I know, but that seems to me to be the logical conclusion from your previous post.tiltbillings wrote:Not taught in the Pali suttas.Sherab wrote:
So there is a "pure" realm where undefiled conditioning drives its existence and where "pure" beings abide and there is the "impure" realm driven by defiled conditionings where we the "impure" beings abide?
Luminious mind
Re: Luminious mind
- jcsuperstar
- Posts: 1915
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 5:15 am
- Location: alaska
- Contact:
Re: Luminious mind
Sherab wrote:I know, but that seems to me to be the logical conclusion from your previous post.tiltbillings wrote:Not taught in the Pali suttas.Sherab wrote:
So there is a "pure" realm where undefiled conditioning drives its existence and where "pure" beings abide and there is the "impure" realm driven by defiled conditionings where we the "impure" beings abide?
สัพเพ สัตตา สุขีตา โหนตุ
the mountain may be heavy in and of itself, but if you're not trying to carry it it's not heavy to you- Ajaan Suwat
the mountain may be heavy in and of itself, but if you're not trying to carry it it's not heavy to you- Ajaan Suwat
- tiltbillings
- Posts: 23046
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am
Re: Luminious mind
Interesting, I would say just the opposite, at least. I kind of wonder if you are making an unwarranted jump somewhere along the line. Because there is no separate realms of the unconditioned as opposed to the conditioned, that we can free ourselves from the conditioning of greed, hatred, and delusion.Sherab wrote:I know, but that seems to me to be the logical conclusion from your previous post.tiltbillings wrote:Not taught in the Pali suttas.Sherab wrote:
So there is a "pure" realm where undefiled conditioning drives its existence and where "pure" beings abide and there is the "impure" realm driven by defiled conditionings where we the "impure" beings abide?
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
Re: Luminious mind
From Tiltbillings previous post:jcsuperstar wrote:Sherab wrote:
I know, but that seems to me to be the logical conclusion from your previous post.
"The conditioning that matters, that chain of conditioning which keeps us bound to samsara has stopped, but the conditions of life still continue."
What else could be concluded from the above?
Re: Luminious mind
Where are you getting this "realm" business from?
For a Buddha, they deal with the same stuff everyone else does, but they are free from clinging, and so free from craving and aversion, no longer influenced by them. An awakened person interacts with the same world, but without pushing or pulling, or stress. That's it.
For a Buddha, they deal with the same stuff everyone else does, but they are free from clinging, and so free from craving and aversion, no longer influenced by them. An awakened person interacts with the same world, but without pushing or pulling, or stress. That's it.
- tiltbillings
- Posts: 23046
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am
Re: Luminious mind
Well, the awakened one is no longer bound by the conditioning of greed, hatred, and delusion. That does not suggest some other pure realm. After all the Buddha finds himself no less the world, as my sutta quotation shows, than are we.Sherab wrote:From Tiltbillings previous post:jcsuperstar wrote:Sherab wrote:
I know, but that seems to me to be the logical conclusion from your previous post.
"The conditioning that matters, that chain of conditioning which keeps us bound to samsara has stopped, but the conditions of life still continue."
What else could be concluded from the above?
I certainly do not follow your jump here. You will need to spell it out for. Unquestionably I am stuck on stupid here.
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
- tiltbillings
- Posts: 23046
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am
Re: Luminious mind
I am retiring to bed to review some past tense Irish verbs and to lay in the lap of Nyx, to dream dreams. So, I'll respond to whatever when I acheive awakening in this AM.
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
Re: Luminious mind
You are right. I did make a jump.tiltbillings wrote:Interesting, I would say just the opposite, at least. I kind of wonder if you are making an unwarranted jump somewhere along the line. Because there is no separate realms of the unconditioned as opposed to the conditioned, that we can free ourselves from the conditioning of greed, hatred, and delusion.
The jump is that the realm that sentient beings ("impure" beings) inhabit are "created" by their collective karma (collective defiled conditionings?). "Pure" beings therefore do not share the same collective karma to inhabit in the same realm as the "impure" beings. Since you said "the conditions for life still continue", I presume that "pure" beings should logically be abiding in a different realm that I labelled as "pure" realm. Of course, "pure" beings if they so wish, could choose to be in the "impure" realm of "impure" beings. Does this make sense to you?
-
- Posts: 1614
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:21 am
- Location: By the River Thames near London.
Re: Luminious mind
Do you Sherab have direct and personal knowledge that these realms actually exist ?
The going for refuge is the door of entrance to the teachings of the Buddha.
Bhikku Bodhi.
Bhikku Bodhi.
Re: Luminious mind
Huh? I was merely making a conclusion based on what Tiltbillings posted. If the conclusion is right, then Tiltbillings' post is right. If the conclusion is wrong, then Tiltbillings' post is wrong.Sanghamitta wrote:Do you Sherab have direct and personal knowledge that these realms actually exist ?
-
- Posts: 1614
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:21 am
- Location: By the River Thames near London.
Re: Luminious mind
It seems to me that my question is clear and straightforward.
The going for refuge is the door of entrance to the teachings of the Buddha.
Bhikku Bodhi.
Bhikku Bodhi.
- tiltbillings
- Posts: 23046
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:25 am
Re: Luminious mind
"Collective karma" is kind of a Mahayana thing, it seems. Collective karma was not taught in the suttas and "realm" here is at best a figure of speech. And just to ask, are you implying the buddha-field thing here?Sherab wrote:You are right. I did make a jump.tiltbillings wrote:Interesting, I would say just the opposite, at least. I kind of wonder if you are making an unwarranted jump somewhere along the line. Because there is no separate realms of the unconditioned as opposed to the conditioned, that we can free ourselves from the conditioning of greed, hatred, and delusion.
The jump is that the realm that sentient beings ("impure" beings) inhabit are "created" by their collective karma (collective defiled conditionings?). "Pure" beings therefore do not share the same collective karma to inhabit in the same realm as the "impure" beings. Since you said "the conditions for life still continue", I presume that "pure" beings should logically be abiding in a different realm that I labelled as "pure" realm. Of course, "pure" beings if they so wish, could choose to be in the "impure" realm of "impure" beings. Does this make sense to you?
And you have totally missed my point, it seems.
>> Do you see a man wise [enlightened/ariya] in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him.<< -- Proverbs 26:12
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
This being is bound to samsara, kamma is his means for going beyond. -- SN I, 38.
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?” HPatDH p.723
Re: Luminious mind
Are you asking in reference to an arahant who is still alive or who has died his last death? An arahant who is still alive still experiences some of the PS chain. For example, contact still leads to feeling. Food will still taste good or bad or neither good nor bad. But feeling will no longer lead to craving. For example, the arahant will neither crave good tasting food nor resist bad tasting food.Sherab wrote:When ignorance disappear, sankhara disappear; when sankhara disappear, vinnana disappear as so on. In other words, the whole PS chain disappear. If the whole PS chain disappear, what have we got left?
To put it another way, there is no separate realm. An arahant lives in the same world as the rest of us. His senses still function, he still eats, and sleeps, and thinks, and eventually he dies.
An arahant continues to live in this impure realm as a result of past karma. Some past karma resulted in him being born. Once born, one grows, older, sicker, and eventually dies. Arahantship does not change this. Once the arahant eventually dies, however, there is no condition for him to be born again.The jump is that the realm that sentient beings ("impure" beings) inhabit are "created" by their ... karma. "Pure" beings therefore do not share the same collective karma to inhabit in the same realm as the "impure" beings.
Now if you are asking about an arahant after death... well the Buddha said quite explicitly that this is something beyond talking about.
- Peter
Be heedful and you will accomplish your goal.
Be heedful and you will accomplish your goal.
Re: Luminious mind
How different is this, really, from Ch’an/Zen “original mind”? Don’t throw rotten fruit at me, peeps – it just seems glaringly evident. You don’t have to read far in any Ch’an text to see a similar concept described in similar language...almost to the letter, in fact, down to the sharpness of mind during satori, the freedom from defilements, equanimity towards formations, etc...dhamma follower wrote: IMHU, the luminous mind is the natural quality of the mind to know things as they are before defilements come in. This is also the mind of an arahant. An ordinary person can also experience this luminous mind when he attains the stage of equanimity toward all formations. The minds is extremely sharp, is aware of the minutest details and totally equanimous. It has the quality of being luminous but there's no light, it's simply the luminosity of wisdom or fredom from defilements.
Yet Mayahana asserts that the Buddha's mind is intrinsically within us -- some schools make a point of categorically rejecting the "otherness" you mention. That even applies to the most quasi-theistic branches, e.g. Pure Land.tiltbillings wrote:We could go the Mahayana route and essentially deify the Buddha, stating his mind utterly other than ours, which the Mahayana takes to docetic heights. That is not necessarily the picture we get in the suttas. There is no subtle truly true reality. For the Buddha, or any awakened individual, it is the same stuff we all deal with.
[/digression]
Re: Luminious mind
I don't think anyone would disagree with the idea that all minds have the potential for awakening, which I understand to be the gist of the Original Mind and Buddha Nature stuff, but I think the problem is when all sorts of other weird stuff get added into that. I'm not talking about anyone in particular, but it happens.