Megalomania and Buddhism
Megalomania and Buddhism
Are the mega Buddha statues contrary to the very spirit of Buddhism: the spirit of middleness and measure?
Re: Megalomania and Buddhism
Surely if you calculated the statistical average size of Buddha statues, based on measuring all Buddha statues in existence, from those that are about 1 cm or less tall, to those that measure in tens of meters, you'd get a nice middle measure.
Hic Rhodus, hic salta!
Re: Megalomania and Buddhism
If I recall correctly, the Buddha had asked for no statues or images and this was followed for some centuries after his passing. But then people being people, they started making them. There are pros and cons - art can inspire and motivate people to practice.
_/|\_
Re: Megalomania and Buddhism
Could there be pros and cons if the Buddha had asked for no statues or images. (Cognitive dissonance)
Re: Megalomania and Buddhism
Whether his wish was that no statues or images are build by his immediate disciples, who should rather concentrate on other things, or built ever, I am not sure. Nor that the Buddha always knew the best possible course of action for eternity.
_/|\_
Re: Megalomania and Buddhism
Could someone please provide an actual canonical reference for the claim that "the Buddha had asked for no statues or images"?
Hic Rhodus, hic salta!
Re: Megalomania and Buddhism
It's a disputed matter. Ven Dhammanando gave once some explanations, see the following topic: viewtopic.php?f=19&t=32666#p485172.
Re: Megalomania and Buddhism
I don't think there was much of a tradition of statuary in the Buddha's time. There is no proscription because it was not thought of.
As such, the "mega statues" can be seen as merely tasteful or distasteful. The important thing is one's attitude towards them. I have known Western monks explain how their refined sensibilities were offended by the garish and intrusive Buddha-rupas they encountered in Thailand and Burma. They grew to appreciate them, though.
As such, the "mega statues" can be seen as merely tasteful or distasteful. The important thing is one's attitude towards them. I have known Western monks explain how their refined sensibilities were offended by the garish and intrusive Buddha-rupas they encountered in Thailand and Burma. They grew to appreciate them, though.
- confusedlayman
- Posts: 6258
- Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2019 12:16 am
- Location: Human Realm (as of now)
Re: Megalomania and Buddhism
People who delight in statue are addicted to appearance and come under mara
I may be slow learner but im at least learning...
Re: Megalomania and Buddhism
It looks like a cargo cult.
- retrofuturist
- Posts: 27860
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Megalomania and Buddhism
Greetings,
I tend to find the grandiosity of the Dhammakaya sect to be disconnected from the true nature of the Dhamma.
Metta,
Paul.
I tend to find the grandiosity of the Dhammakaya sect to be disconnected from the true nature of the Dhamma.
Metta,
Paul.
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
Re: Megalomania and Buddhism
Large statues are everywhere, not necessarily anything to do with Dhammakaya. Like any construction, they can be inspiring, or irritating, depending on your preferences.retrofuturist wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2020 2:03 am Greetings,
I tend to find the grandiosity of the Dhammakaya sect to be disconnected from the true nature of the Dhamma.
Metta,
Paul.
These are a couple I've visited a few times...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Buddha_of_Thailand
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tian_Tan_Buddha
The Tian Tan Buddha in Hong Kong has a particularly inspiring setting, and it faces North, towards China...
There is also a large installation featuring the Heart Sutra nearby: https://www.tourism.gov.hk/wisdompath/en/index.html
Mike