Self in Animanls and Humans

A discussion on all aspects of Theravāda Buddhism
Circle5
Posts: 878
Joined: Wed May 31, 2017 2:14 am

Re: Self in Animanls and Humans

Post by Circle5 » Mon Mar 19, 2018 9:45 pm

DNS wrote:
Sun Mar 18, 2018 5:38 pm
I think scientists sometimes put the bar too high for what it means to have self-awareness. The mirror test and others are good, but how about just the mere pursuit of self-survival? I know some of that is instinctual, but we humans have that too. If an animal is being attacked, he/she definitely seeks survival, an escape route and seeks to continue living. This can be out of self-awareness that they exist and want to continue to exist and that they are aware that they want to continue to exist (maybe, not 100% sure though).
It can be, but it can also not be. Let's contemplate for a moment the mirror test. An animal sees himself in the mirror, that information enters that organism through its senses. And yet, there is not enough intelligence to make enough sense of it at a good enough level as to arise at the idea of selfhood. Contemplate how low the level of inteligence is in such a case. Such an organism is basically driven almost entirely by instincts. All it's reactions are controlled by instincts. There is unpleasant feeling of hunger arising, this conditions his next action, etc.

Only 5-10 animals pass the mirror test. Dogs and cats do not. How is life for such an animal ? There is just suffering arising, suffering ceasing according to conditions. There is no feeling of "me suffering" arising and no idea of "it is me that suffers". Such phenomenons do not arrise in such an organism. But when there is enough intelligence, such phenomenons do arise and they then go and lead to wrong view.

PS: I have the smartest pet on this forum, a jackdaw. (top 5 smartest animals) He is much, much smarter than a pigeon, but interestingly the pigeon can also recognize itself in the mirror, being one of the very few animals that can do that. This is somehow strange giving how robotic pigeons are. There are few animals more OCD-istic than a pigeon.

User avatar
Kim OHara
Posts: 4968
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 5:47 am
Location: North Queensland, Australia

Re: Self in Animanls and Humans

Post by Kim OHara » Mon Mar 19, 2018 9:50 pm

Circle5 wrote:
Mon Mar 19, 2018 9:45 pm
... Only 5-10 animals pass the mirror test. Dogs and cats do not.
Follow the link in my earlier post for an equivalent test for dogs, the "sniff test", which is a better match for their primary mode of perception and which they do pass.

:coffee:
Kim

justindesilva
Posts: 714
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 12:38 pm

Re: Self in Animanls and Humans

Post by justindesilva » Tue Mar 20, 2018 2:16 pm

one_awakening wrote:
Mon Mar 19, 2018 2:16 am
DNS wrote:
Sun Mar 18, 2018 5:38 pm
If an animal is being attacked, he/she definitely seeks survival, an escape route and seeks to continue living. This can be out of self-awareness that they exist and want to continue to exist and that they are aware that they want to continue to exist
Seeking survival is just an instinct, it doesn't require a sense of self.
In my academic studies I had studied a subject called Teritoriality. With this subject is taught that all animals and fishes identify an area to live . They attack intruders who are only within the range of their territory and their dangers are their life, nutrition or food, and shelter. Most of these animals mark their territory; eg: bears with their claw marks on trees, dogs by urination of points, cats often live within a house etc. So much on this subject.
My question here is, is it a self awareness of animals that make their territory. And is their any sutta which identify territiorility of animals.

User avatar
Sam Vara
Posts: 3955
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 5:42 pm
Location: Sussex, U.K.

Re: Self in Animanls and Humans

Post by Sam Vara » Tue Mar 20, 2018 2:51 pm

justindesilva wrote:
Tue Mar 20, 2018 2:16 pm
And is their any sutta which identify territiorility of animals.
"Once a hawk suddenly swooped down on a quail and seized it. Then the quail, as it was being carried off by the hawk, lamented, 'O, just my bad luck and lack of merit that I was wandering out of my proper range and into the territory of others! If only I had kept to my proper range today, to my own ancestral territory, this hawk would have been no match for me in battle.'

"'But what is your proper range?' the hawk asked. 'What is your own ancestral territory?'

"'A newly plowed field with clumps of earth all turned up.'
https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitak ... .than.html

justindesilva
Posts: 714
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 12:38 pm

Re: Self in Animanls and Humans

Post by justindesilva » Tue Mar 20, 2018 3:36 pm

Sam Vara wrote:
Tue Mar 20, 2018 2:51 pm
justindesilva wrote:
Tue Mar 20, 2018 2:16 pm
And is their any sutta which identify territiorility of animals.
"Once a hawk suddenly swooped down on a quail and seized it. Then the quail, as it was being carried off by the hawk, lamented, 'O, just my bad luck and lack of merit that I was wandering out of my proper range and into the territory of others! If only I had kept to my proper range today, to my own ancestral territory, this hawk would have been no match for me in battle.'

"'But what is your proper range?' the hawk asked. 'What is your own ancestral territory?'

"'A newly plowed field with clumps of earth all turned up.'
https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitak ... .than.html
Thank you my friend Sam Vera,
This is a question that haunted me for a long time!

Circle5
Posts: 878
Joined: Wed May 31, 2017 2:14 am

Re: Self in Animanls and Humans

Post by Circle5 » Wed Mar 21, 2018 12:06 am

Kim OHara wrote:
Mon Mar 19, 2018 9:50 pm
Circle5 wrote:
Mon Mar 19, 2018 9:45 pm
... Only 5-10 animals pass the mirror test. Dogs and cats do not.
Follow the link in my earlier post for an equivalent test for dogs, the "sniff test", which is a better match for their primary mode of perception and which they do pass.

:coffee:
Kim
True, for some rare cases that might be true. But in most cases the mirror test is good. That's what I was trying to prove with my previous post. At a first glance it might not look like a perfect test but if one really thinks about it, it actually is a pretty good test.

User avatar
one_awakening
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2017 6:04 am

Re: Self in Animanls and Humans

Post by one_awakening » Thu Mar 22, 2018 2:17 am

Circle5 wrote:
Mon Mar 19, 2018 9:45 pm
An animal sees himself in the mirror, that information enters that organism through its senses. And yet, there is not enough intelligence to make enough sense of it at a good enough level as to arise at the idea of selfhood.
Yes, I agree with this. It basically comes down to intelligence. We see ourselves in the mirror and the brain says "This is me". From that comes "This is mine" and the self continues to build from there.
“You only lose what you cling to”

chownah
Posts: 7363
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:19 pm

Re: Self in Animanls and Humans

Post by chownah » Thu Mar 22, 2018 4:48 am

I think there is an assumption here that the intelligence which is enough for self view is always enough and of the right kind to figure out a mirror. I can't see why this is necessarily so.
chownah

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: cookiemonster, Google [Bot], TRobinson465 and 98 guests