Chanh Dao wrote: ↑Tue Jan 15, 2019 10:36 am
Most backpackers follow zero precepts. Monks follow 227.
Sure the number 227 is impressive, but a person, lay or ordained can keep 2 percepts i.e do what is wholesome and not do what is unwholesome, which covers it all.
There are many rules a part of the 227 that are irrelevant, not the spirit of the rule but the content, for example the rules on having felt rugs etc
A monastic sitting in an empty dwelling can keep all the rules, and a lay person can also just sit in an empty dwelling, simply not doing anything unwholesome. A backpacker can also just wander wholesomely, for not all who wander are lost.
I can understand keeping restraint is an ascetic practice but I just don't see why wandering around is 'ascetic'?
Surely, even wandering around could be done within the bounds of percepts, but still it could be an unwholesome act i.e a form of distraction, a restless mind, not wanting to be with others, or wanting to be with others, trying to prove something etc
Do you think wandering practice is inherently wholesome? Can it do the work of 'freedom from dukkha' for you?