From the perspective of the philosophical liguistic system applied, yes. Why? Because althought the expression is conventionally correct from its perspective the object arising from it is not true from its own side because it exists only dependent on conceptual imputation.dhammacoustic wrote:"water boils at 212°F under atmospheric pressure"All phenomena that can be objects of communication (objects expressed and means of expression) can be objects of communication only because they are objects of consciousness and as objects they exist only dependent on conceptual imputation, i.e. they lack truth.
This (formal expression) lacks truth?
What is the object here?
The object is the idea as meaning entity arising upon seeing a concatenation of signs/forms which looks like that: "water boils at 212°F under atmospheric pressure".
