Hi
Forgive me if this is in the wrong place. I have been working my way through the Digha Nikaya and have come across something that has got me rather upset. As a gay man, I came to Buddhism for it's welcoming friendly, humanistic approach, imagine my dismay reading the cakkavatti sutta only to read homosexuality condemned. In the translation I'm reading its referred to homosxuality in other translations it's sexual deviant. Very sad.
homosexuality
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 7:10 pm
- Location: Belfast, Northern Ireland
- DNS
- Site Admin
- Posts: 17192
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:15 am
- Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, Estados Unidos de América
- Contact:
Re: homosexuality
Can you provide the quote and link to the translation you were reading?
- DNS
- Site Admin
- Posts: 17192
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:15 am
- Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, Estados Unidos de América
- Contact:
Re: homosexuality
I think Theravada is one of the most accepting / tolerant Buddhist schools toward homosexuality. For example, in some Mahayana schools or sutras, certain sex acts are prohibited, which effectively prohibit homosexuality.
-
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:42 am
Re: homosexuality
All activity in samsara can be understood as unskillful, relatively speaking. In many respects, even heterosexuality can be considered unskillful behavior, as it also involves craving and is a hindrance to higher states, much less nibbana.gingercatni wrote: ↑Wed Oct 03, 2018 9:19 pm Hi
Forgive me if this is in the wrong place. I have been working my way through the Digha Nikaya and have come across something that has got me rather upset. As a gay man, I came to Buddhism for it's welcoming friendly, humanistic approach, imagine my dismay reading the cakkavatti sutta only to read homosexuality condemned. In the translation I'm reading its referred to homosxuality in other translations it's sexual deviant. Very sad.
- JamesTheGiant
- Posts: 2147
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2015 8:41 am
- Location: New Zealand
Re: homosexuality
There is no reference to homosexuality in that sutta.
Rhys David translates the part you are offended by as
Homosexuality is not perverted, or wrong thought. It occurs in many animal species. So whatever the Buddha was talking about, it wasn't homosexuality.
Maybe it was Scat, or Water-play, or snuff porn or something.
Rhys David translates the part you are offended by as
And Sujato translates it asthree things grew apace: incest, wanton greed, and perverted lust."
.three things became widespread: illicit desire, immoral greed, and wrong thoughts
Homosexuality is not perverted, or wrong thought. It occurs in many animal species. So whatever the Buddha was talking about, it wasn't homosexuality.
Maybe it was Scat, or Water-play, or snuff porn or something.
Last edited by JamesTheGiant on Thu Oct 04, 2018 1:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
- cappuccino
- Posts: 12879
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 1:45 am
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 1783
- Joined: Thu May 12, 2016 5:29 pm
- Location: United States
Re: homosexuality
I think James answered your question. just a mistranslation. homosexuality is no less moral than heterosexuality.
"Do not have blind faith, but also no blind criticism" - the 14th Dalai Lama
"The Blessed One has set in motion the unexcelled Wheel of Dhamma that cannot be stopped by brahmins, devas, Maras, Brahmas or anyone in the cosmos." -Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta
"The Blessed One has set in motion the unexcelled Wheel of Dhamma that cannot be stopped by brahmins, devas, Maras, Brahmas or anyone in the cosmos." -Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta
Re: homosexuality
Hi GC. It appears this matter cannot even be regarded as a "mistranslation" because "homosexuality" is completely unrelated to the very broad Pali word found in this sutta. I have thoroughly discussed this sutta matter before; somewhere. The "homosexuality" inference is certainly a baseless interpretation held by certain sects. Its actually from what are called the "Commentaries". You can search the following link. Regardsgingercatni wrote: ↑Wed Oct 03, 2018 9:19 pmIn the translation I'm reading its referred to homosxuality in other translations it's sexual deviant.
The Commentary here explains
“abnormal lust” as incest, “excessive greed” or “neurotic desire,” as unbridled materialism and
consumerism, and “deviant conduct” as homosexuality (DA 3:853). [5.1; §17.5 n]
According to the Dīgha Commentary, here “abnormal lust” (adhamma,raga) refers to incest, that is, “lust between mother and mother’s sister and father’s sister and maternal uncle’s wife and other such improper situations” (mata matuccha pituccha matulanī ti adike ayutta-t,thane rago); “neurotic desire” (visama,lobha) refers to excessive greed by way of consuming things (paribhoga,yuttesu pi thanesu atibalava,lobho, in other words, excessive materialism and consumerism); and “deviant practices” (miccha,dhamma) refer to sexuality “between men and men, women with women.” (DA 3:853)
http://www.themindingcentre.org/dharmaf ... 6-piya.pdf
There is always an official executioner. If you try to take his place, It is like trying to be a master carpenter and cutting wood. If you try to cut wood like a master carpenter, you will only hurt your hand.
https://soundcloud.com/doodoot/paticcasamuppada
https://soundcloud.com/doodoot/anapanasati
https://soundcloud.com/doodoot/paticcasamuppada
https://soundcloud.com/doodoot/anapanasati
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 7:10 pm
- Location: Belfast, Northern Ireland
Re: homosexuality
Thanks for the link. I'm reading a physical printed version of the Digha Nikaya so I cannot provide links to the text I refer to. The translator of the version I'm reading may hopefully rephrase this section as rereading it, it seems out of sync with the flow of the sutta. Can I also say to anyone reading this thread, if you haven't already read the Digha Nikaya, it is certainly a group of sutta's well worth reading. However, your brain will be thoroughly excercised!DooDoot wrote: ↑Thu Oct 04, 2018 4:19 amHi GC. It appears this matter cannot even be regarded as a "mistranslation" because "homosexuality" is completely unrelated to the very broad Pali word found in this sutta. I have thoroughly discussed this sutta matter before; somewhere. The "homosexuality" inference is certainly a baseless interpretation held by certain sects. Its actually from what are called the "Commentaries". You can search the following link. Regardsgingercatni wrote: ↑Wed Oct 03, 2018 9:19 pmIn the translation I'm reading its referred to homosxuality in other translations it's sexual deviant.
The Commentary here explains
“abnormal lust” as incest, “excessive greed” or “neurotic desire,” as unbridled materialism and
consumerism, and “deviant conduct” as homosexuality (DA 3:853). [5.1; §17.5 n]
According to the Dīgha Commentary, here “abnormal lust” (adhamma,raga) refers to incest, that is, “lust between mother and mother’s sister and father’s sister and maternal uncle’s wife and other such improper situations” (mata matuccha pituccha matulanī ti adike ayutta-t,thane rago); “neurotic desire” (visama,lobha) refers to excessive greed by way of consuming things (paribhoga,yuttesu pi thanesu atibalava,lobho, in other words, excessive materialism and consumerism); and “deviant practices” (miccha,dhamma) refer to sexuality “between men and men, women with women.” (DA 3:853)
http://www.themindingcentre.org/dharmaf ... 6-piya.pdf
Re: homosexuality
The text is:gingercatni wrote: ↑Thu Oct 04, 2018 9:28 pmThanks for the link. I'm reading a physical printed version of the Digha Nikaya so I cannot provide links to the text I refer to.
None of the Pali words above mean or explicit refer to homosexuality. The following translation below, referring to "incest", is obviously also wrong.Pañcavassasatāyukesu, bhikkhave, manussesu tayo dhammā vepullamagamaṃsu—
Among the people who lived for five hundred years, three things became widespread:
adhammarāgo visamalobho micchādhammo.
illicit desire, immoral greed, and wrong thoughts.
https://suttacentral.net/dn26/en/sujato
Among humans of the latter span of life, brethren, three things grew apace: incest, wanton greed, and perverted lust.
https://suttacentral.net/dn26/en/tw-caf_rhysdavids
The Digha might be interesting but it will often bring up issues similar to the issue you have raised because many suttas in the Digha appear to have no equivalent in the rest of the suttas.gingercatni wrote: ↑Thu Oct 04, 2018 9:28 pmif you haven't already read the Digha Nikaya, it is certainly a group of sutta's well worth reading. However, your brain will be thoroughly excercised!
There is always an official executioner. If you try to take his place, It is like trying to be a master carpenter and cutting wood. If you try to cut wood like a master carpenter, you will only hurt your hand.
https://soundcloud.com/doodoot/paticcasamuppada
https://soundcloud.com/doodoot/anapanasati
https://soundcloud.com/doodoot/paticcasamuppada
https://soundcloud.com/doodoot/anapanasati
Re: homosexuality
I strongly doubt the Buddha would have approved of homosexuality unless you can point to some theravada texts that do?
- DNS
- Site Admin
- Posts: 17192
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:15 am
- Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, Estados Unidos de América
- Contact:
Re: homosexuality
I agree; I'm just mentioning that it could be the most accepting and tolerant; not necessarily approving of it. The Buddha didn't approve of homosexuality or heterosexuality; arguably you could say he was opposed to all sexual relations, however, realizing that being a monk isn't for everyone he laid out some guidelines for lay people and gay or straight wasn't discussed (except where it is implied when referring to husband and wife). Whereas, in other religions it is explicitly stated that homosexuality is an "abomination" not acceptable, etc.
Heterosexual couples have relations based on raga-craving; same with homosexual couples. I see no reason to assume one form of raga-craving is superior or inferior to another.
Re: homosexuality
The translations that I've found refer to 'sexual misconduct'. I'll leave it to others to describe this, but as I understand it the precept against sexual misconduct doesn't mention same sex relations.gingercatni wrote: ↑Wed Oct 03, 2018 9:19 pm Hi
Forgive me if this is in the wrong place. I have been working my way through the Digha Nikaya and have come across something that has got me rather upset. As a gay man, I came to Buddhism for it's welcoming friendly, humanistic approach, imagine my dismay reading the cakkavatti sutta only to read homosexuality condemned. In the translation I'm reading its referred to homosxuality in other translations it's sexual deviant. Very sad.
Sometimes people try to slip homosexuality into the definition of sexual misconduct, but this is usually people trying to justify their own prejudice.
As with Jesus, I don't think the Buddha devoted much time to discussing homosexuality. For some reason, bigots looking for justification often try to make out that they did. The Buddha taught love in abundance, I don't think his teachings are homophobic.
"If only it were all so simple! If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?"
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Re: homosexuality
There's nothing wrong with homosexuality. Unless one wants to have their own child--and even then, there's plenty of children up for adoption. It's no more perverted than heterosexuality. If the species were facing extinction, we might encourage heterosexuality more. But there's plenty of people. Live and let live and know that the fires of passion and lust take many forms.
becoming aware!
Re: homosexuality
I thought Buddha approved of heterosexuality for lay people . The five precept didn't against intimacy between husband and wife .DNS wrote: ↑Fri Oct 05, 2018 2:08 amI agree; I'm just mentioning that it could be the most accepting and tolerant; not necessarily approving of it. The Buddha didn't approve of homosexuality or heterosexuality; arguably you could say he was opposed to all sexual relations, however, realizing that being a monk isn't for everyone he laid out some guidelines for lay people and gay or straight wasn't discussed (except where it is implied when referring to husband and wife). Whereas, in other religions it is explicitly stated that homosexuality is an "abomination" not acceptable, etc.
Heterosexual couples have relations based on raga-craving; same with homosexual couples. I see no reason to assume one form of raga-craving is superior or inferior to another.
You always gain by giving