Dhamma Wheel

‘Sabbe sattā āhāraṭṭhitikā’— ‘All sentient beings are sustained by food.’

https://suttacentral.net/an10.27/en/sujato

auto wrote: ↑Fri Feb 08, 2019 12:30 pm ‘Sabbe sattā āhāraṭṭhitikā’— ‘All sentient beings are sustained by food.’

https://suttacentral.net/an10.27/en/sujato

Thanks for that Auto but still does not answer the question. Regards

DooDoot wrote: ↑Fri Feb 08, 2019 10:24 pm

auto wrote: ↑Fri Feb 08, 2019 12:30 pm ‘Sabbe sattā āhāraṭṭhitikā’— ‘All sentient beings are sustained by food.’

https://suttacentral.net/an10.27/en/sujato

Thanks for that Auto but still does not answer the question. Regards

I think 'consciousness ahara' is namarupa (SN 12.63). In consciousness ahara, one should know namarupa.

thomaslaw wrote: ↑Sat Feb 09, 2019 12:23 am I think 'consciousness ahara' is namarupa (SN 12.63). In consciousness ahara, one should know namarupa.

SN 12.63 appears to say:

1. edible food is ahara for sensual desire

2. contact is ahara for feeling

3. volition is ahara for craving

4. consciousness is ahara for nama-rupa

When physical food is comprehended, passion for the five strings of sensuality is comprehended.

When the nutriment of contact is comprehended, the three feelings [pleasure, pain, neither pleasure nor pain] are comprehended.

When the nutriment of intellectual intention is comprehended, the three forms of craving [for sensuality, for becoming, and for non-becoming] are comprehended.

When the nutriment of consciousness is comprehended, nama & rupa are comprehended.

https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitak ... .than.html

DooDoot wrote: ↑Fri Feb 08, 2019 2:47 amAre there any suttas that directly say consciousness has a nutriment (ahara); i.e., where the nutriment is cause & consciousness is the effect?

Ok. I argued in the topic: SN 12.31: Why is the term "nutriment" used ??? the word "nutriment" can be used for any "related condition" in a very broad or general way. Thus, while officially there might be no official or specific teaching about "consciousness having a defined nutriment", it can be said any supportive or related condition for the arising of consciousness (such as nama-rupa or the sense bases) is the nutriment of conscious. This said, I could be wrong.

Srilankaputra wrote: ↑Fri Feb 08, 2019 3:22 am Do these count ?

alfa wrote: ↑Fri Feb 08, 2019 6:53 am Aren't they the same, more or less? A depends on B for its existence. A 'feeds' on B for its existence.

SarathW wrote: ↑Fri Feb 08, 2019 10:05 am Consciousness can't sustain without six senses.

thomaslaw wrote: ↑Sat Feb 09, 2019 12:23 amI think 'consciousness ahara' is namarupa (SN 12.63). In consciousness ahara, one should know namarupa.

OK. While the word "nutriment" was not directly found above, it probably counts & can be used in a very general way in these contexts.