Monbiot on surgery and side-effects

A place to discuss health and fitness, healthy diets. A fit body makes for a fit mind.
Post Reply
User avatar
Kim OHara
Posts: 4999
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 5:47 am
Location: North Queensland, Australia

Monbiot on surgery and side-effects

Post by Kim OHara » Thu May 10, 2018 4:55 am

George Monbiot, regular Guardian columnist, has "found the key to a good life" through his cancer and says, "Prostate cancer surgery is no fun. But in two months I’ve learned more about myself and the world than in the previous two decades."
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... -good-life
... You can make resolutions that seem plausible – until they are fully tested. In the article I wrote two months ago, before my surgery, I mentioned the three principles that, I felt, were essential to happiness: imagine how much worse it could be, rather than how much better; change what you can change, accept what you can’t; and do not let fear rule your life. ...
So did they work, or did I abandon them and freak out?
I felt not only that those three principles had been vindicated, but that they could be assimilated into a broader rule, namely: the state of being for which we should strive is to be attached to life without being possessive of it. We should seek to love our lives and live fully, but not to extend them indefinitely. ...
while attachment seems vital – in both senses of this word – liberating myself from the urge to possess has proved an astonishing antidote to fear and tension.
:coffee:
Kim

User avatar
Sam Vara
Posts: 4407
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 5:42 pm
Location: Sussex, U.K.

Re: Monbiot on surgery and side-effects

Post by Sam Vara » Thu May 10, 2018 6:31 am

He also says:
The doctrines informing us that virtue and purity, or the states of jnana or sunyata, can be achieved, in some interpretations, by detachment from the physical senses and the material world hold little appeal for me, whether classical, Christian, Hindu or Buddhist. A large body of literature suggests that wellbeing is intimately linked to attachment – not only to other people, but also to the natural world.
It makes me wonder what meaning he attaches to the terms "attachment" and "possessiveness", and how these would map onto Buddhist terminology. I tend to think that "possession" is a complete impossibility, whereas "attachment" is all too real and can generate delusions of possessing something.

In any case, I'm glad he seems to be doing well and has a strategy for dealing with his problems which is effective.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests