Where was Buddha born?
Re: Where was Buddha born?
Only that he was not born in Jambudipa, but indeed in Lumbini, a geographically very specific village in Nepal.
https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitak ... .than.html
- that the Ashokan pillar in Lumbini is a fake?
- the the Buddha was born in a different place than the Suttas tell us?
- maybe we are not even talking about the current, Theravadan Buddha, but any one of the other historical Buddhas, or even a future one?
- that people in the past had a very wrong idea what was written really in the Suttas, or the histoprical importance of Sri Lanka for Theravada?
Pls clarify.
https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitak ... .than.html
Without more commentary from you it is difficult to ascertain, what you want to tell us with your post:"The Bodhisatta, the foremost jewel, unequaled, has been born for welfare & ease in the human world, in a town in the Sakyan countryside, Lumbini.
- that the Ashokan pillar in Lumbini is a fake?
- the the Buddha was born in a different place than the Suttas tell us?
- maybe we are not even talking about the current, Theravadan Buddha, but any one of the other historical Buddhas, or even a future one?
- that people in the past had a very wrong idea what was written really in the Suttas, or the histoprical importance of Sri Lanka for Theravada?
Pls clarify.
The teaching is a lake with shores of ethics, unclouded, praised by the fine to the good.
There the knowledgeable go to bathe, and cross to the far shore without getting wet.
[SN 7.21]
There the knowledgeable go to bathe, and cross to the far shore without getting wet.
[SN 7.21]
Re: Where was Buddha born?
My favoured response is that it hardly matters, but that attempts to show that his birthplace was in Sri Lanka seem based on crude nationalist boosterism rather than scholarship. The main difficulty with that approach is that it depends upon a systematic multi-national attempt at historical revisionism which would serve no discernible purpose, and which would itself be the subject of modern historiographical interest.
In my country there are probably groups of people concerned to show that the Buddha was female, gay, transsexual, or an African refugee, but then again every country gets the revisionists it deserves.
In my country there are probably groups of people concerned to show that the Buddha was female, gay, transsexual, or an African refugee, but then again every country gets the revisionists it deserves.
-
- Posts: 2607
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 12:38 pm
Re: Where was Buddha born?
Certain said to be monks and an organised set of people tried to prove that lord Budda was born in sri lanka. TheySam Vara wrote: ↑Mon Oct 22, 2018 9:51 am My favoured response is that it hardly matters, but that attempts to show that his birthplace was in Sri Lanka seem based on crude nationalist boosterism rather than scholarship. The main difficulty with that approach is that it depends upon a systematic multi-national attempt at historical revisionism which would serve no discernible purpose, and which would itself be the subject of modern historiographical interest.
In my country there are probably groups of people concerned to show that the Buddha was female, gay, transsexual, or an African refugee, but then again every country gets the revisionists it deserves.
even had geographical evidence made up and created to prove their point. Yet the truth that lord budda was born in India had to be admitted in front of confrontation by highly educated intellectual monks who intervened in this matter.