How can you come to that conclusion without even read the CMA? And I know you have not read it. If you did, you'd never mistaken cetasikanca for Cetasika.
Origination of feelings
Re: Origination of feelings
Re: Origination of feelings
Re: Origination of feelings
I did read CMA. You did not read CMA. I explained the difference to you. You continue to mistaken them afterward. You actually did not read a single word. Otherwise you'd never make this absurd claim:
thomaslaw wrote:The point is the SN sutta about the two feelings (kayika vedana and cetasika vedana) is opposed to the "Cetasika" classification in Comprehensive Manual of Abdhidhamma.
Re: Origination of feelings
This is because you ask:santa100 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 01, 2018 5:26 amI did read CMA. You did not read CMA. I explained the difference to you. You continue to mistaken them afterward. You actually did not read a single word. Otherwise you'd never make this absurd claim:thomaslaw wrote:The point is the SN sutta about the two feelings (kayika vedana and cetasika vedana) is opposed to the "Cetasika" classification in Comprehensive Manual of Abdhidhamma.
"I know SN 36.6, the Dart Sutta. Please provide the exact quote where it says KayaVedana sits outside the Cetasika group? Everyone already know feeling can be physical or mental, but where do you see it says physical feeling sits outside the Cetasika group, as opposed to the classification in Comprehensive Manual of Abdhidhamma?"
Re: Origination of feelings
And after 19 posts, you have not provided a single direct quote from any source to back up your claim. Case in point, you have not answered my question above.thomaslaw wrote: ↑Sat Dec 01, 2018 5:35 am This is because you ask:
"I know SN 36.6, the Dart Sutta. Please provide the exact quote where it says KayaVedana sits outside the Cetasika group? Everyone already know feeling can be physical or mental, but where do you see it says physical feeling sits outside the Cetasika group, as opposed to the classification in Comprehensive Manual of Abdhidhamma?"
Re: Origination of feelings
As I replied before:santa100 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 01, 2018 5:37 amAnd after 19 posts, you have not provided a single direct quote from any source to back up your claim. Case in point, you have not answered my question above.thomaslaw wrote: ↑Sat Dec 01, 2018 5:35 am This is because you ask:
"I know SN 36.6, the Dart Sutta. Please provide the exact quote where it says KayaVedana sits outside the Cetasika group? Everyone already know feeling can be physical or mental, but where do you see it says physical feeling sits outside the Cetasika group, as opposed to the classification in Comprehensive Manual of Abdhidhamma?"
See SN 36.6 (= SA 470) (pp. 109-111 in Fundamental Teachings of Early Buddhism): Kayika vedana is not the same as cetasika vedana.
Re: Origination of feelings
For a thousandth time, I didn't ask you the difference between physical and mental feelings. Everyone know they're different. I asked you where in SN 36.6 does it say physical feeling is not under the Cetasika group. Do you understand the difference between Cetasika group versus mental feeling/CetasikancaVedana after I explained it to you? yes or no?
Last edited by santa100 on Sat Dec 01, 2018 5:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Origination of feelings
It will be better if you make clear the difference between Cetasika group versus mental feeling.santa100 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 01, 2018 5:50 amFor a thousandth time, I didn't ask you the difference between physical and mental feelings. Everyone know they're different. I asked where in SN 36.6 does it say physical feeling is not under the Cetasika group. Do you understand the difference between Cetasika group versus mental feeling? yes or no?
