The original manuscript of Tipitak does not exist?

Organisational work, teaching, Sunday school syllabus, charitable work, outreach, sharing of resources, artwork, etc.
Post Reply
SarathW
Posts: 12467
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:49 am

The original manuscript of Tipitak does not exist?

Post by SarathW » Thu Jun 13, 2019 5:11 am

The original manuscript of Tipitak does not exist?

The original text copied 2,000 years has long vanished in the mists of history. Manuscripts in Sri Lanka generally do not last longer than a few hundred years, and presumably it would have been re-copied multiple times. The Alu Vihara, it seems, remained a center for preserving manuscripts. Sadly, though, the old library was destroyed, along with any manuscripts, during the Matale rebellion of 1848 4. So we shall never know exactly what was in it at that time...........

https://discourse.suttacentral.net/t/th ... xist/13026

What is your opinion?
“As the lamp consumes oil, the path realises Nibbana”

User avatar
retrofuturist
Site Admin
Posts: 21720
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: The original manuscript of Tipitak does not exist?

Post by retrofuturist » Thu Jun 13, 2019 5:16 am

Greetings,
SarathW wrote:
Thu Jun 13, 2019 5:11 am
What is your opinion?
If my understanding is correct, by that time, the Tipitaka had already been transcribed in other scripts (Burmese? Thai? Others?) with negligible disparity. Occasionally there are variances, as you'll have encountered if you read through Bhikkhu Bodhi's translations of one of the nikayas. From memory, I think he uses square brackets to demarcate variant readings, but they are so minimal as to be inconsequential in the scheme of things. Frankly, we're blessed that they survived to the 21st century, at all.

Metta,
Paul. :)
"The uprooting of identity is seen by the noble ones as pleasurable; but this contradicts what the whole world sees." (Snp 3.12)

"It is natural that one who knows and sees things as they really are is disenchanted and dispassionate." (AN 10.2)

“Truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it.” (Flannery O'Connor)

SarathW
Posts: 12467
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:49 am

Re: The original manuscript of Tipitak does not exist?

Post by SarathW » Thu Jun 13, 2019 5:21 am

we're blessed that they survived to the 21st century, at all.
Agree.
But the argument is that the Tipitaka in Sri Lanka is not a copy of the original pass down from Sri Lankan monks but was imported from Thailand.

From OP reference.


"We do know, however, that the Sri Lankan Sangha requested that manuscripts be imported from Myanmar and Thailand during the colonial period, due to the widespread destruction of the local manuscripts and difficulty of sponsoring new copies. Obviously this request would not have been made if complete and pristine ancient copies existed at a well-known temple like the Alu Vihara."
“As the lamp consumes oil, the path realises Nibbana”

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests