Is this considered a breach of the third precept?

Buddhist ethical conduct including the Five Precepts (Pañcasikkhāpada), and Eightfold Ethical Conduct (Aṭṭhasīla).
User avatar
Posts: 2529
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:04 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Is this considered a breach of the third precept?

Post by manas » Thu Feb 08, 2018 11:59 pm

lyndon taylor wrote:
Thu Feb 01, 2018 5:42 am
If you think the third precept gives you the right to visit prostitutes, I think you're missing the point of sexual misconduct IMHO.
I don't think I could enjoy having sex with a prostitute (who often despise their clients, how could that be fun?) but still, it would be more honourable to do that, than to feign affection for a woman, just to get sex from her, as I believe happens quite often. At least with the sex worker, there is no deception involved either way.
From what's dear is born grief,
from what's dear is born fear.
For one freed from what's dear
there's no grief
— so how fear?

Dhp 212

Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2017 8:24 am

Re: Is this considered a breach of the third precept?

Post by KiwiNFLFan » Thu Jun 21, 2018 12:29 am

To get this thread back on track...

What does "being under the protection of one's parents" mean in the modern age, particularly where the trend is for both men and women to move out as soon as they turn 18/leave school? Is a 19 year old woman living by herself and working considered "under the protection of her parents" simply because she's not married? If so, this sounds like we're heading down the road to Christian patriarchy...

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests