Chronology of the Commentaries

A forum for members who wish to develop a deeper understanding of the Pali Canon and associated Commentaries, which for discussion purposes are both treated as authoritative.

Moderator: Mahavihara moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
clw_uk
Posts: 4718
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:36 am

Chronology of the Commentaries

Post by clw_uk » Sat Mar 21, 2009 1:24 pm

Felt i should start new topic for this


Which is the oldest commentary?




:anjali:
Unbowed, Unbent, Unbroken

User avatar
Dhammanando
Posts: 3610
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 10:44 pm
Location: Ban Sri Pradu Cremation Ground, Phrao District, Chiangmai

Re: More Commentaries

Post by Dhammanando » Sat Mar 21, 2009 3:47 pm

Hi Craig,
clw_uk wrote:Which is the oldest commentary?
The earliest commentary-like works would be the commentarial content in the Tipiṭaka itself. For example:

• The definitions of terms in the Vinaya Piṭaka.
• The various suttas in which disciples like Sāriputta and Mahākaccāyana expound at length what the Buddha had expounded in brief.
• The Niddesa of the Khuddaka Nikāya (a commentary to two sections of the Suttanipāta). And perhaps also the Paṭisambhidāmagga.

On the other hand, taking "commentary" in the narrow sense of atthakathā, the oldest extant ones are those of Buddhaghosa, closely followed by those of Dhammapāla. The oldest we know of, but which are no longer extant are the Sinhalese texts from which Buddhaghosa was working — the Mahā-atthakathā, the Mahāpaccarī, and the Kuruṇḍī.

Best wishes,
Dhammanando Bhikkhu

User avatar
clw_uk
Posts: 4718
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:36 am

Re: More Commentaries

Post by clw_uk » Sat Mar 21, 2009 4:24 pm

Thank you Bhante



:anjali:
Unbowed, Unbent, Unbroken

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests