Avijja translated as "Insentience"

A discussion on all aspects of Theravāda Buddhism
Garrib
Posts: 473
Joined: Mon May 30, 2016 8:35 pm

Avijja translated as "Insentience"

Post by Garrib » Tue Aug 22, 2017 2:13 am

Bhante Punnaji speaks in this video ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOtP4S4nm_k ) about his translation of avijja as "insentience" rather than "ignorance" (although he does say that ignorance makes sense in so far as it means "not knowing the Four Noble Truths"). I tried to make sense of this, thought I was getting somewhere for a minute, and then realized I didn't really understand what he was getting at.

Can anyone help me understand the meaning of this? - do you think this is a valid interpretation?

Thank you!

Brad

User avatar
pilgrim
Posts: 1524
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:56 pm

Re: Avijja translated as "Insentience"

Post by pilgrim » Tue Aug 22, 2017 4:41 am

Insentience would commonly mean being Unconscious or without Consciousness which would not make sense in the context of Buddhism. But it is quite common for Bhante to come out with new and quirky interpretations for common Buddhist terms.

Garrib
Posts: 473
Joined: Mon May 30, 2016 8:35 pm

Re: Avijja translated as "Insentience"

Post by Garrib » Tue Aug 22, 2017 4:53 am

pilgrim wrote:Insentience would commonly mean being Unconscious or without Consciousness which would not make sense in the context of Buddhism. But it is quite common for Bhante to come out with new and quirky interpretations for common Buddhist terms.
Thanks for the response Pilgrim,

I basically understand what the word means, in normal usage. What I am trying to figure out is in what way dependent origination makes sense if you think of the first link as "insentience." I saw a thread about this at sutta central - there were only a couple of replies, and no one seemed to really offer a satisfactory answer. I'm hoping someone can help to make sense of this.

User avatar
DooDoot
Posts: 2507
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2017 11:06 pm

Re: Avijja translated as "Insentience"

Post by DooDoot » Tue Aug 22, 2017 5:25 am

The speaker is simply translating 'avijja' as 'insentience' or 'unconsciousness' rather than 'ignorance'. This novel translation does not change anything because being unconscious of the four noble truths is the same as being ignorant of the four noble truths, as follows:
Katamā ca, bhikkhave, avijjā? Yaṃ kho, bhikkhave, dukkhe aññāṇaṃ, dukkhasamudaye aññāṇaṃ, dukkhanirodhe aññāṇaṃ, duk­kha­nirodha­gāminiyā paṭipadāya aññāṇaṃ. Ayaṃ vuccati, bhikkhave, avijjā.

And what, bhikkhus, is insentience? Not knowing suffering, not knowing the origin of suffering, not knowing the cessation of suffering, not knowing the way leading to the cessation of suffering. This is called insentience.
Last edited by DooDoot on Wed Aug 23, 2017 5:14 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
SDC
Posts: 4395
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 11:08 pm

Re: Avijja translated as "Insentience"

Post by SDC » Tue Aug 22, 2017 4:29 pm

Bhante P's interpretations are heavily influenced by western psychology, so it would make sense that he would associate avija with "the unconscious" in the spirit of Freud's use of the term.

User avatar
CedarTree
Posts: 254
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2017 9:37 pm

Re: Avijja translated as "Insentience"

Post by CedarTree » Tue Aug 22, 2017 10:21 pm

SDC wrote:Bhante P's interpretations are heavily influenced by western psychology, so it would make sense that he would associate avija with "the unconscious" in the spirit of Freud's use of the term.
That's a good tidbit to know, thanks :)


Practice, Practice, Practice


User avatar
SDC
Posts: 4395
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 11:08 pm

Re: Avijja translated as "Insentience"

Post by SDC » Tue Aug 22, 2017 11:35 pm

CedarTree wrote:
SDC wrote:Bhante P's interpretations are heavily influenced by western psychology, so it would make sense that he would associate avija with "the unconscious" in the spirit of Freud's use of the term.
That's a good tidbit to know, thanks :)
You're welcome, CT.

He is truly a remarkable monk, and despite drifting from his ideas in recent years, I had many rewarding years studying his work.

Garrib
Posts: 473
Joined: Mon May 30, 2016 8:35 pm

Re: Avijja translated as "Insentience"

Post by Garrib » Wed Aug 23, 2017 12:24 am

Thanks SDC,

Can you perhaps elaborate on what you've said? You think that Bhante P is equating the first link of DO with Freud's idea of the unconscious?

User avatar
CedarTree
Posts: 254
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2017 9:37 pm

Re: Avijja translated as "Insentience"

Post by CedarTree » Wed Aug 23, 2017 12:38 am

SDC wrote:
CedarTree wrote:
SDC wrote:Bhante P's interpretations are heavily influenced by western psychology, so it would make sense that he would associate avija with "the unconscious" in the spirit of Freud's use of the term.
That's a good tidbit to know, thanks :)
You're welcome, CT.

He is truly a remarkable monk, and despite drifting from his ideas in recent years, I had many rewarding years studying his work.
Your the best what can I say.

But now I am curious on the whole "drifting from his ideas" point you raised.


Practice, Practice, Practice


User avatar
SDC
Posts: 4395
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 11:08 pm

Re: Avijja translated as "Insentience"

Post by SDC » Wed Aug 23, 2017 5:49 pm

Garrib wrote:Thanks SDC,

Can you perhaps elaborate on what you've said? You think that Bhante P is equating the first link of DO with Freud's idea of the unconscious?
Hi Garrib,

I have no reason to assume otherwise. While he does touch on aspects of atemporality à la Nanavira on the back six links of DO, his approach is primarily a psychological process model. Avija paccaya sankhara he described as, "From a state of complete unconsciousness, the mental process begins". Taking into account his reference to the Dhamma as psychotherapy, I think he is comfortable with, in the very least, allowing the puthujjana's ignorance (and suffering) to be equated with Freud's model of the human mind. (When dealing with the sottapana and beyond, I think he is more inclined to abandon it). I can't say for sure if there have been further developments in his views over the last fours years, since I am out of touch with his recent work, but that was the deal when I was involved.

User avatar
SDC
Posts: 4395
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 11:08 pm

Re: Avijja translated as "Insentience"

Post by SDC » Wed Aug 23, 2017 5:56 pm

CedarTree wrote: But now I am curious on the whole "drifting from his ideas" point you raised.
Have you ever seen the movie "Cast Away"? When Wilson fell out of the boat? It was sort of like that... :tongue:

I had many nagging questions that I was not ready to set aside, so I strayed...

User avatar
CedarTree
Posts: 254
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2017 9:37 pm

Re: Avijja translated as "Insentience"

Post by CedarTree » Wed Aug 23, 2017 6:36 pm

SDC wrote:
CedarTree wrote: But now I am curious on the whole "drifting from his ideas" point you raised.
Have you ever seen the movie "Cast Away"? When Wilson fell out of the boat? It was sort of like that... :tongue:

I had many nagging questions that I was not ready to set aside, so I strayed...
You can not leave me in the dark like this! I can imagine I am not the only one very curious right now.

Details SDC! :meditate:


Practice, Practice, Practice


User avatar
aflatun
Posts: 814
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2016 2:40 pm
Location: Bay Area, CA

Re: Avijja translated as "Insentience"

Post by aflatun » Wed Aug 23, 2017 6:56 pm

SDC wrote:
CedarTree wrote: But now I am curious on the whole "drifting from his ideas" point you raised.
Have you ever seen the movie "Cast Away"? When Wilson fell out of the boat? It was sort of like that... :tongue:

I had many nagging questions that I was not ready to set aside, so I strayed...
Lol That scene was epic!!! WILSON!

https://youtu.be/W7FLsIidvE8
"People often get too quick to say 'there's no self. There's no self...no self...no self.' There is self, there is focal point, its not yours. That's what not self is."

Ninoslav Ñāṇamoli
Senses and the Thought-1, 42:53

"Those who create constructs about the Buddha,
Who is beyond construction and without exhaustion,
Are thereby damaged by their constructs;
They fail to see the Thus-Gone.

That which is the nature of the Thus-Gone
Is also the nature of this world.
There is no nature of the Thus-Gone.
There is no nature of the world."

Nagarjuna
MMK XXII.15-16

User avatar
DooDoot
Posts: 2507
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2017 11:06 pm

Re: Avijja translated as "Insentience"

Post by DooDoot » Wed Aug 23, 2017 9:16 pm

SDC wrote:Avija paccaya sankhara he described as, "From a state of complete unconsciousness, the mental process begins".
He did not say this in the video but seemed to infer this. If he has actually said this elsewhere then how can 'unconsciousness' fit into the text below?
Bhikkhus, dependent on the eye and forms, eye-consciousness arises; the meeting of the three is contact; with contact as condition there arises a feeling felt as... neither-painful-nor-pleasant.... When one is touched by a neither-painful-nor-pleasant feeling, if one does not understand as it actually is the origination, the disappearance, the gratification, the danger, and the escape in regard to that feeling, then the underlying tendency to ignorance lies within one (avijjānusayo anuseti). MN 148
Or this?
There are three taints: the taint of sensual desire, the taint of being and the taint of ignorance. With the arising of ignorance there is the arising of the taints. With the cessation of ignorance there is the cessation of the taints. ... With the arising of the taints there is the arising of ignorance. With the cessation of the taints there is the cessation of ignorance. MN 9
Or this?
On seeing a form with the eye, he lusts after it if it is pleasing; he dislikes it if it is unpleasing. He abides with mindfulness of the body unestablished, with a limited mind, and he does not understand as it actually is the deliverance of mind and deliverance by wisdom wherein those evil unwholesome states cease without remainder. MN 38

User avatar
SDC
Posts: 4395
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 11:08 pm

Re: Avijja translated as "Insentience"

Post by SDC » Wed Aug 23, 2017 9:29 pm

DooDoot wrote:
SDC wrote:Avija paccaya sankhara he described as, "From a state of complete unconsciousness, the mental process begins".
He did not say this in the video but seemed to infer this. If he has actually said this elsewhere then how can 'unconsciousness' fit into the text below?
What video? I was speaking about what I've heard him say in the past and was clear that I have been away from anything he has done for about the last four years. If you are looking for me to act as a representative of his work so you can do your thing to it, I have to disappoint you.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: denise and 67 guests