Arguing about Mahasi Sayadaw and Goenka Meditation

General discussion of issues related to Theravada Meditation, e.g. meditation postures, developing a regular sitting practice, skillfully relating to difficulties and hindrances, etc.
budo
Posts: 1752
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 12:16 am

Re: Arguing about Mahasi Sayadaw and Goenka Meditation

Post by budo »

Interesting that people who are responding to this thread are being so dismissive rather than using it as a opportunity to learn something new. Have they attained nibbana already?


SarathW, can you please explain the difference between the two different types of Sati?

Thank you.
Bijlefeld
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2017 10:20 pm

Re: Arguing about Mahasi Sayadaw and Goenka Meditation

Post by Bijlefeld »

Just finished watching the video, am I summing it up correctly in that he’s stating that the Mahasi-style noting is just attention, not mindfulness, and that one must examine thoughts, speech, action to see if there are any ignorance, greed, ill-will motivating those. That the more focused attention and decision to perform the speech or action, assuming it has no mitigating factors, without expecting results, is proper sati. And that proper sati and pañña can guard the mind from further defilements and give a chance to realize nibbana?
Those seem to make sense, just wanted to see if there are key points I missed or if I’m off the mark, as my memory isn’t always great.
‘etaṃ santaṃ etaṃ paṇītaṃ yadidaṃ sabba­saṅ­khā­ra­sama­tho sabbū­padhipa­ṭi­nissaggo taṇhākkhayo virāgo nirodho nibbānan’
User1249x
Posts: 2749
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 8:50 pm

Re: Arguing about Mahasi Sayadaw and Goenka Meditation

Post by User1249x »

Wouldn't noting constitute applied thought?
budo
Posts: 1752
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 12:16 am

Re: Arguing about Mahasi Sayadaw and Goenka Meditation

Post by budo »

Bijlefeld wrote: Fri Apr 20, 2018 5:18 am Just finished watching the video, am I summing it up correctly in that he’s stating that the Mahasi-style noting is just attention, not mindfulness, and that one must examine thoughts, speech, action to see if there are any ignorance, greed, ill-will motivating those. That the more focused attention and decision to perform the speech or action, assuming it has no mitigating factors, without expecting results, is proper sati. And that proper sati and pañña can guard the mind from further defilements and give a chance to realize nibbana?
Those seem to make sense, just wanted to see if there are key points I missed or if I’m off the mark, as my memory isn’t always great.
I think Henepola Gunaratana has the same view, he thinks Sati is not something as simple as noting. You can see him talk about it in this video clip

So Ven. Pemasiri (Video in the op) also seems to come from the Vipassana camp as well, since in his videos he's saying that he's too old for Jhana meditation and he did that when he was younger. So how does he practice "Vipassana" then? Just momentary concentration and not focusing on one object but instead whatever object arises in his attention? I'm still unclear what his method is.
User avatar
mikenz66
Posts: 19948
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:37 am
Location: Aotearoa, New Zealand

Re: Arguing about Mahasi Sayadaw and Goenka Meditation

Post by mikenz66 »

budo wrote: Fri Apr 20, 2018 5:11 pm I think Henepola Gunaratana has the same view, he thinks Sati is not something as simple as noting.
Of course not. Noting is just a minor aspect of the Mahasi approach, used as an aid to developing attention so that one can do the sort of things that Bhante Gunaratana describes.

Most of that video seems to be a criticism of the secular mindfulness approach of dissociating mindfulness from Dhamma.

:heart:
Mike
Post Reply