how do we know what the buddha looked like?

A forum for beginners and members of other Buddhist traditions to ask questions about Theravāda (The Way of the Elders). Responses require moderator approval before they are visible.
diamind
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2017 7:26 am

Re: how do we know what the buddha looked like?

Post by diamind » Mon Aug 13, 2018 6:49 pm

So basically its a modern day corruption to have a image of the Buddha? Why is Thailand etc.. full of buddha statues if there is nothing in the cannon about making images. This is strange.

User avatar
Dhammanando
Posts: 4166
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:44 pm
Location: Ban Sri Pradu Rubber Forest, Phrao, Chiangmai

Re: how do we know what the buddha looked like?

Post by Dhammanando » Mon Aug 13, 2018 7:55 pm

diamind wrote:
Mon Aug 13, 2018 1:22 pm
Did buddha ever say NOT to make images of him?
In Pali sources there is no mention of the question ever being raised.

cookiemonster
Posts: 186
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:42 am

Re: how do we know what the buddha looked like?

Post by cookiemonster » Mon Aug 13, 2018 9:34 pm

diamind wrote:
Mon Aug 13, 2018 6:49 pm
So basically its a modern day corruption to have a image of the Buddha? Why is Thailand etc.. full of buddha statues if there is nothing in the cannon about making images. This is strange.
I see it as a type of Buddhanusatti.

diamind
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2017 7:26 am

Re: how do we know what the buddha looked like?

Post by diamind » Tue Aug 14, 2018 1:39 am

cookiemonster wrote:
Mon Aug 13, 2018 9:34 pm
diamind wrote:
Mon Aug 13, 2018 6:49 pm
So basically its a modern day corruption to have a image of the Buddha? Why is Thailand etc.. full of buddha statues if there is nothing in the cannon about making images. This is strange.
I see it as a type of Buddhanusatti.
But if there is no mention of his form in the pali cannon where was it adopted? Carelessly from the mahayana?

User avatar
DNS
Site Admin
Posts: 11779
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:15 am
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, Estados Unidos de América
Contact:

Re: how do we know what the buddha looked like?

Post by DNS » Tue Aug 14, 2018 2:22 am

diamind wrote:
Tue Aug 14, 2018 1:39 am
But if there is no mention of his form in the pali cannon where was it adopted? Carelessly from the mahayana?
see this article:
There is enough incidental information in the Tipiñaka to get a good idea about the Buddha's physical appearance. . . . .

Although statues of the Buddha always show him with hair, this is an iconographic convention and is not historically accurate. After his renunciation, like all other monks, he `cut off his hair and beard' (M.I,163).
http://buddhisma2z.com/content.php?id=310

User avatar
Kusala
Posts: 752
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 11:02 am

Re: how do we know what the buddha looked like?

Post by Kusala » Tue Aug 14, 2018 3:54 am

diamind wrote:
Tue Aug 14, 2018 1:39 am
cookiemonster wrote:
Mon Aug 13, 2018 9:34 pm
diamind wrote:
Mon Aug 13, 2018 6:49 pm
So basically its a modern day corruption to have a image of the Buddha? Why is Thailand etc.. full of buddha statues if there is nothing in the cannon about making images. This is strange.
I see it as a type of Buddhanusatti.
But if there is no mention of his form in the pali cannon where was it adopted? Carelessly from the mahayana?
Someone please feel free to correct me, but from my limited knowledge, it was the Bactrian Greeks who first created the Buddha statue. The Buddha was modeled after the Greek God, "Apollo", I believe...
Image

"He, the Blessed One, is indeed the Noble Lord, the Perfectly Enlightened One;
He is impeccable in conduct and understanding, the Serene One, the Knower of the Worlds;
He trains perfectly those who wish to be trained; he is Teacher of gods and men; he is Awake and Holy. "

--------------------------------------------
"The Dhamma is well-expounded by the Blessed One,
Apparent here and now, timeless, encouraging investigation,
Leading to liberation, to be experienced individually by the wise. "

User avatar
LG2V
Posts: 271
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:40 pm

Re: how do we know what the buddha looked like?

Post by LG2V » Tue Aug 14, 2018 9:29 am

It's possible that Buddha's eyes were not blue at all, but rather brown. 'Nila' translates to "dark color" in general. They could have been brown or blue.

'Nila' is the reason why Moggallana, Krishna and Shiva are often depicted as blue in Indian art. It's modern interpretation means 'blue', but it was often used to refer to black or brown objects. The adjective is used to describe Moggallana's and Uppalavanna's skin.

There's an interesting theory that, linguisticly, the color 'blue' is actually a relatively recent arrival: https://thedoctorweighsin.com/evolution ... olor-blue/

I personally don't agree with it, but it makes for an interesting read.
Here are some excellent sites for giving free Dana (Click-Based Donation):
http://freerice.comhttp://greatergood.com/www.ripple.orgwww.thenonprofits.com

User avatar
Kusala
Posts: 752
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 11:02 am

Re: how do we know what the buddha looked like?

Post by Kusala » Tue Aug 14, 2018 11:21 pm

LG2V wrote:
Tue Aug 14, 2018 9:29 am
It's possible that Buddha's eyes were not blue at all, but rather brown. 'Nila' translates to "dark color" in general. They could have been brown or blue.

'Nila' is the reason why Moggallana, Krishna and Shiva are often depicted as blue in Indian art. It's modern interpretation means 'blue', but it was often used to refer to black or brown objects. The adjective is used to describe Moggallana's and Uppalavanna's skin.

There's an interesting theory that, linguisticly, the color 'blue' is actually a relatively recent arrival: https://thedoctorweighsin.com/evolution ... olor-blue/

I personally don't agree with it, but it makes for an interesting read.
That's also possible. However, we have to take into consideration that the meaning of words can change over time. For instance, The word "Arya(n)" originally meant something totally different. See ----> "The ethnic meaning of Arya" http://koenraadelst.blogspot.com/2011/0 ... -arya.html

This is why I think genetics carries more weight than just some ancient texts...

Image
Image

"He, the Blessed One, is indeed the Noble Lord, the Perfectly Enlightened One;
He is impeccable in conduct and understanding, the Serene One, the Knower of the Worlds;
He trains perfectly those who wish to be trained; he is Teacher of gods and men; he is Awake and Holy. "

--------------------------------------------
"The Dhamma is well-expounded by the Blessed One,
Apparent here and now, timeless, encouraging investigation,
Leading to liberation, to be experienced individually by the wise. "

pegembara
Posts: 1289
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 8:39 am

Re: how do we know what the buddha looked like?

Post by pegembara » Wed Aug 15, 2018 8:14 am

We know that the Buddha was bald.
(1) the core canon explicitly describes the Buddha as a bald-shaven man; moreover, (2) implicitly, these texts are incompatible with the historically-subsequent assumptions about the Buddha’s physical appearance now commonly found in statuary.

http://www.newmandala.org/the-buddha-was-bald/
And what is right speech? Abstaining from lying, from divisive speech, from abusive speech, & from idle chatter: This is called right speech.

dharmacorps
Posts: 562
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 7:33 pm

Re: how do we know what the buddha looked like?

Post by dharmacorps » Wed Aug 15, 2018 4:26 pm

Vasettha Sutta:

599. The world is enlightened, we ask Gotama, does one become a brahmin by birth or else by actions? We do not know this, enlighten us so that we may know the brahmin. "

600. The Blessed One said:

"Vaseññha, I will tell you step by step how it happens, The classification of living things in this and other births.

601. Look at the grass and trees, although they are not aware, This and the other have attributes peculiar to their births.
602. So also insects, like grasshoppers and ants They have attributes peculiar to their births.
603. Look at the animals small and large They have attributes peculiar to their births.
604. Look at the serpents with long backs going on their bellies, They have attributes peculiar to their births.
605. Look at the fish too, who find food in the water. They have attributes peculiar to their births.
606. Look at the birds flying through the air. They have attributes peculiar to their births.
607. Although these have various attributes, at birth, In humans various attributes are not evident at birth.
608. They are not in the hair, head, ears or eyes Not in the mouth, nose, lips or eye-lashes
609. Not in the neck, flanks stomach or back, Not in the buttocks, chest, pudendum, nor in the sexual intercourse.
610. Not in the hands, feet, fingers or nails, nor in the knees and calves, Not in the hue or voice, by which to know their birth.

User avatar
Kusala
Posts: 752
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 11:02 am

Re: how do we know what the buddha looked like?

Post by Kusala » Thu Aug 16, 2018 9:46 am

LG2V wrote:
Tue Aug 14, 2018 9:29 am
It's possible that Buddha's eyes were not blue at all, but rather brown. 'Nila' translates to "dark color" in general. They could have been brown or blue.

'Nila' is the reason why Moggallana, Krishna and Shiva are often depicted as blue in Indian art. It's modern interpretation means 'blue', but it was often used to refer to black or brown objects. The adjective is used to describe Moggallana's and Uppalavanna's skin.

There's an interesting theory that, linguisticly, the color 'blue' is actually a relatively recent arrival: https://thedoctorweighsin.com/evolution ... olor-blue/

I personally don't agree with it, but it makes for an interesting read.
Shravasti Dhammika wrote an interesting piece on "Krishna". I used to wonder why Hindu deities were depicted as blue in Indian art. Know I know why...See ----> "The Buddha Meets The Dark Lord" http://sdhammika.blogspot.com/2009/07/b ... -lord.html
Image

"He, the Blessed One, is indeed the Noble Lord, the Perfectly Enlightened One;
He is impeccable in conduct and understanding, the Serene One, the Knower of the Worlds;
He trains perfectly those who wish to be trained; he is Teacher of gods and men; he is Awake and Holy. "

--------------------------------------------
"The Dhamma is well-expounded by the Blessed One,
Apparent here and now, timeless, encouraging investigation,
Leading to liberation, to be experienced individually by the wise. "

User avatar
Crazy cloud
Posts: 489
Joined: Sun May 12, 2013 8:55 am

Re: how do we know what the buddha looked like?

Post by Crazy cloud » Thu Aug 16, 2018 11:01 am

Is the image of Lord Buddha, experienced by numerous meditators after his paranibba, actually not the true and right picture of him ...

:sage:
If you didn't care
What happened to me
And I didn't care for you

We would zig-zag our way
Through the boredom and pain
Occasionally glancing up through the rain

Wondering which of the
Buggers to blame
And watching for pigs on the wing
- Roger Waters

markandeya
Posts: 204
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2018 11:33 am

Re: how do we know what the buddha looked like?

Post by markandeya » Thu Aug 16, 2018 11:30 am

Kusala wrote:
Tue Aug 14, 2018 3:54 am
diamind wrote:
Tue Aug 14, 2018 1:39 am
cookiemonster wrote:
Mon Aug 13, 2018 9:34 pm


I see it as a type of Buddhanusatti.
But if there is no mention of his form in the pali cannon where was it adopted? Carelessly from the mahayana?
Someone please feel free to correct me, but from my limited knowledge, it was the Bactrian Greeks who first created the Buddha statue. The Buddha was modeled after the Greek God, "Apollo", I believe...
This seems to be right as far as I know. Early Buddhist sites would mostly display the asthamangala or eight auspicious symbols/signs.

Endless knot,Lotus flower,Dhvaja,Dharmachakra, Bumpa,Golden Fish,Parasol,Conch.

It became more anthropomorphic due to western influences.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests