Hostility to Ananda

Textual analysis and comparative discussion on early Buddhist sects and scriptures.
Bankei
Posts: 430
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 4:40 am

Hostility to Ananda

Post by Bankei »

Ananda seems to get a hard time in some sections of the Pali canon. There sees to be some hostility to him even though he was the closest companion to the Buddha. The Buddha himself gives Ananda a hard time in the Mahaparinibbana Sutta and he nearly doesn't make it into the first council an then when he does he is criticised for various 'offences' an faults.

From a 'classical Theravada' point of view, why is this so?

Thoughts from other traditions also welcome.

Bankei
-----------------------
Bankei
User avatar
mikenz66
Posts: 19941
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:37 am
Location: Aotearoa, New Zealand

Re: Hostility to Ananda

Post by mikenz66 »

Hi Bankei,

I can't right now locate a good reference, but I'm sure I have read somewhere that there is evidence, in the evolution of the suttas, of a power struggle involving Maha Kassapa and Ananada.

These are the closest things I can locate, but they doesn't really have any details:
Maha Kassapa, Father of the Sangha, by Hellmuth Hecker
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/auth ... 5.html#ch8" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Ananda, The Guardian of the Dhamma, by Hellmuth Hecker
http://www.bps.lk/olib/wh/wh273-p.html# ... ftheBuddha" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

:anjali:
Mike
User avatar
Cittasanto
Posts: 6646
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
Location: Ellan Vannin
Contact:

Re: Hostility to Ananda

Post by Cittasanto »

Bankei wrote:Ananda seems to get a hard time in some sections of the Pali canon. There sees to be some hostility to him even though he was the closest companion to the Buddha. The Buddha himself gives Ananda a hard time in the Mahaparinibbana Sutta and he nearly doesn't make it into the first council an then when he does he is criticised for various 'offences' an faults.

From a 'classical Theravada' point of view, why is this so?

Thoughts from other traditions also welcome.

Bankei
can you give an example of each kind of occurrence and why you think it unfair?
Blog, Suttas, Aj Chah, Facebook.

He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them.
But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion …
...
He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.
John Stuart Mill
User avatar
mikenz66
Posts: 19941
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:37 am
Location: Aotearoa, New Zealand

Re: Hostility to Ananda

Post by mikenz66 »

The obvious example of negativity directed at Ananda is in the Mahasatipatthana Sutta:
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .vaji.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"Then, Ananda, the fault is yours. Herein have you failed, inasmuch as you were unable to grasp the plain suggestion, the significant prompting given by the Tathagata, and you did not then entreat the Tathagata to remain. For if you had done so, Ananda, twice the Tathagata might have declined, but the third time he would have consented. Therefore, Ananda, the fault is yours; herein have you failed.
There is more on this in the Vinaya, but I don't have a personal copy...

:anjali:
Mike
Bankei
Posts: 430
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 4:40 am

Re: Hostility to Ananda

Post by Bankei »

Hi

Well, just off the top of my head
1. Buddha gives a hint to Ananda that he will lenghten his life but Ananda fails to get the point and therefore fails to request him to do so.
2. Ananda cries when he realises the Buddha is going to die - possibly because he has not yet become an arahat and he wouldn't have a teacher to assist

And, later
1. there are 499 arahat getting ready for the first council, but Ananda is only reluctantly invited.
2. Ananda is criticsed at the council for
a. Allowing women to be admitted to the order
b. accdently exposed the Buddha's body to women when moving his corpse.
c. He forgot to ask the Buddha what he meant by lessor minor rules
d. He stepped on the Buddha's robe
-----------------------
Bankei
User avatar
Cittasanto
Posts: 6646
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
Location: Ellan Vannin
Contact:

Re: Hostility to Ananda

Post by Cittasanto »

1. Buddha gives a hint to Ananda that he will lenghten his life but Ananda fails to get the point and therefore fails to request him to do so.
2. Ananda cries when he realises the Buddha is going to die - possibly because he has not yet become an arahat and he wouldn't have a teacher to assist
how are these examples?

And, later
1. there are 499 arahat getting ready for the first council, but Ananda is only reluctantly invited. - he wasn't enlightened at the time of the invite, as everyone else was, not a personal thing, rather a matter of something else.

a. Allowing women to be admitted to the order - Ananda didn't allow this the, Buddha did! Ananda persuaded the Buddha and this was criticised, his reaction here is/should be an example.
b. accdently exposed the Buddha's body to women when moving his corpse. - he should of been more careful
c. He forgot to ask the Buddha what he meant by lessor minor rules - given the discussion that was around this quite an important thing to forget.
d. He stepped on the Buddha's robe - he should of been more careful, given the cultural association with the feet that can be seen in the canon, one can guess it is similar to the Thailand or Burma tradition, it was possibly seen as worse than just what it was.

Ananda also broke precepts in-order to serve the Buddha and this was criticised because it is more important to keep the rules properly than haphazardly.
Blog, Suttas, Aj Chah, Facebook.

He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them.
But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion …
...
He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.
John Stuart Mill
User avatar
mikenz66
Posts: 19941
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:37 am
Location: Aotearoa, New Zealand

Re: Hostility to Ananda

Post by mikenz66 »

Cittasanto wrote:
1. Buddha gives a hint to Ananda that he will lenghten his life but Ananda fails to get the point and therefore fails to request him to do so.
2. Ananda cries when he realises the Buddha is going to die - possibly because he has not yet become an arahat and he wouldn't have a teacher to assist
how are these examples?
As I explained above, there is an argument that those passages were inserted as a result of political machinations within the Sangha. I'm sure this is all spelled out in detail in some academic treatise or other...

However, if we are discussing it from a Classical Theravada point of view, rather than a historical-sutta-analysis point of view, perhaps the answer is simply that on the evidence of the suttas and vinaya Ananda was a bit dense.

:anjali:
Mike
User avatar
Zom
Posts: 2712
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 6:38 pm
Location: Russia, Saint-Petersburg
Contact:

Re: Hostility to Ananda

Post by Zom »

Here is the link about 1st Council (Vinaya, Culavagga, 11)

http://www.sacred-texts.com/bud/sbe20/sbe20119.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


1) 'That was ill done by thee, friend Ânanda, in that thou didst not ask the Blessed One which were the lesser and minor precepts. Confess thy fault.'

'Through forgetfulness was it, Sirs, that I did not ask that of the Blessed One. I see no fault therein. Nevertheless, out of my faith in you, I confess that as a fault.'

2) 'This also, friend Ânanda, was ill done by thee, in that thou steppedst upon the Blessed One's rainy-season garment to sew it. Confess thy fault.'

'It was not, Sirs, through any want of respect to the Blessed One that I did so. I see no fault therein. Nevertheless, out of my faith in you, I confess that as a fault.'

3) 'This also, friend Ânanda, was ill done by thee, in that thou causedst the body of the Blessed One to be saluted by women first 2, so that by their weeping the body of the Blessed One was defiled by tears. Confess that fault.'

'I did so, Sirs, with the intention that they should not be kept beyond due time. I see no fault therein. Nevertheless, out of my faith in you, I confess that as a fault.'

4) 'This too, friend Ânanda, was ill done by thee, in that even when a suggestion so evident and a hint so clear were given thee by the Blessed One, thou didst not beseech him, saying, "Let the Blessed One remain on for a kalpa! Let the Happy One remain on for a kalpa for the good and happiness of the
great multitudes, out of pity for the world, for the good and the gain and the weal of gods and men 1!" Confess that fault.'

'I was possessed (by the Evil One) 2, friends, when I refrained from so beseeching him. I see no fault therein. Nevertheless, out of my faith in you, I confess that as a fault.'

5) This also, friend Ânanda, was ill done by thee, in that thou exertedst thyself to procure admission for women into the Dhamma and Vinaya proclaimed by the Tathâgata 3. Confess that fault.'

'That did I do, friends, thinking of Mahâ Pagâpatî the Gotamî, the sister of the Blessed One's mother; his nurse and comforter, who gave him milk; how she, when she who had borne him was dead, herself suckled him as with mother's milk. I see no fault therein. Nevertheless, out of my faith in you, I confess that as a fault.'
User avatar
Cittasanto
Posts: 6646
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:31 pm
Location: Ellan Vannin
Contact:

Re: Hostility to Ananda

Post by Cittasanto »

mikenz66 wrote:However, if we are discussing it from a Classical Theravada point of view, rather than a historical-sutta-analysis point of view, perhaps the answer is simply that on the evidence of the suttas and vinaya Ananda was a bit dense.
I could agree here to an extent, Ananda was 'admonished' on several occasions for his conduct, which in light of him being a monk he did fall fowl of the precepts and made faux pas on occasion, but I do not see any hostility towards him due to this, it was a concern for his welfare.
my questioning how the examples were showing hostility was because that is not to my understanding what the interpretation is of any tradition, or at any time (except for the complaint about the Bhikkhuni acceptance which has been for one reason or another), as inviting admonishment and accepting admonishment is a good thing and found in all traditions and goes back to the earliest days, Ananda shows great respect to this even though he does not see all the things as faults.
however for a truly classical understanding of these we would need to look at the commentary's and I don't know if a translation exists, to be able to check these occurances, and maybe the path of purification may shed light on admonishment which could inform here? but that is my sense of how it has been understood traditionally.
Blog, Suttas, Aj Chah, Facebook.

He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them.
But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion …
...
He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.
John Stuart Mill
Sanghamitta
Posts: 1614
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:21 am
Location: By the River Thames near London.

Re: Hostility to Ananda

Post by Sanghamitta »

These stories appear to me to be characteristic of the way that lives become mythologised. This does not render them pointless. The process happens for a reason..usually to stand as examples , role models and cautions to others. But they generally need unpacking. A literal reading seems to be to smack of naivety.
The going for refuge is the door of entrance to the teachings of the Buddha.

Bhikku Bodhi.
User avatar
ancientbuddhism
Posts: 887
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 12:53 pm
Location: Cyberia

Re: Hostility to Ananda

Post by ancientbuddhism »

mikenz66 wrote:Hi Bankei,

I can't right now locate a good reference, but I'm sure I have read somewhere that there is evidence, in the evolution of the suttas, of a power struggle involving Maha Kassapa and Ananada.

These are the closest things I can locate, but they doesn't really have any details:
Maha Kassapa, Father of the Sangha, by Hellmuth Hecker
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/auth ... 5.html#ch8" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Ananda, The Guardian of the Dhamma, by Hellmuth Hecker
http://www.bps.lk/olib/wh/wh273-p.html# ... ftheBuddha" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

:anjali:
Mike
Perhaps an indication of contention could be this section of the Mahāparinibbāna Sutta (DN.16.13), where Ānanda expresses a wish for ‘some pronouncement about the Bhikkhu-saṅghā.’
  • na tāva bhagavā parinibbāyissati, na yāva bhagavā bhikkhusaṅghaṃ ārabbha kiñcideva udāharatī’”ti."

    “May the Sublime One not enter parinibbāna, not until the Sublime One has made some pronouncement about the Bhikkhu-saṅgha.”
To which the Buddha replied with inference that this question was with reference to a successor:
  • kimpanānanda bhikkhusaṅgho mayi paccāsiṃsati: desito ānanda, mayā dhammo anantaraṃ abāhiraṃ karitvā natthānanda tathāgatassa dhammesu ācariyamuṭṭhi. Yassa nūna ānanda evamassa: 'ahaṃ bhikkhusaṅghaṃ pariharissāmī'ti vā, mamuddesiko bhikkhusaṅgho'ti vā, so nūna ānanda, bhikkhusaṅghaṃ ārabbha kiñcideva udāhareyya. Tathāgatassa kho ānanda na evaṃ hoti: 'ahaṃ bhikkhusaṅghaṃ pariharissāmī'ti vā mamuddesiko bhikkhusaṅgho'ti vā. Sa kiṃ ānanda tathāgato bhikkhusaṅghaṃ ārabbha kiñcideva udāharissati?”

    “But, Ānanda, what expectation has the community of monks from me? I have taught the Dhamma, Ānanda, making neither an esoteric nor an exoteric (anantaraṃ abāhiraṃ lit. ‘an inside or an outside’). Ānanda, the Tathāgata has not held the ‘closed hand of a teacher’ (ācariyamuṭṭhi) with regard to the Dhamma. Indeed, Ānanda, if there is anyone who thinks, “I shall attend to the community of monks”, or “the community of monks shall be led by me”, Ānanda surly he could make some statement regarding the community of monks. Indeed Ānanda, as far as the Tathāgata is concerned, such does not exist – (na evaṃ hoti) “I shall attend to the community of monks”, or “the community of monks shall be led by me”; so why should the Tathāgata make such a statement regarding the community of monks?”
The Buddha then gives the following admonition in the famous lines:
  • "Evaṃ kho ānanda, bhikkhu attadīpo viharati attasaraṇo anaññasaraṇo, dhammadīpo dhammasaraṇo anaññasaraṇo. ..."

    “Therefore, Ānanda, abide as an island unto yourselves, as a refuge unto yourselves, with no other refuge - with the Dhamma as your island, the Dhamma as your refuge, with no other refuge. ...”
I say, beware of all enterprises that require new clothes, and not rather a new wearer of clothes.” – Henry David Thoreau, Walden, 1854

Secure your own mask before assisting others. – NORTHWEST AIRLINES (Pre-Flight Instruction)

A Handful of Leaves
daverupa
Posts: 5980
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:58 pm

Re: Hostility to Ananda

Post by daverupa »

Somewhat related:

Kassapa and Ananda – after the parinibbana, by Bhante Sujato.
We’re familiar with image of Mahakassapa as a grizzly monk with a dour perspective on women, and his consequent antagonism with Ananda. I’ve just been reviewing a few of the texts that have helped create this image, and as usual a close look reveals a more nuanced perspective. There are two Suttas from the Kassapa Samyutta, SN 16.10 and 16.11, each of which has two Chinese versions as well. You can find English translations here; scroll down to 15.1.10 and 15.1.11. Here’s a little comparative study I’ve been working on.
  • "And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting oneself one protects others? By the pursuit, development, and cultivation of the four establishments of mindfulness. It is in such a way that by protecting oneself one protects others.

    "And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting others one protects oneself? By patience, harmlessness, goodwill, and sympathy. It is in such a way that by protecting others one protects oneself.

- Sedaka Sutta [SN 47.19]
User avatar
mikenz66
Posts: 19941
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:37 am
Location: Aotearoa, New Zealand

Re: Hostility to Ananda

Post by mikenz66 »

Thanks for finding that, Dave.

Note that this thread is now in "Early Buddhism", which is a better place to discuss historical analysis.

:anjali:
Mike
Bankei
Posts: 430
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 4:40 am

Re: Hostility to Ananda

Post by Bankei »

Thank you for all the replies. Please keep em coming!

I just found it rather strange that Ananda seems to be singled out. No other monk seems to have received the same or similar treatment and this is odd given Ananda's role in the religion. Also by the time of the council Ananda is an arahat yet is still criticised for his past actions.

For those interested I have come across a very interesting Ph.D. Thesis. It is 524 pages long and I am only up to p 24, but looks very interesting so far. It is freely downloadable too:

Freedman, Michael
1977 The Characterization of Ananda in the PAli canon of the TheravAda: A Hagiographic Study.
Ph.D. dissertation, McMaster University
http://digitalcommons.mcmaster.ca/opend ... ions/3131/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-----------------------
Bankei
Bankei
Posts: 430
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 4:40 am

Re: Hostility to Ananda

Post by Bankei »

daverupa wrote:Somewhat related:

Kassapa and Ananda – after the parinibbana, by Bhante Sujato.
We’re familiar with image of Mahakassapa as a grizzly monk with a dour perspective on women, and his consequent antagonism with Ananda. I’ve just been reviewing a few of the texts that have helped create this image, and as usual a close look reveals a more nuanced perspective. There are two Suttas from the Kassapa Samyutta, SN 16.10 and 16.11, each of which has two Chinese versions as well. You can find English translations here; scroll down to 15.1.10 and 15.1.11. Here’s a little comparative study I’ve been working on.
Thanks Dave. I had not read this. Interesting comments there too.

Bankei
-----------------------
Bankei
Post Reply