Ah, thanks for pointing out the 'I'... that might have been embarassing if i'd have put a full stop on the end!
Thanks again for all your help, I think I can go ahead with what I wanted to do now.
Pali/Devanagari/Magadhi deadend?!!
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 8:04 am
Re: Pali/Devanagari/Magadhi deadend?!!
Out of interest, can I assume that there's now right or wrong way for these aspects to be followed in terms of the way they're written down? The way they've been listed so far in this thread is just the way they were written; there's nothing to say if they are to be reproduced in another form that they HAVE to be listed in that specific order? Kinda seems like it would go against the nature of the path itself, but I thought i'd ask.
Re: Pali/Devanagari/Magadhi deadend?!!
Thanks for your insightful remarks. I think that your solution is plausible.Kare wrote:I find it strange that no one has suggested this simple answer to the Pali-Magadhi problem. And if I am wrong, at least I would like to see it refuted.
Bhagavaṃmūlakā no, bhante, dhammā...