Do you believe in the infallibility of the Buddha's word?
Do you believe in the infallibility of the Buddha's word?
Of course what's relevant is not the texts but whatever it is the Buddha said in his life, from the moment of his awakening to the moment of his death.
Born, become, arisen – made, prepared, short-lived
Bonded by decay and death – a nest for sickness, perishable
Produced by seeking nutriment – not fit to take delight in
Departure from this is peaceful – beyond reasoning and enduring
Unborn, unarisen – free from sorrow and stain
Ceasing of all factors of suffering – stilling of all preparations is bliss
Bonded by decay and death – a nest for sickness, perishable
Produced by seeking nutriment – not fit to take delight in
Departure from this is peaceful – beyond reasoning and enduring
Unborn, unarisen – free from sorrow and stain
Ceasing of all factors of suffering – stilling of all preparations is bliss
- JamesTheGiant
- Posts: 2145
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2015 8:41 am
- Location: New Zealand
Re: Do you believe in the infallibility of the Buddha's word?
Yes, BUT the suttas have been changed, edited, recompiled, retconned, deleted, added, invented, and mucked around with many many times. So it's all dodgy. You just have to use your common sense, and a bit of critical analysis.
Re: Do you believe in the infallibility of the Buddha's word?
I don't know. I don't think that matters here, as one can view the texts as fallible insofar as they don't reflect what the Buddha said while still having conviction that whatever he did say was infallible. This would depend on having a rough degree of faith in the texts by & large, though, albeit not altogether.
Born, become, arisen – made, prepared, short-lived
Bonded by decay and death – a nest for sickness, perishable
Produced by seeking nutriment – not fit to take delight in
Departure from this is peaceful – beyond reasoning and enduring
Unborn, unarisen – free from sorrow and stain
Ceasing of all factors of suffering – stilling of all preparations is bliss
Bonded by decay and death – a nest for sickness, perishable
Produced by seeking nutriment – not fit to take delight in
Departure from this is peaceful – beyond reasoning and enduring
Unborn, unarisen – free from sorrow and stain
Ceasing of all factors of suffering – stilling of all preparations is bliss
Re: Do you believe in the infallibility of the Buddha's word?
It's an interesting problem. As the only way to access anything that the Buddha said is via the texts, whatever in the texts led to a belief in infallibility could be something he didn't say, or wasn't true.dylanj wrote: ↑Fri Jun 22, 2018 6:44 amI don't know. I don't think that matters here, as one can view the texts as fallible insofar as they don't reflect what the Buddha said while still having conviction that whatever he did say was infallible. This would depend on having a rough degree of faith in the texts by & large, though, albeit not altogether.
- salayatananirodha
- Posts: 1479
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2018 1:34 am
- Contact:
Re: Do you believe in the infallibility of the Buddha's word?
What I know is that you can't get along as a Buddhist if you insist that the Buddha didn't teach from direct knowledge or that he failed to explain important doctrinal matters or fabricated anything as a sort of 'skillful means'. You practice for direct knowledge, not from (well, usually). My vote would be yes, but I haven't attained such insight, such confidence. But the promise given to us is well worth constantly trying to develop restraint. One has nothing to lose but suffering!
I host a sutta discussion via Zoom Sundays at 11AM Chicago time — message me if you are interested
Re: Do you believe in the infallibility of the Buddha's word?
Personally I do not think is an important question.
I think it might even be a counterproductive question?
Belief changes.
I think it might even be a counterproductive question?
Belief changes.
- salayatananirodha
- Posts: 1479
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2018 1:34 am
- Contact:
Re: Do you believe in the infallibility of the Buddha's word?
I prefer to use my imagination here. If a perfect teacher arose in the world, would he teach in such a way that his meaning is not easily confused and that his followers would be deeply compelled to learn and display? If you look at it like a chance game of telephone it doesn't inspire confidence, but you have early texts that match which are apparently descended from distinctly separate oral traditions. Furthermore, when has common sense led to the extinction of craving or clinging? Common sense has led to war, conflict and the total degeneration of morality and family. I don't trust my innate sense of reason as a non-arahant, I suggest you apply this favored skepticism to your own.JamesTheGiant wrote: ↑Fri Jun 22, 2018 6:40 am Yes, BUT the suttas have been changed, edited, recompiled, retconned, deleted, added, invented, and mucked around with many many times. So it's all dodgy. You just have to use your common sense, and a bit of critical analysis.
I host a sutta discussion via Zoom Sundays at 11AM Chicago time — message me if you are interested
Re: Do you believe in the infallibility of the Buddha's word?
salayatananirodha wrote: ↑Fri Jun 22, 2018 6:55 amI prefer to use my imagination here. If a perfect teacher arose in the world, would he teach in such a way that his meaning is not easily confused and that his followers would be deeply compelled to learn and display? If you look at it like a chance game of telephone it doesn't inspire confidence, but you have early texts that match which are apparently descended from distinctly separate oral traditions. Furthermore, when has common sense led to the extinction of craving or clinging? Common sense has led to war, conflict and the total degeneration of morality and family. I don't trust my innate sense of reason as a non-arahant, I suggest you apply this favored skepticism to your own.JamesTheGiant wrote: ↑Fri Jun 22, 2018 6:40 am Yes, BUT the suttas have been changed, edited, recompiled, retconned, deleted, added, invented, and mucked around with many many times. So it's all dodgy. You just have to use your common sense, and a bit of critical analysis.
Born, become, arisen – made, prepared, short-lived
Bonded by decay and death – a nest for sickness, perishable
Produced by seeking nutriment – not fit to take delight in
Departure from this is peaceful – beyond reasoning and enduring
Unborn, unarisen – free from sorrow and stain
Ceasing of all factors of suffering – stilling of all preparations is bliss
Bonded by decay and death – a nest for sickness, perishable
Produced by seeking nutriment – not fit to take delight in
Departure from this is peaceful – beyond reasoning and enduring
Unborn, unarisen – free from sorrow and stain
Ceasing of all factors of suffering – stilling of all preparations is bliss
- JamesTheGiant
- Posts: 2145
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2015 8:41 am
- Location: New Zealand
Re: Do you believe in the infallibility of the Buddha's word?
Yes, I agree with you. But I meant we must think carefully about which bits of the suttas are genuine, and which have been made up or changed, and not just swallow everything like Christian blind-faith fundamentalists.salayatananirodha wrote: ↑Fri Jun 22, 2018 6:55 am when has common sense led to the extinction of craving or clinging? Common sense has led to war, conflict and the total degeneration of morality and family. I don't trust my innate sense of reason as a non-arahant, I suggest you apply this favored skepticism to your own.
Re: Do you believe in the infallibility of the Buddha's word?
The only way to test the infallibility of the Buddha's word is to practice his teaching.
“As the lamp consumes oil, the path realises Nibbana”
- Wizard in the Forest
- Posts: 699
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:16 am
- Location: House in Forest of Illusions
Re: Do you believe in the infallibility of the Buddha's word?
The easiest Categorical answer.
YES.
YES.
"One is not born a woman, but becomes one."- Simone de Beauvoir
Re: Do you believe in the infallibility of the Buddha's word?
Born, become, arisen – made, prepared, short-lived
Bonded by decay and death – a nest for sickness, perishable
Produced by seeking nutriment – not fit to take delight in
Departure from this is peaceful – beyond reasoning and enduring
Unborn, unarisen – free from sorrow and stain
Ceasing of all factors of suffering – stilling of all preparations is bliss
Bonded by decay and death – a nest for sickness, perishable
Produced by seeking nutriment – not fit to take delight in
Departure from this is peaceful – beyond reasoning and enduring
Unborn, unarisen – free from sorrow and stain
Ceasing of all factors of suffering – stilling of all preparations is bliss
- Wizard in the Forest
- Posts: 699
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:16 am
- Location: House in Forest of Illusions
Re: Do you believe in the infallibility of the Buddha's word?
Svākkhāto bhagavatā dhammo: sandiṭṭhiko akāliko ehipassiko opaneyyiko paccattaṃ veditabbo viññūhī ti.
The Dhamma is well declared by the Blessed One: visible here and now, immediate, inviting to come and see, effective, to be individually ascertained by the wise.
The best way to find out, Sarath speaks truth.
The Dhamma is well declared by the Blessed One: visible here and now, immediate, inviting to come and see, effective, to be individually ascertained by the wise.
The best way to find out, Sarath speaks truth.
"One is not born a woman, but becomes one."- Simone de Beauvoir
Re: Do you believe in the infallibility of the Buddha's word?
I think the interesting question related to the OP would be whether the Buddha (for as much as we know him through our 'fallible' scriptures) would want us to take him as infallible. Based on for example the Kalama Sutta, I believe the answer to that is no. We can learn extremely much from the Buddha, but in the end it comes down to our confidence/faith that eventually leads to the 'knowing for oneself' that turns hearsay into experienced truth. So as long as our seeing him as infallible helps our confidence, great, but always in a spirit of investigation what is being said. If not you are not careful, infallibility can very easily leads to biblethumping
Dry up what pertains to the past,
do not take up anything to come later.
If you will not grasp in the middle,
you will live at peace.—Snp.5.11,v.1099 (tr. Ven. Bhikkhu Bodhi)
Whatever is will be was. —Ven. Ñānamoli, A Thinkers Notebook, §221
do not take up anything to come later.
If you will not grasp in the middle,
you will live at peace.—Snp.5.11,v.1099 (tr. Ven. Bhikkhu Bodhi)
Whatever is will be was. —Ven. Ñānamoli, A Thinkers Notebook, §221