I think that i that's why he said "a thing", because "things" have conditions for their existence and are conditioned.
Did Buddha Permanently Dwell in Nibbana or was In-and-Out
Re: Did Buddha Permanently Dwell in Nibbana or was In-and-Out
Last edited by User1249x on Mon Nov 12, 2018 2:56 am, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Did Buddha Permanently Dwell in Nibbana or was In-and-Out
Thanks for the reference. Although I'm very careful about Mahasi Sayadaw's books, I'm not convinced by them. Unless I see it in the Vism or commentaries, I don't take what he said for granted.
Re: Did Buddha Permanently Dwell in Nibbana or was In-and-Out
Mind can only take one object(conditioned/unconditioned) at a time. To engage with the "world" means having to "come out".
And what is right speech? Abstaining from lying, from divisive speech, from abusive speech, & from idle chatter: This is called right speech.
Re: Did Buddha Permanently Dwell in Nibbana or was In-and-Out
[/quote]
I hear you and I praise your carefulness with these things.
-
- Posts: 10262
- Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:32 am
- Location: Andromeda looks nice
Re: Did Buddha Permanently Dwell in Nibbana or was In-and-Out
This assumes that Nibbana is a mind-object, and I don't think that is clear from the suttas.
But leaving this aside, are you suggesting that the mind continually switches between conditioned and unconditioned?
Buddha save me from new-agers!
-
- Posts: 10262
- Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:32 am
- Location: Andromeda looks nice
Re: Did Buddha Permanently Dwell in Nibbana or was In-and-Out
It's tricky to find a suitable word though. "Thing" isn't really correct, but neither is "state", since states are conditioned.User1249x wrote: ↑Mon Nov 12, 2018 12:01 amI think that i that's why he said "a thing", because "things" have conditions for their existence and are conditioned.
Buddha save me from new-agers!
Re: Did Buddha Permanently Dwell in Nibbana or was In-and-Out
yeah i am glad you also see the problem thereinDinsdale wrote: ↑Mon Nov 12, 2018 9:09 amIt's tricky to find a suitable word though. "Thing" isn't really correct, but neither is "state", since states are conditioned.
Re: Did Buddha Permanently Dwell in Nibbana or was In-and-Out
The mind that has experienced nibbana is disinclined to engage in the conditioned realm. It doesn't mean it remains permanently in that state.
"This Dhamma that I have attained is deep, hard to see, hard to realize, peaceful, refined, beyond the scope of conjecture, subtle, to-be-experienced by the wise. But this generation delights in attachment, is excited by attachment, enjoys attachment. For a generation delighting in attachment, excited by attachment, enjoying attachment, this/that conditionality and dependent co-arising are hard to see. This state, too, is hard to see: the resolution of all fabrications, the relinquishment of all acquisitions, the ending of craving; dispassion; cessation; Unbinding. And if I were to teach the Dhamma and if others would not understand me, that would be tiresome for me, troublesome for me."
https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitak ... .than.html
And what is right speech? Abstaining from lying, from divisive speech, from abusive speech, & from idle chatter: This is called right speech.
-
- Posts: 10262
- Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:32 am
- Location: Andromeda looks nice
Re: Did Buddha Permanently Dwell in Nibbana or was In-and-Out
This passage describes Nibbana as a permanent transformation of mind ( citta ). It doesn't support your view of Nibbana as a transient mind-object.pegembara wrote: ↑Mon Nov 12, 2018 10:40 am The mind that has experienced nibbana is disinclined to engage in the conditioned realm. It doesn't mean it remains permanently in that state.
" This state, too, is hard to see: the resolution of all fabrications, the relinquishment of all acquisitions, the ending of craving; dispassion; cessation; Unbinding."
https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitak ... .than.html
If you make Nibbana a sense-object, then you make it conditioned - but Nibbana is unconditioned.
Buddha save me from new-agers!
Re: Did Buddha Permanently Dwell in Nibbana or was In-and-Out
This passage does not describe Nibbana as a permanent transformation of mind ( citta ). Otherwise, the passage would state "hard to realise". Nibbana is described as being present with or without a Buddha and has nothing to do with mind transformation.Dinsdale wrote: ↑Mon Nov 12, 2018 11:08 amThis passage describes Nibbana as a permanent transformation of mind ( citta ). It doesn't support your view of Nibbana as a transient mind-object.pegembara wrote: ↑Mon Nov 12, 2018 10:40 am The mind that has experienced nibbana is disinclined to engage in the conditioned realm. It doesn't mean it remains permanently in that state.
" This state, too, is hard to see: the resolution of all fabrications, the relinquishment of all acquisitions, the ending of craving; dispassion; cessation; Unbinding."
https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitak ... .than.html
If you make Nibbana a sense-object, then you make it conditioned - but Nibbana is unconditioned.
If nibbana cannot be known, then there is no escape from the conditioned. So it is an object("There is that") but not as you put it a transient sense object(ayatana). It is ungraspable.
Interesting that there is no mention of dimension of cessation of feeling & perception. Is there an equivalence to nibbana?There is that dimension, monks, where there is neither earth, nor water, nor fire, nor wind; neither dimension of the infinitude of space, nor dimension of the infinitude of consciousness, nor dimension of nothingness, nor dimension of neither perception nor non-perception; neither this world, nor the next world, nor sun, nor moon. And there, I say, there is neither coming, nor going, nor staying; neither passing away nor arising: unestablished,[1] unevolving, without support [mental object].[2] This, just this, is the end of stress.
"Furthermore, with the complete transcending of the dimension of the infinitude of space, [perceiving,] 'Infinite consciousness,' Sariputta entered & remained in the dimension of the infinitude of consciousness.
"Furthermore, with the complete transcending of the dimension of the infinitude of consciousness, [perceiving,] 'There is nothing,' Sariputta entered & remained in the dimension of nothingness.
"Furthermore, with the complete transcending of the dimension of nothingness, Sariputta entered & remained in the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception.
"Furthermore, with the complete transcending of the dimension of neither perception nor non-perception, Sariputta entered & remained in the cessation of feeling & perception. Seeing with discernment, his fermentations were totally ended. He emerged mindfully from that attainment.
https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitak ... .than.html
And what is right speech? Abstaining from lying, from divisive speech, from abusive speech, & from idle chatter: This is called right speech.
Re: Did Buddha Permanently Dwell in Nibbana or was In-and-Out
I am sure that the answer is yes and that is why it is only accessible to Ariya and not putthujanna. As i understand it, it takes a considerable amount of concentration to be able to attain such absorption at will so not all Ariya can do but all Ariya who have attained the seeing with discernment have realized cessation of all aggregates including feeling & perception at least once and are able to discern that unmade state.
Re: Did Buddha Permanently Dwell in Nibbana or was In-and-Out
I don't disagree with your statement but if i may weigh in with a comment as to how i understand it;
Technically to engage with the world does indeed mean having to "come out" and it is rightfully put in parentheses because it is not a coming out of but it is arising of the conditioned that is the "coming out" of absorbtion dependent on neither earth, fire, water, wind, nor the immaterial dimensions, the coming out of such absorption is the arising of the mind of a being.
As to the Ultimate Reality of the Unmade state, there is no coming into, staying therein nor going therefrom.
Mind of a being is that which, is called ‘mind’, or ‘thought’, or ‘consciousness’, that, arises and ceases, that mind can discern, know, imagine and even recollect the peace of cessation but being itself conditioned it is ultimately antithetical to the Ultimate Unmade Reality so the two do not come into direct contact with eachother because Ultimate Unmade Reality is not experienced thru the allness of the all.And there, I say, there is neither coming, nor going, nor staying;
Therefore there is a differentiation between The Unmade as a concept/ideation of the intellect and The Unmade as a ultimate reality, with the attainment of Parinibbana the conception of Nibbana no longer arises either because there is no more ‘mind’, or ‘thought’, or ‘consciousness’ to recollect, imagine or think about it.
Last edited by User1249x on Tue Nov 13, 2018 7:34 am, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Did Buddha Permanently Dwell in Nibbana or was In-and-Out
If anything, it requires a forest and seclusion. Everyday stress seems to disappear in the forest. Consciousness is easily let go of in the forest.User1249x wrote: ↑Tue Nov 13, 2018 5:48 amI am sure that the answer is yes and that is why it is only accessible to Ariya and not putthujanna. As i understand it, it takes a considerable amount of concentration to be able to attain such absorption at will so not all Ariya can do but all Ariya who have attained the seeing with discernment have realized cessation of all aggregates including feeling & perception at least once and are able to discern that unmade state.
Like the three marks of conditioned existence, this world in itself is filthy, hostile, and crowded
Re: Did Buddha Permanently Dwell in Nibbana or was In-and-Out
I like the use of parentheses to describe ‘mind’, or ‘thought’, or ‘consciousness’ which are all sankharas for ultimately there is no mind/consciousness/Self.User1249x wrote: ↑Tue Nov 13, 2018 6:21 amI don't disagree with your statement but if i may weigh in with a comment as to how i understand it;
Technically to engage with the world does indeed mean having to "come out" and it is rightfully put in parentheses because it is not a coming out of but it is arising of the conditioned that is the "coming out" of absorbtion dependent on neither earth, fire, water, wind, nor the immaterial dimensions, the coming out of such absorption is the arising of the mind of a being.
As to the Ultimate Reality of the Unmade state, there is no coming into, staying therein nor going therefrom.Mind of a being is that which, is called ‘mind’, or ‘thought’, or ‘consciousness’, that, arises and ceases, that mind can discern, know, imagine and even recollect the peace of cessation but being itself conditioned it is ultimately antithetical to the Ultimate Unmade Reality so the two do not come into direct contact with eachother because Ultimate Unmade Reality is not experienced thru the allness of the all.And there, I say, there is neither coming, nor going, nor staying;
Therefore there is a differentiation between The Unmade as a concept/ideation of the intellect and The Unmade as a ultimate reality, with the attainment of Parinibbana the conception of Nibbana no longer arises either because there is no more ‘mind’, or ‘thought’, or ‘consciousness’ to recollect, imagine or think about it.
Some, unfortunately, tend to cling to the idea of a 'something' that persists eternally."How, bhikkhus, do some overreach? Now some are troubled, ashamed, and disgusted by this very same being and they rejoice in (the idea of) non-being, asserting: 'In as much as this self, good sirs, when the body perishes at death, is annihilated and destroyed and does not exist after death — this is peaceful, this is excellent, this is reality!' Thus, bhikkhus, do some overreach.
I see the final nibbana or 'death' simply as the final cessation of all that is experienced."And how, bhikkhus, do some hold back? Devas and humans enjoy being, delight in being, are satisfied with being. When Dhamma is taught to them for the cessation of being, their minds do not enter into it or acquire confidence in it or settle upon it or become resolved upon it. Thus, bhikkhus, do some hold back.
So perhaps to reframe - What happens after parinibbana? Did Buddha Permanently Dwell in PariNibbana?"Now what, bhikkhus, is the Nibbana-element with no residue left? Here a bhikkhu is an arahant... completely released through final knowledge. For him, here in this very life, all that is experienced, not being delighted in, will be extinguished. That, bhikkhus, is called the Nibbana-element with no residue left.
Last edited by pegembara on Tue Nov 13, 2018 8:37 am, edited 2 times in total.
And what is right speech? Abstaining from lying, from divisive speech, from abusive speech, & from idle chatter: This is called right speech.
Re: Did Buddha Permanently Dwell in Nibbana or was In-and-Out
yes that's right. that's not the same as eternal. eternal is tied up with time which is change. if there is no change there's stasis, not continuation,
Born, become, arisen – made, prepared, short-lived
Bonded by decay and death – a nest for sickness, perishable
Produced by seeking nutriment – not fit to take delight in
Departure from this is peaceful – beyond reasoning and enduring
Unborn, unarisen – free from sorrow and stain
Ceasing of all factors of suffering – stilling of all preparations is bliss
Bonded by decay and death – a nest for sickness, perishable
Produced by seeking nutriment – not fit to take delight in
Departure from this is peaceful – beyond reasoning and enduring
Unborn, unarisen – free from sorrow and stain
Ceasing of all factors of suffering – stilling of all preparations is bliss