Tribal law (common law) vs Civilized people law (civil law)

A place to bring a contemplative / Dharmic perspective and opinions to current events and politics.
User avatar
Posts: 6625
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
Location: Ellan Vannin

Re: Tribal law (common law) vs Civilized people law (civil law)

Post by Cittasanto » Fri Dec 22, 2017 11:48 am

The burden of proof is with the accuser, not the accused.
The accuser always has to provide the legal evidence to support their claim. Claiming it is inefficient and the system being inefficient at finding the truth aren't the same. Show your evidence. As a prosecutor in a common law system would have to.

Kind regards
Blog, Suttas, Aj Chah, Facebook.

He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them.
But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion …
He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.
John Stuart Mill


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests