The Visuddhi Magga and Abhidhamma may not have been taught by the Buddha! (Sama dengan Bahasa)

Discussion of Abhidhamma and related Commentaries

Moderator: Mahavihara moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
Dhammarakkhito
Posts: 1115
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:31 am
Contact:

The Visuddhi Magga and Abhidhamma may not have been taught by the Buddha! (Sama dengan Bahasa)

Post by Dhammarakkhito » Mon Jan 15, 2018 9:33 am

"Just as the ocean has a single taste — that of salt — in the same way, this Dhamma-Vinaya has a single taste: that of release."
— Ud 5.5

https://www.facebook.com/noblebuddhadha ... 34/?type=3

http://seeingthroughthenet.net/
https://sites.google.com/site/santipada ... allytaught

User avatar
retrofuturist
Site Admin
Posts: 20149
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: The Visuddhi Magga and Abhidhamma may not have been taught by the Buddha! (Sama dengan Bahasa)

Post by retrofuturist » Mon Jan 15, 2018 9:18 pm

Greetings,

Internally, the creation of the Abhdhamma Pitaka is unattributed to any author. Attribution for the creation of the Abhidhamma teaching was made in subsequent commentary.

The Visuddhimagga was either authored and/or compiled by ven. Buddhaghosa. Given this elder lived roughly one millennium after the Buddha, it's kind of obvious it wasn't taught by the Buddha. I've never heard it suggested that it was...

Metta,
Paul. :)
"Do not force others, including children, by any means whatsoever, to adopt your views, whether by authority, threat, money, propaganda, or even education." - Ven. Thich Nhat Hanh

"The uprooting of identity is seen by the noble ones as pleasurable; but this contradicts what the whole world sees." (Snp 3.12)

"One discerns wrong view as wrong view, and right view as right view. This is one's right view." (MN 117)

SarathW
Posts: 10329
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:49 am

Re: The Visuddhi Magga and Abhidhamma may not have been taught by the Buddha! (Sama dengan Bahasa)

Post by SarathW » Mon Jan 15, 2018 9:35 pm

The real question is whether the teaching of Abhidhamma and Visuddhi Magga contain the Buddha's teaching.
My understanding is they both contain Buddha's teaching. (say 99%)
This is no difference to Sutta. Even Sutta does not have 100% representation of what Buddha taught.
I think those monks who discourage their student to study Abhidhamma and Visuddhi Magga are irresponsible.
“As the lamp consumes oil, the path realises Nibbana”

User avatar
retrofuturist
Site Admin
Posts: 20149
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: The Visuddhi Magga and Abhidhamma may not have been taught by the Buddha! (Sama dengan Bahasa)

Post by retrofuturist » Mon Jan 15, 2018 9:44 pm

Greetings Sarath,
SarathW wrote:
Mon Jan 15, 2018 9:35 pm
My understanding is they both contain Buddha's teaching. (say 99%)
Do you mean that 99% of what is said in these sources was literally said by the Buddha, and that the elders compiled additional content from the Blessed One which had been omitted from the suttas, for whatever reason?

Or something else?

Just trying to work out exactly what you're claiming here...

Metta,
Paul. :)
"Do not force others, including children, by any means whatsoever, to adopt your views, whether by authority, threat, money, propaganda, or even education." - Ven. Thich Nhat Hanh

"The uprooting of identity is seen by the noble ones as pleasurable; but this contradicts what the whole world sees." (Snp 3.12)

"One discerns wrong view as wrong view, and right view as right view. This is one's right view." (MN 117)

SarathW
Posts: 10329
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:49 am

Re: The Visuddhi Magga and Abhidhamma may not have been taught by the Buddha! (Sama dengan Bahasa)

Post by SarathW » Mon Jan 15, 2018 11:01 pm

retrofuturist wrote:
Mon Jan 15, 2018 9:44 pm
Greetings Sarath,
SarathW wrote:
Mon Jan 15, 2018 9:35 pm
My understanding is they both contain Buddha's teaching. (say 99%)
Do you mean that 99% of what is said in these sources was literally said by the Buddha, and that the elders compiled additional content from the Blessed One which had been omitted from the suttas, for whatever reason?

Or something else?

Just trying to work out exactly what you're claiming here...

Metta,
Paul. :)
No.
What I am saying is what those documents contains are Buddha's teaching but may be compiled in a different way.
Even the Suttas are not what literally said by the Buddha.
Sutta are also a tabulation or a compilation.
“As the lamp consumes oil, the path realises Nibbana”

paul
Posts: 1309
Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 11:27 pm
Location: Vietnam

Re: The Visuddhi Magga and Abhidhamma may not have been taught by the Buddha! (Sama dengan Bahasa)

Post by paul » Tue Jan 16, 2018 12:22 am

SarathW wrote:
Mon Jan 15, 2018 11:01 pm
:goodpost:
What I am saying is what those documents contains are Buddha's teaching but may be compiled in a different way.
Even the Suttas are not what literally said by the Buddha.
Sutta are also a tabulation or a compilation.
An example of being compiled differently and expanded on is dispassion, which for example in the suttas is referred to simply as:

"There is the case where a monk develops mindfulness as a factor for awakening dependent on seclusion, dependent on dispassion, dependent on cessation, resulting in relinquishment". ---MN 118.

Whereas in the Visuddhimagga it is expanded on in the nine insight knowledges following contemplation of impermanence and dissolution.---Vism XXI.

SarathW
Posts: 10329
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:49 am

Re: The Visuddhi Magga and Abhidhamma may not have been taught by the Buddha! (Sama dengan Bahasa)

Post by SarathW » Tue Jan 16, 2018 1:11 am

paul wrote:
Tue Jan 16, 2018 12:22 am
SarathW wrote:
Mon Jan 15, 2018 11:01 pm
:goodpost:
What I am saying is what those documents contains are Buddha's teaching but may be compiled in a different way.
Even the Suttas are not what literally said by the Buddha.
Sutta are also a tabulation or a compilation.
An example of being compiled differently and expanded on is dispassion, which for example in the suttas is referred to simply as:

"There is the case where a monk develops mindfulness as a factor for awakening dependent on seclusion, dependent on dispassion, dependent on cessation, resulting in relinquishment". ---MN 118.

Whereas in the Visuddhimagga it is expanded on in the nine insight knowledges following contemplation of impermanence and dissolution.---Vism XXI.
Agree.
Even this expansion is find in Sutta somewhere.
“As the lamp consumes oil, the path realises Nibbana”

User avatar
Zom
Posts: 2226
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 6:38 pm
Location: Russia, Saint-Petersburg
Contact:

Re: The Visuddhi Magga and Abhidhamma may not have been taught by the Buddha! (Sama dengan Bahasa)

Post by Zom » Tue Jan 16, 2018 1:12 pm

Whereas in the Visuddhimagga it is expanded on in the nine insight knowledges
Nine insight knowledges is an example of a thing Buddha never taught. And many of such things are in there (Visuddhimagga, etc). This is called "Tharavada sloppiness" 8-)

Saengnapha
Posts: 1350
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 10:17 am

Re: The Visuddhi Magga and Abhidhamma may not have been taught by the Buddha! (Sama dengan Bahasa)

Post by Saengnapha » Wed Jan 17, 2018 5:24 am

Zom wrote:
Tue Jan 16, 2018 1:12 pm
Whereas in the Visuddhimagga it is expanded on in the nine insight knowledges
Nine insight knowledges is an example of a thing Buddha never taught. And many of such things are in there (Visuddhimagga, etc). This is called "Tharavada sloppiness" 8-)
Many Sri Lankan monks, scholars, and teachers are disavowing Abhidhamma and Visuddhimagga.

pt1
Posts: 417
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 2:30 am

Re: The Visuddhi Magga and Abhidhamma may not have been taught by the Buddha! (Sama dengan Bahasa)

Post by pt1 » Thu Jan 18, 2018 7:07 am

The Venerable in the video, V.Vimalaramsi, is known for teaching "soft jhanas", which is different to how jhanas are presented in the Visuddhimagga.

So, it seems only natural that he would speak against Visuddhimagga, since the underlying assumption seems to be that both cannot be right (which is also why those who prefer the more traditional approach would then speak against V.Vimalaramsi's interpretations).

Having conversed with the Venerable online many years ago, I understand he did study the more traditional approaches in Mynamar, but he didn't find them to work for him for whatever reason, so he decided to develop his own approach to studying and mediation that he then later started to teach.

Of course, the claim that his teaching agrees with what the Buddha taught while some other teachings do not (e.g. Visuddhimagga or Abhidhamma) is nothing new compared to pretty much any other modern teacher out there.

As for whether Vsm and abhidhamma were taught by the Buddha or not - I was once given advice that the only way to really find out is to develop wisdom because "one who sees Dhamma sees the Buddha" (SN 22.87), and then you will know for yourself whether a particular text or teacher truly teaches in conformity with the Buddhadhamma, instead of relying on conjecture and spreading hearsay.

Note to moderators: I am surprised to see this topic in the abhidhamma forum and have to admit it feels a bit like being back on e-sangha where you couldn't study what you were interested in without getting harassed by people telling you that you are basically an idiot because you have an interest in something that they think is not the legitimate teaching of the day. I thought the whole point of creating Dhamma Wheel 10 years ago was to have a place where Theravadins of all stripes would have a home that's free of harassment?

That said, I'm sure people who prefer to frequent Modern Interpretations forum feel the same way when someone starts preaching from the traditional standpoint, but isn't that why there are moderators here and different subforums to organise the threads accordingly? Hence, Modern Interpretations sub forum for those that value modern interpretations, an abdhidhamma subforum for those that value abhidhamma, and so on.

User avatar
robertk
Posts: 2930
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 2:08 am

Re: The Visuddhi Magga and Abhidhamma may not have been taught by the Buddha! (Sama dengan Bahasa)

Post by robertk » Thu Jan 18, 2018 7:15 am

Note to moderators: I am surprised to see this topic in the abhidhamma forum
If it continues to generate interest and debate I will move it to the Great Abhidhamma Pitaka authenticity debate
viewtopic.php?f=26&t=2174&p=29446&hilit ... eat#p29446

User avatar
Dhammarakkhito
Posts: 1115
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:31 am
Contact:

Re: The Visuddhi Magga and Abhidhamma may not have been taught by the Buddha! (Sama dengan Bahasa)

Post by Dhammarakkhito » Thu Jan 18, 2018 11:18 am

i didnt read the guidelines before i posted. :stirthepot: well, i thought it might produce some arguments on why abhidhamma could be authentic, which i would be interested in. no offense :guns:
"Just as the ocean has a single taste — that of salt — in the same way, this Dhamma-Vinaya has a single taste: that of release."
— Ud 5.5

https://www.facebook.com/noblebuddhadha ... 34/?type=3

http://seeingthroughthenet.net/
https://sites.google.com/site/santipada ... allytaught

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests