Hindu Practice Vs Buddhist Practice

Exploring Theravāda's connections to other paths. What can we learn from other traditions, religions and philosophies?
User avatar
Coëmgenu
Posts: 1715
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 10:55 pm
Location: Whitby, Canada

Re: Hindu Practice Vs Buddhist Practice

Post by Coëmgenu » Fri Apr 06, 2018 7:20 pm

Saengnapha wrote:
Thu Apr 05, 2018 3:16 am
cappuccino wrote:
Wed Apr 04, 2018 8:23 pm
Saengnapha wrote:
Wed Apr 04, 2018 8:37 am
it is often based on pre-conceived ideas about what we think is an enlightened man and what he/she should look and act like.
only a follower of a Buddha can be enlightened,
if by enlightened you mean Nirvana

if you don't mean Nirvana,
you're speaking of the formless jhanas
If you are honest with yourself, the only things you know of the historical Buddha are your images which you have put together from books and conversations with others. None of it is real, only fabrications of conditioned thinking. Letting go of these images is the practice, no matter what you think or feel.
On the other hand, it's a pretty common religious claim to say "mine" is demonstrable and provable through experiential verification. These "images" : the momentary dhamma, formless jhanas- for many people, at least as far as their words indicate their internal realities, these images are as real as their feet, as opposed to being book-learned theories.
世尊在靈山會上拈華示眾眾皆默然唯迦葉破顏微笑世尊云
The Lord dwelt at the Vulture Peak with the assembly and plucked a flower as a teaching. The myriad totality were silent, save for Kāśyapa, whose face cracked in a faint smile. The Lord spoke.

吾有正法眼藏涅槃妙心實相無相微妙法門不立文字教外別傳付囑摩訶迦葉。
I have the treasure of the true dharma eye, I have nirvāṇa as wondrous citta, I know signless dharmatā, the subtle dharma-gate, which is not standing on written word, which is external to scriptures, which is a special dispensation, which is entrusted to Mahākāśyapa.

Saengnapha
Posts: 1188
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 10:17 am

Re: Hindu Practice Vs Buddhist Practice

Post by Saengnapha » Sat Apr 07, 2018 4:08 am

Coëmgenu wrote:
Fri Apr 06, 2018 7:20 pm
Saengnapha wrote:
Thu Apr 05, 2018 3:16 am
cappuccino wrote:
Wed Apr 04, 2018 8:23 pm


only a follower of a Buddha can be enlightened,
if by enlightened you mean Nirvana

if you don't mean Nirvana,
you're speaking of the formless jhanas
If you are honest with yourself, the only things you know of the historical Buddha are your images which you have put together from books and conversations with others. None of it is real, only fabrications of conditioned thinking. Letting go of these images is the practice, no matter what you think or feel.
On the other hand, it's a pretty common religious claim to say "mine" is demonstrable and provable through experiential verification. These "images" : the momentary dhamma, formless jhanas- for many people, at least as far as their words indicate their internal realities, these images are as real as their feet, as opposed to being book-learned theories.
Yes, but they don't produce nibbana and the self-structure remains. Jhanas temporarily suspend some mind-activities but this is not what the great masters meant by realization.

jmccoy
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun May 28, 2017 6:18 pm

Re: Hindu Practice Vs Buddhist Practice

Post by jmccoy » Sat May 05, 2018 10:11 am

I apologize for all comments I have been made on this forum and especially by me in particularly this specific thread (probably not in any other).
:goodpost:

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests