A discussion on all aspects of Theravāda Buddhism
-
binocular
- Posts: 5078
- Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 11:13 pm
Post
by binocular » Sat Mar 10, 2018 9:40 am
davidbrainerd wrote: ↑Sat Mar 10, 2018 3:17 am
There's a new movement of non-buddhists who are finding the sort of principles contained there very helpful in living in the world,
but its all male. They're living this way to avoid getting MeToo'd and to avoid being used as nothing but a disposable tool by society.
Exactly. It's all male.
Secondly, how do you deal with the possibility that those espousing those principles could abandon them anytime?
Even what seemed dedicated monks sometimes disrobe and take up a lifestyle they criticized severely when they were monks. People change. Some go from vegan to meat-eating supporters. In fact, it seems quite common that people with high ideals eventually resort to lifestyles they previously disapproved of.
Such things happening does not fill me with hope and with trust in what those idealistic people are saying.
-
binocular
- Posts: 5078
- Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 11:13 pm
Post
by binocular » Sat Mar 10, 2018 10:25 am
Will wrote: ↑Sat Mar 10, 2018 3:51 am
Is it the world doing the 'squishing' or our worldly mind? To quote Buddha:
Whatever one frequently thinks and ponders upon, that will become the inclination of his mind. -- MN 19
The mind is the determining factor, so as long as one thinks the world will squish helpless lay folk, then that is the way one will live.
So it's all in my head?
My concern is that the idea that it's all in my head is just all in my head, and isn't how things actually are. And that the crucial things in life are independent of how one thinks about them.
-
Sam Vara
- Posts: 3296
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 5:42 pm
- Location: Sussex, U.K.
Post
by Sam Vara » Sat Mar 10, 2018 11:39 am
binocular wrote: ↑Sat Mar 10, 2018 10:25 am
So it's all in my head?
No, it's in your fathom-long body.
https://suttacentral.net/an4.45/en/sujato
My concern is that the idea that it's all in my head is just all in my head
But the
concern is all in your head, isn't it?
and isn't how things actually are. And that the crucial things in life are independent of how one thinks about them.
You don't know how things actually are. And things being "crucial" is only our judgement about them. There is no objective crux.
-
binocular
- Posts: 5078
- Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 11:13 pm
Post
by binocular » Sat Mar 10, 2018 11:41 am
Sam Vara wrote: ↑Sat Mar 10, 2018 11:39 am
There is no objective crux.
And this is supposed to be an objective statement?
This is both funny, and so not.
-
Sam Vara
- Posts: 3296
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 5:42 pm
- Location: Sussex, U.K.
Post
by Sam Vara » Sat Mar 10, 2018 12:07 pm
binocular wrote: ↑Sat Mar 10, 2018 11:41 am
Sam Vara wrote: ↑Sat Mar 10, 2018 11:39 am
There is no objective crux.
And this is supposed to be an objective statement?
No, a working hypothesis.
-
binocular
- Posts: 5078
- Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 11:13 pm
Post
by binocular » Sat Mar 10, 2018 2:43 pm
Sam Vara wrote: ↑Sat Mar 10, 2018 12:07 pm
No, a working hypothesis.
It's not clear how at this level of importance and urgency, one could allow for working hypotheses.
-
Sam Vara
- Posts: 3296
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 5:42 pm
- Location: Sussex, U.K.
Post
by Sam Vara » Sat Mar 10, 2018 3:12 pm
binocular wrote: ↑Sat Mar 10, 2018 2:43 pm
Sam Vara wrote: ↑Sat Mar 10, 2018 12:07 pm
No, a working hypothesis.
It's not clear how at this level of importance and urgency, one could allow for working hypotheses.
It's all you've got. Dogmatism can lead one in the wrong direction. Lack of commitment will go nowhere. So make your best-informed hypothesis, and test it through action.
-
Will
- Posts: 866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:26 pm
- Location: So Cal
Post
by Will » Sat Mar 10, 2018 4:10 pm
binocular wrote: ↑Sat Mar 10, 2018 10:25 am
Will wrote: ↑Sat Mar 10, 2018 3:51 am
Is it the world doing the 'squishing' or our worldly mind? To quote Buddha:
Whatever one frequently thinks and ponders upon, that will become the inclination of his mind. -- MN 19
The mind is the determining factor, so as long as one thinks the world will squish helpless lay folk, then that is the way one will live.
So it's all in my head?
My concern is that the idea that it's all in my head is just all in my head, and isn't how things actually are. And that the crucial things in life are independent of how one thinks about them.
Not 'all in your head' (nor all 'out there') but no avoiding the head or mind filter. As verse 768? says:
3. Whoever avoids sensual pleasures
as if the head of a snake with his foot,
the sticky nature of the world
he mindfully passes over.
Whatever one frequently thinks and ponders upon, that will become the inclination of his mind. -- MN 19
-
aflatun
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2016 2:40 pm
- Location: Bay Area, CA
Post
by aflatun » Sat Mar 10, 2018 5:15 pm
SDC wrote: ↑Wed Mar 07, 2018 3:56 pm
I've already read a few of these and they are very well done. Bravo to all those involved
Ditto and ditto. I'm really enjoying reading this, and its fitting in with my collection of sutta nipata translations quite well
SDC wrote: ↑Wed Mar 07, 2018 3:56 pm
and to Path Press for offering yet another great title free of charge.
For real
"People often get too quick to say 'there's no self. There's no self...no self...no self.' There is self, there is focal point, its not yours. That's what not self is."
Ninoslav Ñāṇamoli
Senses and the Thought-1, 42:53
"Those who create constructs about the Buddha,
Who is beyond construction and without exhaustion,
Are thereby damaged by their constructs;
They fail to see the Thus-Gone.
That which is the nature of the Thus-Gone
Is also the nature of this world.
There is no nature of the Thus-Gone.
There is no nature of the world."
Nagarjuna
MMK XXII.15-16