In SN 56.11 and other suttas (such as MN 56), the stream-enterers such as Kondañña arose due to the following realisation:
In SN 56.11, prior to the realisation, it was taught:“yaṃ kiñci samudayadhammaṃ sabbaṃ taṃ nirodhadhamman”ti
Everything that has a beginning has an end (Sujato).
Whatever is subject to origination is all subject to cessation. (Bodhi)
Whatever is subject to origination is all subject to cessation. (Thanissaro)
Whatever is subject to arising is all subject to cessation. (Ñanamoli)
Whatever has the nature of arising, has the nature of ceasing. (Piyadassi)
My question for discussion is how did the teaching about the arising & cesssation of craving & suffering result in the realisation of "whatever is subject to origination is all subject to cessation"?Now this, bhikkhus, is the noble truth of the origin of suffering: it is this craving which leads to renewed becoming, accompanied by delight and lust, seeking delight here and there; that is, craving for sensual pleasure, craving for becoming, craving for non-becoming..
Now this, bhikkhus, is the noble truth of the cessation of suffering: it is the remainderless fading away and cessation of that same craving, the giving up and relinquishing of it, freedom from it, nonreliance on it..