland, Australia

Re: Anatta and Romance

Post by cooran »

We are aware intellectually of the difference between Conventional and Ultimate truths. But unless we've reached one of the levels of enlightenment, it is all just theory. Live your life where you actually are.

with metta
Chris
---The trouble is that you think you have time---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
User avatar
zavk
Posts: 1161
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:04 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Anatta and Romance

Post by zavk »

Hi moth

I'll let others more knowledgable clarify the dynamics of the doctrines involved in this issue. For me, when I was first getting established in the Dhamma I had to come to terms (quite painfully) with how I totally screwed up a relationship. I had to honestly ask myself, 'Do I really know what it means to love someone else? Have I really just been caught up in a sense of self and was actually expecting someone else to give me affirmation for this projected sense of self--and mistaking all of that for 'love''? Learning about the following helped a lot:


Raja Sutta: http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I have heard that on one occasion the Blessed One was staying near Savatthi, in Jeta's Grove, Anathapindika's monastery. Now at that time King Pasenadi Kosala was together with Queen Mallika in the upper palace. Then he said to her, "Is there anyone more dear to you than yourself?"

"No, your majesty," she answered. "There is no one more dear to me than myself. And what about you, your majesty? Is there anyone more dear to you than yourself?"

"No, Mallika. There is no one more dear to me than myself."

Then the king, descending from the palace, went to the Blessed One and, on arrival, having bowed down to him, sat to one side. As he was sitting there, he said to the Blessed One: "Just now I was together with Queen Mallika in the upper palace. I said to her, 'Is there anyone more dear to you than yourself?'

"'No, your majesty,' she answered. 'There is no one more dear to me than myself. And what about you, your majesty? Is there anyone more dear to you than yourself?'

"'No, Mallika. There is no one more dear to me than myself.'"

Then, on realizing the significance of that, the Blessed One on that occasion exclaimed:


Searching all directions
with one's awareness,
one finds no one dearer
than oneself.
In the same way, others
are fiercely dear to themselves.
So one should not hurt others
if one loves oneself.
I hope this is of relevance.

:anjali: :smile: :group:
With metta,
zavk
nobody12345
Posts: 196
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 4:05 am

Re: Anatta and Romance

Post by nobody12345 »

Moth, I agree whole heartily with your assessment of 'love'.
Also I believe all romance ends in tears, even the greatest ones.
When two people fall in love, two things will happen.
1. One of them will fall out of love.
2. One of them will die sooner or later.
All romance ends in misery/suffering.
Metta.
User avatar
ground
Posts: 2591
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 6:01 am

Re: Anatta and Romance

Post by ground »

Moth wrote:I was just contemplating this and I thought I'd ask your opinion. To say that you love someone "for who they are" would always be incorrect as all beings are empty of a self. So in that sense all romance is based on clinging to external (selfless) phenomenon such as form, perception, or feeling that arise in dependence with contact (either with sight, scent, sound, touch, etc). Thus romantic love is a conditioned feeling, impermanent, subject to clinging, and dependent upon certain external stimuli--not on any particular individual person.
I would say "You love someone (romantically) due to the love you feel based on the way they are appearing to you."

Moth wrote: Would it follow then that saying you love someone (romantically) is a false statement?
No, the statement is conventionally valid.

Kind regards
vesuyul
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 4:21 pm

Re: Anatta and Romance

Post by vesuyul »

That's why the wise of old and even now.....all go forth to the homeless life and practice meditation. There is no higher bliss than Nibbana.
If not, follow conventional reality and be your best in efforts to be a good husband, good wife, good child, good father, good mother etc etc.
In a relationship, there can be gain as well. Husband and wife can help each other in practice and collecting parami. It's not that we think it's anatta and poof its all false. We have to know it is false. And yes finally it's all false.
ravkes
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 3:00 am

Re: Anatta and Romance

Post by ravkes »

Moth wrote:I was just contemplating this and I thought I'd ask your opinion. To say that you love someone "for who they are" would always be incorrect as all beings are empty of a self. So in that sense all romance is based on clinging to external (selfless) phenomenon such as form, perception, or feeling that arise in dependence with contact (either with sight, scent, sound, touch, etc). Thus romantic love is a conditioned feeling, impermanent, subject to clinging, and dependent upon certain external stimuli--not on any particular individual person. Would it follow then that saying you love someone (romantically) is a false statement?
yes. however, when it is seen that all phenomena is empty of self the love he feels is deeper and no longer for only one person.. the expression of this love may be romantic.

:)
User avatar
Guy
Posts: 762
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 4:05 am
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Re: Anatta and Romance

Post by Guy »

imaginos wrote:When two people fall in love, two things will happen.
1. One of them will fall out of love.
2. One of them will die sooner or later.
All romance ends in misery/suffering.
Or 3. They both die and in their next lifetime they fall in love with each other all over again
Four types of letting go:

1) Giving; expecting nothing back in return
2) Throwing things away
3) Contentment; wanting to be here, not wanting to be anywhere else
4) "Teflon Mind"; having a mind which doesn't accumulate things

- Ajahn Brahm
User avatar
andre9999
Posts: 465
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 3:04 pm
Location: Milwaukee, WI, US
Contact:

Re: Anatta and Romance

Post by andre9999 »

Guy wrote:
imaginos wrote:When two people fall in love, two things will happen.
1. One of them will fall out of love.
2. One of them will die sooner or later.
All romance ends in misery/suffering.
Or 3. They both die and in their next lifetime they fall in love with each other all over again
So you mean my wedding vows meant we'd be together forever and not just this lifetime? My wife's gonna be pissed.
User avatar
Guy
Posts: 762
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 4:05 am
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Re: Anatta and Romance

Post by Guy »

andrer9999 wrote:
Guy wrote:
imaginos wrote:When two people fall in love, two things will happen.
1. One of them will fall out of love.
2. One of them will die sooner or later.
All romance ends in misery/suffering.
Or 3. They both die and in their next lifetime they fall in love with each other all over again
So you mean my wedding vows meant we'd be together forever and not just this lifetime? My wife's gonna be pissed.
Depends - are your wedding vows "forever" or "til death do us part"?
Four types of letting go:

1) Giving; expecting nothing back in return
2) Throwing things away
3) Contentment; wanting to be here, not wanting to be anywhere else
4) "Teflon Mind"; having a mind which doesn't accumulate things

- Ajahn Brahm
User avatar
andre9999
Posts: 465
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 3:04 pm
Location: Milwaukee, WI, US
Contact:

Re: Anatta and Romance

Post by andre9999 »

Guy wrote:Depends - are your wedding vows "forever" or "til death do us part"?
The latter, but it didn't specify which death.
Post Reply