Goodnight.Aloka wrote:OK - well I noticed your posts in a topic on this website in support of Aro g'Ter and mentioning Malcome have been quoted there in the 'Dharma Free For All.'gendun wrote: I have never posted on Dharma Wheel..ever.
Goodnight
the great rebirth debate
Re: the great rebirth debate
Gendun P. Brownlow.
Karma Kagyu student.
Karma Kagyu student.
Re: the great rebirth debate
Comforter? ... Comforter? It would be much less stressful if there was only one life and we would be ipso facto Arhants in that matter.Aloka wrote:Yes, I can understand how people need rebirth as a kind of morality system and comforter - and that's fine.
Quite the opposite. It was the FEAR of rebirth that motivated Prince Siddhartha to seek Nibbana. Most of dukkha is not a psychological "you didn't get what you craved". The problem with craving is that it leads to more rebirth which means that one has to work, age, get sick, experience excruciating pain potentially endless amount of time until Nibbana and in some lifeforms the pain is trillions times greater than in this human life.
This time we have it lucky. We weren't born as starving kid in Africa... But with rebirth there is no guarantee unless one becomes an Aryan.
Re: the great rebirth debate
Many would see the whole religious thing as a comforterAlex123 wrote:Comforter? ... Comforter? It would be much less stressful if there was only one life and we would be ipso facto Arhants in that matter.Aloka wrote:Yes, I can understand how people need rebirth as a kind of morality system and comforter - and that's fine.
See here http://dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.php?f= ... 88&start=0Most of dukkha is not a psychological
Re: the great rebirth debate
Possibly so. Which begs the question what brings those people to a Buddhist website.
Gendun P. Brownlow.
Karma Kagyu student.
Karma Kagyu student.
Re: the great rebirth debate
The first noble truth here and now?gendun wrote:Possibly so. Which begs the question what brings those people to a Buddhist website.
Re: the great rebirth debate
The first noble truth in isolation is a counsel of despair.
Take all four or leave it alone.
Take all four or leave it alone.
Gendun P. Brownlow.
Karma Kagyu student.
Karma Kagyu student.
Re: the great rebirth debate
Lol, I hope that's not a reference to me because of my remark about rebirth being a comforter for (some) people !gendun wrote:Possibly so. Which begs the question what brings those people to a Buddhist website.
One could speculate endlessly about what brings other people to a Buddhist website - and perhaps for some of us its to argue and attempt to dominate others with our own views.
This is an excellent talk from Ajahn Sumedho which I went to myself :
"Who need Enlightenment when I have my opinions?"'
http://forestsanghapublications.org/viewTalk.php?id=639
Last edited by Aloka on Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: the great rebirth debate
It was a response to Mr Man's statement that many people see all religious activity as a comforting mechanism..which probably true. But such people will find little comfort on offer at a cheap price in Buddhism.
Of course there will always be those particularly if they are "born Buddhists" who will take comfort in a sentimental attachment to the more picturesque aspects of Buddhism.
But most converts will quickly move through that phase or leave.
The arrival of internet Buddhism may enable some to hang around the periphery for a long time.
But their first retreat will confront them with the reality of living the Dharma.
Of course there will always be those particularly if they are "born Buddhists" who will take comfort in a sentimental attachment to the more picturesque aspects of Buddhism.
But most converts will quickly move through that phase or leave.
The arrival of internet Buddhism may enable some to hang around the periphery for a long time.
But their first retreat will confront them with the reality of living the Dharma.
Gendun P. Brownlow.
Karma Kagyu student.
Karma Kagyu student.
Re: the great rebirth debate
Which was in response to Alex123 "It would be much less stressful if there was only one life".gendun wrote:It was a response to Mr Man's statement that many people see all religious activity as a comforting mechanism..which probably true. But such people will find little comfort on offer at a cheap price in Buddhism.
Suffering is here and now. We do not need a belief in rebirth to experience the first noble truth. Dukkha is egalitarian.
Re: the great rebirth debate
According to orthodox teaching, this "here-and-now" will endlessly occur until parinibbana, not until first and last death (according to one-life only belief).Mr Man wrote:Which was in response to Alex123 "It would be much less stressful if there was only one life".gendun wrote:It was a response to Mr Man's statement that many people see all religious activity as a comforting mechanism..which probably true. But such people will find little comfort on offer at a cheap price in Buddhism.
Suffering is here and now. We do not need a belief in rebirth to experience the first noble truth. Dukkha is egalitarian.
I notice that trying to meditate (samatha or vipassana) often adds more dukkha, not less. There are quicker ways to feel pleasure or peace than that.
Also trying to act "right" adds additional stress, and problems. What for if death is parinibbana anyways? Why complicate life even more?
If "here-and-now" will occur after the death of this body, then extra discomfort in meditation or following Dhamma to stop more dukkha after death of this body is justified. No pain, no gain.
But if parinibbana is going to occur anyways, why bother with extra stress?
- Jerrod Lopes
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:11 am
Re: the great rebirth debate
Sounds very much nihilistic. If you're a nihilist, the extra 'stress' would be a waste of time. If your meditation practice is one of looking for pleasure, it's a waste of time. I would dearly love to know what ways there are to find as deep and sincere and lasting a peace as meditation offers, but at a faster rate. And what is paranibbana? What happens then? I didn't know it was possible to know what paranibbana is.Alex123 wrote: According to orthodox teaching, this "here-and-now" will endlessly occur until parinibbana, not until first and last death (according to one-life only belief).
I notice that trying to meditate (samatha or vipassana) often adds more dukkha, not less. There are quicker ways to feel pleasure or peace than that.
Also trying to act "right" adds additional stress, and problems. What for if death is parinibbana anyways? Why complicate life even more?
If "here-and-now" will occur after the death of this body, then extra discomfort in meditation or following Dhamma to stop more dukkha after death of this body is justified. No pain, no gain.
But if parinibbana is going to occur anyways, why bother with extra stress?
Re: the great rebirth debate
Exactly. I've read too much Ajahn Brahm. As for peace, if one sleeps an extra hour - it is an extra hour of peace (as absence of perceived dukkha).Jerrod Lopes wrote:If your meditation practice is one of looking for pleasure, it's a waste of time.
One is better developing insight. But for what purpose if there was only one life?
Re: the great rebirth debate
The benefits are verifiable here and now. There's no need to wait for the next world, which is what everyone else was saying you had to do when the Buddha began teaching.Alex123 wrote: But for what purpose if there was only one life?
- "And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting oneself one protects others? By the pursuit, development, and cultivation of the four establishments of mindfulness. It is in such a way that by protecting oneself one protects others.
"And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting others one protects oneself? By patience, harmlessness, goodwill, and sympathy. It is in such a way that by protecting others one protects oneself.
- Sedaka Sutta [SN 47.19]
Re: the great rebirth debate
Which ones are those?daverupa wrote:The benefits are verifiable here and now. There's no need to wait for the next world, which is what everyone else was saying you had to do when the Buddha began teaching.Alex123 wrote: But for what purpose if there was only one life?
Not everybody is as gifted in meditation as Ajahn Brahm.
Re: the great rebirth debate
Not everyone meditates the same way, which probably matters quite a bit. I only meditate in certain ways, and the benefits accrue accordingly. So far as I am able to conform to a critical practice of what is found in the Nikayas, I find that the Nikayas correctly predict the results, and this is very encouraging.Alex123 wrote:Which ones are those?daverupa wrote:The benefits are verifiable here and now. There's no need to wait for the next world, which is what everyone else was saying you had to do when the Buddha began teaching.Alex123 wrote: But for what purpose if there was only one life?
Not everybody is as gifted in meditation as Ajahn Brahm.
I think people mostly try to stitch the Dhamma into their life, which is bound to give piecemeal results. But the Dhamma isn't this sort of head-game, neh? It is opanayiko.
- "And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting oneself one protects others? By the pursuit, development, and cultivation of the four establishments of mindfulness. It is in such a way that by protecting oneself one protects others.
"And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting others one protects oneself? By patience, harmlessness, goodwill, and sympathy. It is in such a way that by protecting others one protects oneself.
- Sedaka Sutta [SN 47.19]