Buddha's skin colour

Textual analysis and comparative discussion on early Buddhist sects and texts.
User avatar
Dhammanando
Posts: 4028
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:44 pm
Location: Ban Sri Pradu Cremation Ground, Phrao District, Chiangmai

Re: Buddha's skin colour

Post by Dhammanando » Sun Dec 03, 2017 5:38 am

thomaslaw wrote:
Sun Dec 03, 2017 1:56 am
The text does not state the 32 marks of the mahapurisa. It says the mahapurisa with great wisdom.
I know. It is nonetheless relevant as a response to the claim that the Buddha doesn't describe himself as a mahāpurisa.

thomaslaw
Posts: 152
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:55 am
Location: Australia

Re: Buddha's skin colour

Post by thomaslaw » Sun Dec 03, 2017 9:38 am

:twothumbsup:
Dhammanando wrote:
Sun Dec 03, 2017 5:38 am
thomaslaw wrote:
Sun Dec 03, 2017 1:56 am
The text does not state the 32 marks of the mahapurisa. It says the mahapurisa with great wisdom.
I know. It is nonetheless relevant as a response to the claim that the Buddha doesn't describe himself as a mahāpurisa.
Great wisdom of mahapurisa and the 32 marks of mahapurisa are certainly not the same mahapurisa. The Buddha does not in the text describe himself as the mahapurisa with 32 marks.

User avatar
Dhammanando
Posts: 4028
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:44 pm
Location: Ban Sri Pradu Cremation Ground, Phrao District, Chiangmai

Re: Buddha's skin colour

Post by Dhammanando » Sun Dec 03, 2017 9:37 pm

thomaslaw wrote:
Sun Dec 03, 2017 9:38 am
Great wisdom of mahapurisa and the 32 marks of mahapurisa are certainly not the same mahapurisa.
They certainly are, for in the Vassakārasutta the first of the four features of a great man of great wisdom includes the words, "... is one who has established the manyfolk in the ariyan method" (bahussa janatā ariye ñāye patiṭṭhāpitā). This is a descriptor that is only ever applied to Sammāsambuddhas.

That being so, the only difference between mahāpurisa in the Vassakārasutta and mahāpurisa in (some of) the thirty-two marks contexts is that in the former it it is a term for Sammāsambuddhas alone, while in the latter it may denote either Sammāsambuddhas or Wheel-turning Monarchs.

thomaslaw
Posts: 152
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:55 am
Location: Australia

Re: Buddha's skin colour

Post by thomaslaw » Mon Dec 04, 2017 6:59 am

Dhammanando wrote:
Sun Dec 03, 2017 9:37 pm
thomaslaw wrote:
Sun Dec 03, 2017 9:38 am
Great wisdom of mahapurisa and the 32 marks of mahapurisa are certainly not the same mahapurisa.
They certainly are, for in the Vassakārasutta the first of the four features of a great man of great wisdom includes the words, "... is one who has established the manyfolk in the ariyan method" (bahussa janatā ariye ñāye patiṭṭhāpitā). This is a descriptor that is only ever applied to Sammāsambuddhas.

That being so, the only difference between mahāpurisa in the Vassakārasutta and mahāpurisa in (some of) the thirty-two marks contexts is that in the former it it is a term for Sammāsambuddhas alone, while in the latter it may denote either Sammāsambuddhas or Wheel-turning Monarchs.
Another difference is: in the latter the Buddha does not say he is the mahapurisa (with 32 marks).

User avatar
Kusala
Posts: 747
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 11:02 am

Re: Buddha's skin colour

Post by Kusala » Mon Mar 19, 2018 10:46 am

Mr Man wrote:
Sat Dec 02, 2017 11:11 am
Kusala wrote:
Fri Dec 01, 2017 10:29 pm
I have seen quite a few high caste Indians with blue or green eyes, so it makes perfect sense that the historical Buddha, who belonged to the ruling elite would have blue eyes.
Hi Kusala
Really try and think about this. What you have said does not make sense at all.

What you have said is -

Kusala has seen "quite a few high caste Indians with blue or green eyes" and because of that "it makes perfect sense that the historical Buddha, who belonged to the ruling elite would have blue eyes."

How does that make sense?
Knowing what we know now, such as DNA and all that good stuff, it makes perfect sense...I haven't seen Indians with "forty teeth", but I've seen enough with "blue eyes" to convince me...it's about connecting the dots...we're not talking the whole of India, but just a small number of Indians who still resemble their Aryan forefathers...

Image

The late Indian actor, Raj Kapoor

Image

His granddaughter

Image

Northern Indian toddler

Image

Blue eyed Sadhu

Image

The Buddha's charioteer, Channa, looks pretty similar to the Sadhu pictured above, don't you think?

Image
Image

"He, the Blessed One, is indeed the Noble Lord, the Perfectly Enlightened One;
He is impeccable in conduct and understanding, the Serene One, the Knower of the Worlds;
He trains perfectly those who wish to be trained; he is Teacher of gods and men; he is Awake and Holy. "

--------------------------------------------
"The Dhamma is well-expounded by the Blessed One,
Apparent here and now, timeless, encouraging investigation,
Leading to liberation, to be experienced individually by the wise. "

thomaslaw
Posts: 152
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:55 am
Location: Australia

Re: Buddha's skin colour

Post by thomaslaw » Tue Mar 20, 2018 12:33 am

Kusala wrote:
Mon Mar 19, 2018 10:46 am

Knowing what we know now, such as DNA and all that good stuff, it makes perfect sense...I haven't seen Indians with "forty teeth",
Most adults have 32 teeth. Among these teeth are 8 incisors, 4 canines, 8 premolars, and 12 molars (including 4 wisdom teeth). Most people have a complete set of adult teeth by the time they reach their teenage years.

User avatar
Mr Man
Posts: 3348
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 8:42 am

Re: Buddha's skin colour

Post by Mr Man » Tue Mar 20, 2018 8:17 am

Kusala wrote:
Mon Mar 19, 2018 10:46 am


Blue eyed Sadhu

Image

The Buddha's charioteer, Channa, looks pretty similar to the Sadhu pictured above, don't you think?

Image
:thinking:

User avatar
cappuccino
Posts: 1340
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 1:45 am

Re: Buddha's skin colour

Post by cappuccino » Fri Mar 23, 2018 7:14 am

his skin was the color of skin

his blood was the color of blood

his bones were the color of bones

User avatar
Kusala
Posts: 747
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 11:02 am

Re: Buddha's skin colour

Post by Kusala » Mon May 21, 2018 12:23 am

cappuccino wrote:
Fri Mar 23, 2018 7:14 am
his skin was the color of skin

his blood was the color of blood

his bones were the color of bones
I get what you're saying... people tend to make assumptions when discussing the appearance of the Buddha. The Buddha was from ancient Nepal, so they automatically assume that he'd look like the people from there. Human beings have been moving to different parts of the globe since recorded history.

Take, for instance, these people are all from China, but they don't look like they're from China.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Buddhist history is complex...

Image
Image

"He, the Blessed One, is indeed the Noble Lord, the Perfectly Enlightened One;
He is impeccable in conduct and understanding, the Serene One, the Knower of the Worlds;
He trains perfectly those who wish to be trained; he is Teacher of gods and men; he is Awake and Holy. "

--------------------------------------------
"The Dhamma is well-expounded by the Blessed One,
Apparent here and now, timeless, encouraging investigation,
Leading to liberation, to be experienced individually by the wise. "

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests