Greetings.
The grammars I consulted say not much about the general use of Pāli "vā". Is "vā ... vā" always to be rendered "either ... or" or is simple "or" to be preferred? Which regulations exist to help distinguish?
Thank you very much!
Grammatical Rules Regarding "vā"
Moderator: Mahavihara moderator
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2017 1:40 pm
- Contact:
Grammatical Rules Regarding "vā"
"One should not consider the faults of others, nor their doing or not doing good or bad deeds. One should consider only whether one has done or not done good or bad deeds." -- The Buddha (Dhp.50)
Website: www.embracing-buddhism.jimdo.com
Website: www.embracing-buddhism.jimdo.com
- Dhammanando
- Posts: 3861
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:44 pm
- Location: Ban Sri Pradu Cremation Ground, Phrao District, Chiangmai
Re: Grammatical Rules Regarding "vā"
The English distinction between “either x or y” and “x or y” is merely stylistic, not semantic, and has no equivalent in Pali.
In their discussion of vā Pali grammarians drew a distinction between vikappana and sampiṇḍana, that is, a disjunctive ‘or’ and a conjunctive ‘and’.
Vikappana
samaṇā vā brāmaṇā vā
Sampiṇḍana
bhūtā vā sambhavesī vā
sabbe sattā bhavantu sukhitattā
(Karaṇīyamettasutta)
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2017 1:40 pm
- Contact:
Re: Grammatical Rules Regarding "vā"
Bhante, thank you, invaluable!Dhammanando wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2018 8:41 pmIn their discussion of vā Pali grammarians drew a distinction between vikappana and sampiṇḍana, that is, a disjunctive ‘or’ and a conjunctive ‘and’.

I find it really surprising and kind of disappointing that such a important distinction is omitted in three grammars (European secondary literature) I consulted ... Maybe in Warder I overlooked it because I went not wholly through it but just use it for reference, flipping through it -- the part on "vā" didn't contain it however. Do you work with the ancient grammars, if I may ask. Would you see it as essential to turn towards them when wishing to get a sound grasp of the language? Should one regard the modern secondary literature perhaps just as serving by and large as introductions?
Thank you!
Mettā
"One should not consider the faults of others, nor their doing or not doing good or bad deeds. One should consider only whether one has done or not done good or bad deeds." -- The Buddha (Dhp.50)
Website: www.embracing-buddhism.jimdo.com
Website: www.embracing-buddhism.jimdo.com
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 10 guests