Does illegal downloading violate the 2nd precept?

Buddhist ethical conduct including the Five Precepts (Pañcasikkhāpada), and Eightfold Ethical Conduct (Aṭṭhasīla).
Janalanda
Posts: 128
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2016 7:29 pm

Re: Does illegal downloading violate the 2nd precept?

Post by Janalanda » Mon Aug 29, 2016 12:05 am

Buddha said "kamma is intention". Even normal humans realized this. For example: you don't go to jail for killing somebody by mistake. If it wasn't your intention, no need to feel too bad about it.
"'Kamma should be known. The cause by which kamma comes into play should be known. The diversity in kamma should be known. The result of kamma should be known. The cessation of kamma should be known. The path of practice for the cessation of kamma should be known.' Thus it has been said. In reference to what was it said?

"Intention, I tell you, is kamma. Intending, one does kamma by way of body, speech, & intellect.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/ptf/dham ... kamma.html

User avatar
samseva
Posts: 2131
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 12:59 pm

Re: Does illegal downloading violate the 2nd precept?

Post by samseva » Mon Aug 29, 2016 12:22 am

spacenick wrote:So first of all, this comes from the commentaries. I take the 5 precepts from the Canon as being this:
1. Panatipata veramani sikkhapadam samadiyami
I undertake the precept to refrain from destroying living creatures.
2. Adinnadana veramani sikkhapadam samadiyami
I undertake the precept to refrain from taking that which is not given.
3. Kamesu micchacara veramani sikkhapadam samadiyami
I undertake the precept to refrain from sexual misconduct.
4. Musavada veramani sikkhapadam samadiyami
I undertake the precept to refrain from incorrect speech.
5. Suramerayamajja pamadatthana veramani sikkhapadam samadiyami
I undertake the precept to refrain from intoxicating drinks and drugs which lead to carelessness.
As you can see, no intention is mentioned here.
We would have barely any understanding at all of many parts of the Canon if it weren't for the Commentaries. Furthermore, the absence of the word 'intention' in only the formulation of the precepts—not the explanations—is an incorrect argument regarding intention not being part of the precepts.
spacenick wrote:But anyway, I mentioned intention in the sense of: it is not the having the intention to harm that...

[...]

[^1]: And it's helpful to try to escape our Judeo-Christian conditioning as much as we can and to remember that these training rules...
Obviously, intention of each precept alone aren't the precepts themselves; it is one factor among others—and most or all the factors must be fulfilled for the breach of a precept. Also, the association with Judeo-Christian beliefs and behaviours is not something everyone shares and is very much dependent on one's personal conditioning.

Intention is part of the precepts. I am sure there are many Sutta passages describing this. If the above excerpts from Bhikkhu Bodhi's work aren't sufficient, then please feel free to search for Sutta passages that support either point of view that intention is or isn't part of the precepts (you will probably find some for the former and none for the latter).

Regards.

spacenick
Posts: 103
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2016 7:31 pm

Re: Does illegal downloading violate the 2nd precept?

Post by spacenick » Mon Aug 29, 2016 12:28 am

I guess we will agree to disagree.

:anjali:

User avatar
Chula
Posts: 172
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 5:58 am
Location: Sri Lanka

Re: Does illegal downloading violate the 2nd precept?

Post by Chula » Mon Aug 29, 2016 5:42 pm

I recently found a detailed response on this from Bhante Yuttadhammo that I think does a very good job:

http://buddhism.stackexchange.com/quest ... /2869#2869

I think I generally agree with that perspective.

User avatar
Bhikkhu Pesala
Posts: 3745
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Does illegal downloading violate the 2nd precept?

Post by Bhikkhu Pesala » Mon Aug 29, 2016 8:47 pm

A monk can be guilty of defeat without taking any physical object.
Buddhist Monastic Discipline wrote:d. Smuggling: A bhikkhu carrying items subject to an import duty hides them as he goes through customs. The taking is accomplished when the item leaves the customs area.
The law of the land decided that duty is payable on certain goods. Failing to pay that duty is theft.

The law of the land decides that payment is due on downloaded films, music, or software. What is the difference here if one fails to make the legally required payment?

Similarly, what about evasion of payment when travelling by train? One could argue that there is a negligible cost to the train company in carrying another 100 Kg when the fully loaded train weighs thousands of Kg. However, that's not the point. The law requires payment to be made.
Buddhist Monastic Discipline wrote:Special cases cited in the Commentary include the following:
a. False dealing: A bhikkhu makes counterfeit money or uses counterfeit weights. The taking is accomplished when the counterfeit is accepted.
b. Extortion: Using threats, a bhikkhu compels the owner of an object to give it to him. The taking is accomplished when the owner complies.
BlogPāli FontsIn This Very LifeBuddhist ChroniclesSoftware (Upasampadā: 24th June, 1979)

User avatar
Dhammarakkhito
Posts: 1115
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:31 am
Contact:

Re: Does illegal downloading violate the 2nd precept?

Post by Dhammarakkhito » Sun Oct 22, 2017 2:02 am

does there not have to be a physical object? you can't take information, only see it
"Just as the ocean has a single taste — that of salt — in the same way, this Dhamma-Vinaya has a single taste: that of release."
— Ud 5.5

https://www.facebook.com/noblebuddhadha ... 34/?type=3

http://seeingthroughthenet.net/
https://sites.google.com/site/santipada ... allytaught

User avatar
Dhammarakkhito
Posts: 1115
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:31 am
Contact:

Re: Does illegal downloading violate the 2nd precept?

Post by Dhammarakkhito » Sun Oct 22, 2017 2:06 am

see it, hear it, etc., i mean. i'm surprised to see a lot of people here describing kamma as a positive obligation (rather than a negative one); to me, it is something you don't do.
"Just as the ocean has a single taste — that of salt — in the same way, this Dhamma-Vinaya has a single taste: that of release."
— Ud 5.5

https://www.facebook.com/noblebuddhadha ... 34/?type=3

http://seeingthroughthenet.net/
https://sites.google.com/site/santipada ... allytaught

User avatar
cappuccino
Posts: 1562
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 1:45 am

Re: Does illegal downloading violate the 2nd precept?

Post by cappuccino » Sun Oct 22, 2017 2:58 am

Stealing — when indulged in, developed, & pursued — is something that leads to hell, leads to rebirth as a common animal, leads to the realm of the hungry shades. The slightest of all the results coming from stealing is that, when one becomes a human being, it leads to the loss of one's wealth.

User avatar
cappuccino
Posts: 1562
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 1:45 am

Re: Does illegal downloading violate the 2nd precept?

Post by cappuccino » Sun Oct 22, 2017 3:00 am

when indulged in, developed, & pursued

User avatar
Dhammarakkhito
Posts: 1115
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:31 am
Contact:

Re: Does illegal downloading violate the 2nd precept?

Post by Dhammarakkhito » Sun Oct 22, 2017 3:32 am

forcibly liberating a slave in the united states would have been considered theft, but it would have been a very kind thing to do
"Just as the ocean has a single taste — that of salt — in the same way, this Dhamma-Vinaya has a single taste: that of release."
— Ud 5.5

https://www.facebook.com/noblebuddhadha ... 34/?type=3

http://seeingthroughthenet.net/
https://sites.google.com/site/santipada ... allytaught

User avatar
Kim OHara
Posts: 4999
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 5:47 am
Location: North Queensland, Australia

Re: Does illegal downloading violate the 2nd precept?

Post by Kim OHara » Mon Oct 23, 2017 5:47 am

Sovatthika wrote:
Sun Oct 22, 2017 3:32 am
forcibly liberating a slave in the united states would have been considered theft, but it would have been a very kind thing to do
(1) That's a very long way from copying a movie. :jawdrop:
(2) Most of the things we do carry some mixture of kamma and we need to assess the balance. In that case, the good of freeing the slave would (IMO) more than outweigh the bad of stealing.

:coffee:
Kim

User avatar
Kim OHara
Posts: 4999
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 5:47 am
Location: North Queensland, Australia

Re: Does illegal downloading violate the 2nd precept?

Post by Kim OHara » Mon Oct 23, 2017 5:50 am

Sovatthika wrote:
Sun Oct 22, 2017 2:06 am
see it, hear it, etc., i mean. i'm surprised to see a lot of people here describing kamma as a positive obligation (rather than a negative one); to me, it is something you don't do.
It's not an action, it's a consequence.
There's no 'obligation', any more than there's an 'obligation' to abide by the Law of Gravity.

:coffee:
Kim

User avatar
Dhammarakkhito
Posts: 1115
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:31 am
Contact:

Re: Does illegal downloading violate the 2nd precept?

Post by Dhammarakkhito » Mon Nov 06, 2017 5:09 am

yeah those points i made might have been irrelevant

but yeah the owner hasn't been deprived of their content (movie, song, book, etc.); violating the law and stealing (taking what has not been given) is not the same thing.
they might not be getting as much money (some content is released free and indirectly the company gains thru free advertising) but they still have their work. you run into absurdity trying to hold up this ethic. is taking a picture of a piece of bread taking the bread? no. 'do you need to download...' irrelevant
when you start with a bad interpretation of a precept and hold up unnecessary standards you make it harder to follow the precepts
"Just as the ocean has a single taste — that of salt — in the same way, this Dhamma-Vinaya has a single taste: that of release."
— Ud 5.5

https://www.facebook.com/noblebuddhadha ... 34/?type=3

http://seeingthroughthenet.net/
https://sites.google.com/site/santipada ... allytaught

User avatar
Dhammarakkhito
Posts: 1115
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:31 am
Contact:

Re: Does illegal downloading violate the 2nd precept?

Post by Dhammarakkhito » Mon Nov 06, 2017 5:22 am

analyze what is being taken. can you take data?
"Just as the ocean has a single taste — that of salt — in the same way, this Dhamma-Vinaya has a single taste: that of release."
— Ud 5.5

https://www.facebook.com/noblebuddhadha ... 34/?type=3

http://seeingthroughthenet.net/
https://sites.google.com/site/santipada ... allytaught

User avatar
Kim OHara
Posts: 4999
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 5:47 am
Location: North Queensland, Australia

Re: Does illegal downloading violate the 2nd precept?

Post by Kim OHara » Mon Nov 06, 2017 5:55 am

Sovatthika wrote:
Mon Nov 06, 2017 5:09 am
... when you start with a bad interpretation of a precept and hold up unnecessary standards you make it harder to follow the precepts
When you try to distort the plain intention of the precept to suit your own desires, you are demonstrating that you don't want to follow the precept.

:thinking:
Kim

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests