mikenz66 wrote:Jack wrote:Thanks for the quotes about rebirth. They were informative. But, I was looking for a sutta reference that specifically mentioned belief in rebirth as part of the 8-Fold Path.
The Sutta that Kirk and I have now both quoted
is about the 8-fold path:
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"Now what, monks, is noble right concentration with its supports & requisite conditions? Any singleness of mind equipped with these seven factors — right view, right resolve, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, & right mindfulness — is called noble right concentration with its supports & requisite conditions.
Mike
Thanks for the references. I learned something. Rebirth is certainly part of Right View according to this sutta.
I also believe that a contrary understanding is defined by other suttas. MN 63 which I quoted above, for instance, on getting the poison out now instead of wasting time in idle conversation about the past and future. The last part of the Kalama Sutta for another where the Buddha says if “If there is an after-world (paraloka) and there are fruits of good and bad actions (kamma-phala), he or she can expect to be reborn in a heaven world (sagga), in a state of bliss. If there is no after-world and no fruits of good and bad actions, the person free from greed, hatred, and delusion will still be happy here and now.” So, who cares. (I added this last sentence.) MN2, the Sabbasava Sutta, says speculation on the past and future is unfit for attention Dhammapada Verses 19 and 20 is also useful. There is another sutta which I can’t find that specifically lists all the topics which are a waste of time to discuss. I’m pretty sure that what happens after death is on these topics to be avoided. If anyone knows what sutta this is, please let me know.
Here is a reference from the Mahàtanhàsankhaya Sutta that is relevant..
“Bhikkhus, knowing and seeing in this way, would you say: ‘The Teacher is respected by us. We speak as we do out of respect for the Teacher’?”
“No, bhante.
“Do you speak only of what you have known, seen, and understood for yourselves?”
“Yes, bhante.”
“Good, bhikkhus. So you have been guided by me with this dhamma, which is directly visible (sandiññhika), timeless (akàlika), verifiable (ehipassika), leading onwards (opaneyyika), to be individually experienced by the wise (paccattaü veditabbo vinnuhi). For it was with reference to this that it has been said: ‘Bhikkhus, this dhamma is directly visible, timeless, verifiable, leading onwards, to be individually experienced by the wise.”
I believe Buddhism is a collection of techniques to alleviate suffering. When concepts are mentioned as teachings to reduce suffering (the only thing he said he was teaching) they are guidelines for practice. An example is the Four Noble Truths. The Buddha mentioned a lot of other things which I don’t believe are to reduce suffering and stress and thus not part of this teaching. It's like going to a music teacher who intersperses his teaching with his view of the world, his politics, ghosts he believes in, etc., which has nothing to do with his teaching how to play an instrument.Others have different views on this.
jack