Buddha's skin colour

Textual analysis and comparative discussion on early Buddhist sects and texts.
User avatar
pilgrim
Posts: 1542
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:56 pm

Re: Buddha's skin colour

Post by pilgrim » Fri Dec 01, 2017 12:54 am

Ven Metteya Sakyaputta of Lumbini, the last name means a Sakyan son
smiling-metteyya.jpg
smiling-metteyya.jpg (43.07 KiB) Viewed 1510 times

thomaslaw
Posts: 169
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:55 am
Location: Australia

Re: Buddha's skin colour

Post by thomaslaw » Fri Dec 01, 2017 4:48 am

Coëmgenu wrote:
Thu Nov 30, 2017 6:05 pm
thomaslaw wrote:
Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:44 am
The Buddha in the Pali texts does not say he has 32 marks to monks.

Thomas
Its in DN?
The text does not state the Buddha has the 32 marks. The text only states about the great man's marks.

thomaslaw
Posts: 169
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:55 am
Location: Australia

Re: Buddha's skin colour

Post by thomaslaw » Fri Dec 01, 2017 5:28 am

pilgrim wrote:
Fri Dec 01, 2017 12:48 am
People claiming to be Sakyas still live along the southern edge of Nepal and in small communities in India, around Sankasia for eg. But I think intermarriage down thru the centuries have largely diluted physical features of their ethnicity.

Ven.Phra-Anil-Sakya.jpg
Phra Anil Shakya, an ethnic Sakyan of Nepali nationality living in Bangkok.
If Phra Anil Shakya is the same ethnic Sakyan of the Buddha, his ethnic language should be the same language of the Buddha. Good news indeed!

User avatar
Dhammarakkhito
Posts: 1115
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:31 am
Contact:

Re: Buddha's skin colour

Post by Dhammarakkhito » Fri Dec 01, 2017 5:44 am

thomaslaw wrote:
Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:44 am
The Buddha in the Pali texts does not say he has 32 marks to monks.

Thomas
https://suttacentral.net/en/dn14
there's a whole long discourse about the marks as well https://suttacentral.net/en/dn30
Attachments
Screen Shot 2017-11-30 at 23.36.02.png
Screen Shot 2017-11-30 at 23.36.02.png (299.39 KiB) Viewed 1489 times
"Just as the ocean has a single taste — that of salt — in the same way, this Dhamma-Vinaya has a single taste: that of release."
— Ud 5.5

https://www.facebook.com/noblebuddhadha ... 34/?type=3

http://seeingthroughthenet.net/
https://sites.google.com/site/santipada ... allytaught

User avatar
Dhammarakkhito
Posts: 1115
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:31 am
Contact:

Re: Buddha's skin colour

Post by Dhammarakkhito » Fri Dec 01, 2017 5:47 am

race isn't skin color
"Just as the ocean has a single taste — that of salt — in the same way, this Dhamma-Vinaya has a single taste: that of release."
— Ud 5.5

https://www.facebook.com/noblebuddhadha ... 34/?type=3

http://seeingthroughthenet.net/
https://sites.google.com/site/santipada ... allytaught

thomaslaw
Posts: 169
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:55 am
Location: Australia

Re: Buddha's skin colour

Post by thomaslaw » Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:03 am

Sovatthika wrote:
Fri Dec 01, 2017 5:44 am
thomaslaw wrote:
Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:44 am
The Buddha in the Pali texts does not say he has 32 marks to monks.

Thomas
https://suttacentral.net/en/dn14
there's a whole long discourse about the marks as well https://suttacentral.net/en/dn30
Thanks. None of the suttas states that the Buddha says he indeed has the marks!

User avatar
pilgrim
Posts: 1542
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:56 pm

Re: Buddha's skin colour

Post by pilgrim » Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:53 am

thomaslaw wrote:
Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:03 am

Thanks. None of the suttas states that the Buddha says he indeed has the marks!
"These, brethren, are the Thirty-two Marks of the Superman, wherewith endowed he has two careers that lie open to him and none other: that of the Lord of the Wheel and that of Buddha Supreme"
~ Lakkhana sutta, DN30.
Seems clear enough

User avatar
Kusala
Posts: 754
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 11:02 am

Re: Buddha's skin colour

Post by Kusala » Fri Dec 01, 2017 9:38 am

pilgrim wrote:
Fri Dec 01, 2017 12:48 am
People claiming to be Sakyas still live along the southern edge of Nepal and in small communities in India, around Sankasia for eg. But I think intermarriage down thru the centuries have largely diluted physical features of their ethnicity.

Ven.Phra-Anil-Sakya.jpg

Image
Phra Anil Shakya, an ethnic Sakyan of Nepali nationality living in Bangkok.
How is that even possible? Prince Virudhaka of Kosala massacred the Shakyans...even though Kosala was a powerful kingdom back then, they still felt "inferior" to the Shakyans...

Anyway, this blue eyed Nepali Sadhu should offer a pretty convincing argument that the historical Buddha had blue eyes. I don't know about the forty teeth, though. :rofl:

Image
Image

"He, the Blessed One, is indeed the Noble Lord, the Perfectly Enlightened One;
He is impeccable in conduct and understanding, the Serene One, the Knower of the Worlds;
He trains perfectly those who wish to be trained; he is Teacher of gods and men; he is Awake and Holy. "

--------------------------------------------
"The Dhamma is well-expounded by the Blessed One,
Apparent here and now, timeless, encouraging investigation,
Leading to liberation, to be experienced individually by the wise. "

User avatar
Mr Man
Posts: 3368
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 8:42 am

Re: Buddha's skin colour

Post by Mr Man » Fri Dec 01, 2017 9:45 am

Kusala wrote:
Fri Dec 01, 2017 9:38 am

Anyway, this blue eyed Nepali Sadhu should offer a pretty convincing argument that the historical Buddha had blue eyes.
Hi Kusala

Can you please explain how a random picture of a "blue eyed Nepali Sadhu" offers a "pretty convincing argument that the historical Buddha had blue eyes"?

Can you really try and think about that and come back with an answer?

thomaslaw
Posts: 169
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:55 am
Location: Australia

Re: Buddha's skin colour

Post by thomaslaw » Fri Dec 01, 2017 10:13 am

pilgrim wrote:
Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:53 am
thomaslaw wrote:
Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:03 am

Thanks. None of the suttas states that the Buddha says he indeed has the marks!
"These, brethren, are the Thirty-two Marks of the Superman, wherewith endowed he has two careers that lie open to him and none other: that of the Lord of the Wheel and that of Buddha Supreme"
~ Lakkhana sutta, DN30.
Seems clear enough
The Buddha does not say he is a Superman.

User avatar
Dhammanando
Posts: 4207
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:44 pm
Location: Ban Sri Pradu Rubber Forest, Phrao, Chiangmai

Re: Buddha's skin colour

Post by Dhammanando » Fri Dec 01, 2017 12:27 pm

thomaslaw wrote:
Fri Dec 01, 2017 10:13 am
The Buddha does not say he is a Superman.
Not in the Lakkhaṇasutta, but he does elsewhere.

https://suttacentral.net/en/an4.35

thomaslaw
Posts: 169
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:55 am
Location: Australia

Re: Buddha's skin colour

Post by thomaslaw » Fri Dec 01, 2017 4:24 pm

Dhammanando wrote:
Fri Dec 01, 2017 12:27 pm
thomaslaw wrote:
Fri Dec 01, 2017 10:13 am
The Buddha does not say he is a Superman.
Not in the Lakkhaṇasutta, but he does elsewhere.

https://suttacentral.net/en/an4.35
Thanks. But I am unable to see that the text records the Buddha says I am a Great man! The Buddha in the text does not say he is indeed a Great man. The text only states what is Great man between the conversation of the two persons, the brahmin and the Buddha.

User avatar
Dhammanando
Posts: 4207
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:44 pm
Location: Ban Sri Pradu Rubber Forest, Phrao, Chiangmai

Re: Buddha's skin colour

Post by Dhammanando » Fri Dec 01, 2017 4:57 pm

thomaslaw wrote:
Fri Dec 01, 2017 4:24 pm
But I am unable to see that the text records the Buddha says I am a Great man! The Buddha in the text does not say he is indeed a Great man. The text only states what is Great man between the conversation of the two persons, the brahmin and the Buddha.
It does more than that:

Vassakāra gives his view of the characteristics of a mahāpurisa.
The Buddha gives his view.
Vassakāra expresses approval of the Buddha's view and goes on to say that the Buddha possesses those characteristics.
The Buddha confirms that he possesses them.

Given what has preceded it, the Buddha's confirmation is tantamount to asserting his own mahāpurisa-ness.

dharmacorps
Posts: 582
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 7:33 pm

Re: Buddha's skin colour

Post by dharmacorps » Fri Dec 01, 2017 5:33 pm

pilgrim wrote:
Thu Nov 30, 2017 11:05 pm
Modern people are so fearful of being perceived as Racist ( there, I mentioned the elephant in the room), that any mention of skin colour is whispered only with extreme sensitivity. But there is absolutely nothing wrong with being curious of how the founder of our religion looked like. Yes, he's Asian, and probably looked like many north Indians today. If anyone has difficulty picturing that, google Shah Rukh Khan. :tongue:
I agree with this statement about sensitivity but the question is what is the motivation for this obsession with what the Buddha looked like? There are several posts going on right now about it. Seems like an excessive interest. The important things about the Buddha was not his appearance.

User avatar
DNS
Site Admin
Posts: 11811
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:15 am
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, Estados Unidos de América
Contact:

Re: Buddha's skin colour

Post by DNS » Fri Dec 01, 2017 9:33 pm

Mr Man wrote:
Fri Dec 01, 2017 9:45 am
Kusala wrote:
Fri Dec 01, 2017 9:38 am
Anyway, this blue eyed Nepali Sadhu should offer a pretty convincing argument that the historical Buddha had blue eyes.
Hi Kusala
Can you please explain how a random picture of a "blue eyed Nepali Sadhu" offers a "pretty convincing argument that the historical Buddha had blue eyes"?
Can you really try and think about that and come back with an answer?
I agree with Mr Man and am wondering why are you, Kusala, apparently fixated on this idea that the Buddha had blue eyes? It is a theme running through several of your posts when the topic of the Buddha's appearance comes up. You don't appear to be as concerned about the other so-called 32 marks, but you seem to be especially fond of the idea of blue eyes?

I would imagine his eyes were brown like any other typical Indian; afaik, blue is rather rare.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: santimuni and 10 guests