How do Pa-auk Sayadaw's teachings hold up to the EBTs?

Textual analysis and comparative discussion on early Buddhist sects and texts.
Post Reply
User avatar
Posts: 569
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 1:48 am
Location: San Francisco

How do Pa-auk Sayadaw's teachings hold up to the EBTs?

Post by dylanj » Mon Jan 15, 2018 7:31 am

susukhaṃ vata nibbānaṃ,
asokaṃ virajaṃ khemaṃ,
yattha dukkhaṃ nirujjhatī

Oh! extinction is so very blissful,
As taught by the One Rightly Self-Awakened:
Sorrowless, stainless, secure;
Where suffering all ceases

etaṁ santaṁ etaṁ panītaṁ yadidaṁ sabbasaṅkhārasamatho sabbūpadhipaṭi nissaggo taṇhakkhayo virāgo nirodho nibbānaṁ

This is peaceful, this is excellent, that is: the stilling of all fabrications, the relinquishment of all attachments, the destruction of craving, detachment, cessation, extinction.

User avatar
Posts: 161
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2015 8:22 pm

Re: How do Pa-auk Sayadaw's teachings hold up to the EBTs?

Post by Subharo » Wed Jan 24, 2018 1:55 am

That sound of crickets you hear in response to your question is your answer.
Last edited by Subharo on Wed Jan 24, 2018 5:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
Subharo Bhikkhu
"There is but one taste on this path, the taste of freedom" -The Buddha :buddha1:

User avatar
Posts: 15507
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:37 am
Location: Aotearoa, New Zealand

Re: How do Pa-auk Sayadaw's teachings hold up to the EBTs?

Post by mikenz66 » Wed Jan 24, 2018 2:54 am

It's kind of a non-question, since Pa-auk's approach is firmly grounded in the Commentaries and Visuddhimagga. So, it's really a question of whether one regards those later developments as a logical progression that is compatible with the suttas, or as something deviant. There's little point in rehashing those arguments. Some find the Theravada approach really helpful, some don't. YMMV.

Having said that, Pa Auk teaches a highly-absorbed jhana approach that is comparable to, say Ajahn Brahm (access to jhana via light nimittas, deep absorption isolated from external stimulus, insight developed after exiting the jhana). Ajahn Brahm, claims to be teaching from the suttas.

Whereas many other "sutta" teachers teach a very different, much less absorbed, jhana, within which one can gain insight:

However, the Early Buddhism Forum is probably not the place for discussions of how the various modern teachers interpret jhana in their various ways. There is already a Great Jhana Debate thread here:


Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Yahoo [Bot] and 8 guests