Why so few Western Buddhists?

Some topics tend to get heated and go off track in unwholesome ways quite quickly. The "hot topics" sub-forum is a place where such topics may be moved so that each post must be manually approved by moderator before it will become visible to members.
sentinel
Posts: 3236
Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2017 1:26 pm

Re: Why so few Western Buddhists?

Post by sentinel »

Subharo wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2018 9:29 pm
James Tan wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2018 4:46 pm How many people actually are Master of the Dhamma ?
How many people actually can Master the Dhamma ?
binocular wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2018 5:10 pm
Except that it's not clear what the "original teachings of the Buddha" are. In fact, this is one of the controversial topics!
...
Except that it is the Buddha himself who does that, which I think is categorically different from anything anyone else can do. It's not clear that the situations described in the suttas can be meaningfully compared to present times when the Buddha isn't actually here anymore to take part in discussions.
James Tan and binocular, I think you are suffering from the logical fallacy called "black-or-white".

James Tan seems to imply that only an arahat deserves to speak on the Dhamma in a way that can be trusted, not any monk with an attainment level lower than that (or no attainment level at all).

Binocular seems to imply that since we can't know 100% what the Buddha actually said (or would say, if he were still alive today), then what's the point of investigating it whatsoever (in a rigorous, debate-like manner)?
Wrong assumption, that is the fallacy you suffered instead .
My meaning only saying that dhamma is something very profound not to mention to practise and mastered at it . How many people actually can mastered it like an arhat !
E.g. Schumacher , not many people can drive like him , a professional racing driver in the Formula One car race series .

Sure , you or anyone can join in on any debate , however that is not my point .
Anyway , just bring it on !
Just joking .
binocular
Posts: 8292
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 11:13 pm

Re: Why so few Western Buddhists?

Post by binocular »

Saengnapha wrote: Sat Jan 13, 2018 3:23 amSurely this assumption by you is a self created reaction that can only lead to a wrong view. Even if the monk was out of his mind, (he probably is :tongue: ), your view of him would be in conflict with Dhamma as an emotional reaction that prevents you from Right View, the first stage of the 8FP. Why assume any position of elevation/inferiority? The orientation needs to be one of reasoning in light of the Dhamma, not our particular preferences or assumptions. This also goes for the monk, I might add.
That would be nice, but it's not my experience. Already because I am female, I am being placed in a different category or position, one of inferiority.
You do realize that some monks make a point of not even looking at a woman at all, and how weird it is for a woman to know this and to try to have a conversation with (such) a monk? Or to read a text written by a monk, knowing that the person who is saying those things would never even look at me? It's difficult not to feel despised or regarded as stupid (even more so when the monk is criticizing women, or putthujanas in general). There are rules for monks relevant for lay women, and as a woman, I have to keep this in mind. The differences between men and women are real; as are the differences between lay women and monks.
It's difficult for me to make sense of all this, and there doesn't really seem to be anyone whom I could talk to about this.
The unwritten, unspoken rule seems to be that I, as a woman, better bow my head and be quiet.
Hic Rhodus, hic salta!
binocular
Posts: 8292
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 11:13 pm

Re: Why so few Western Buddhists?

Post by binocular »

Subharo wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:50 pmI'd like to add to my list of interesting and relevant (at least I feel are relevant) Suttas, basically all of the AN 4's (which is a lot of Suttas, sorry for that). There are many fiesty suttas there (every bit as fiesty as anything I've ever said on this forum), where the Buddha makes very direct and uncomfortable statements to the effect of trying to maintain the integrity of his teachings.

If you might think that all of the Buddhas teachings are as gentle as a sullen-eyed, bleating lamb, then AN 4's (especially) livens up the Suttas a lot. There are spicy suttas all over the AN, BTW (a whole bunch more in AN 5's), but the 4's seems to have a particularly dense concentration.
You're preaching to the choir. Your objections would surely have a lot of traction somewhere else, but not here at this forum.
:stirthepot:
Hic Rhodus, hic salta!
Saengnapha
Posts: 1350
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 10:17 am

Re: Why so few Western Buddhists?

Post by Saengnapha »

No_Mind wrote: Sat Jan 13, 2018 4:21 am
Saengnapha wrote: Sat Jan 13, 2018 4:02 am Generalizations are never going to lead to truth, or even success in practice. The whole idea of this line of thinking only leads to views which are not in line with Dhamma. It is the same for a westerner or an Asian. These views should be listed under current events and entertainment sections.
I, the OP had created this thread in current events section and mods moved it here. Probably you should be little more aware/alert before your generalizations.

:namaste:
I am not omniscient, No Mind. :smile:
Saengnapha
Posts: 1350
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 10:17 am

Re: Why so few Western Buddhists?

Post by Saengnapha »

binocular wrote: Sat Jan 13, 2018 11:00 am
Saengnapha wrote: Sat Jan 13, 2018 3:23 amSurely this assumption by you is a self created reaction that can only lead to a wrong view. Even if the monk was out of his mind, (he probably is :tongue: ), your view of him would be in conflict with Dhamma as an emotional reaction that prevents you from Right View, the first stage of the 8FP. Why assume any position of elevation/inferiority? The orientation needs to be one of reasoning in light of the Dhamma, not our particular preferences or assumptions. This also goes for the monk, I might add.
That would be nice, but it's not my experience. Already because I am female, I am being placed in a different category or position, one of inferiority.
You do realize that some monks make a point of not even looking at a woman at all, and how weird it is for a woman to know this and to try to have a conversation with (such) a monk? Or to read a text written by a monk, knowing that the person who is saying those things would never even look at me? It's difficult not to feel despised or regarded as stupid (even more so when the monk is criticizing women, or putthujanas in general). There are rules for monks relevant for lay women, and as a woman, I have to keep this in mind. The differences between men and women are real; as are the differences between lay women and monks.
It's difficult for me to make sense of all this, and there doesn't really seem to be anyone whom I could talk to about this.
The unwritten, unspoken rule seems to be that I, as a woman, better bow my head and be quiet.
binocular, I concur and agree with you 100%. I have some familiarity with women. My wife is one. :D
You seem like a very observant person, aware of how others act and how they treat you. What I was suggesting was not to get caught up in these views of yourself(inferiority), or others (righteous behavior and attitude) when you do see these kinds of things happening because they can create dukkha. I think you are smart enough to recognize someone's limitations. All the years I spent around U.G., I never saw him treat women any differently than men. For him, there was no 'other', just activity going on. He didn't want anything from people so there was never a disappointment.
auto
Posts: 4579
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2017 12:02 pm

Re: Why so few Western Buddhists?

Post by auto »

Subharo wrote: Fri Jan 12, 2018 12:36 am
auto wrote: Thu Jan 11, 2018 11:21 am people who wear robes and staying in monasteries doesn't make them recluse.
Once you use your psychic powers to embrace my mind with your own, and catch me red-handed posting on this forum without any serenity or any Brahmavihara, it is at that time that I will take your complaints seriously. All I am saying here is that I try to make an effort to check in with the state of my heart before posting. This isn't a claim to attainments, which you might be tempted to conclude.
auto wrote: Thu Jan 11, 2018 11:21 am Do you have evidence that earth is round? For the sense organs it may be round.
Surely you jest.
i got my blood boil and made a post and seeing your response i had several different responses to it whilst some of them were against previous thoughts, what i didn't respond finally i come back to the senses. So i know that i can talk against my own one hour later.
binocular
Posts: 8292
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 11:13 pm

Re: Why so few Western Buddhists?

Post by binocular »

Saengnapha wrote: Sat Jan 13, 2018 1:02 pmWhat I was suggesting was not to get caught up in these views of yourself(inferiority), or others (righteous behavior and attitude) when you do see these kinds of things happening because they can create dukkha.
I suppose it's because some (many?) Westerners (esp. women) don't know how to not get caught up in those views of superiority/inferiority that there aren't more Western Buddhists.

But how does one not get caught up in those views? This is a big challenge!
Hic Rhodus, hic salta!
User avatar
retrofuturist
Posts: 27839
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Why so few Western Buddhists?

Post by retrofuturist »

Greetings Binocular,
binocular wrote: Sat Jan 13, 2018 9:13 pm But how does one not get caught up in those views? This is a big challenge!
SN 22.49

Metta,
Paul. :)
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
binocular
Posts: 8292
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 11:13 pm

Re: Why so few Western Buddhists?

Post by binocular »

retrofuturist wrote: Sat Jan 13, 2018 9:20 pmSN 22.49
And there are people who actually believe that and act accordingly?
And people who wouldn't shame or exploit those who believe that and act accordingly?
Hic Rhodus, hic salta!
Saengnapha
Posts: 1350
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 10:17 am

Re: Why so few Western Buddhists?

Post by Saengnapha »

binocular wrote: Sat Jan 13, 2018 10:09 pm
retrofuturist wrote: Sat Jan 13, 2018 9:20 pmSN 22.49
And there are people who actually believe that and act accordingly?
And people who wouldn't shame or exploit those who believe that and act accordingly?
There will always be others that will exploit and shame people when the opportunity arises. If you don't think of yourself as inferior, how can it affect you? They are simply acting in a hurtful way to themselves. Keeping your own attention on your own reactions is the key to orienting them away from your habit of thinking badly about yourself. This is the only thing you can control, not the actions/reactions of others.
chownah
Posts: 9336
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:19 pm

Re: Why so few Western Buddhists?

Post by chownah »

binocular wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2018 10:02 am
chownah wrote: Wed Jan 10, 2018 3:24 amYou say "because harmony is valued above everything else" when speaking of eastern culture....I dispute that statement.
If harmony was valued above everything else then there would be no wars in eastern culture.
If harmony was valued above everything else then there would be no quarrels in eastern culture.
If harmony was valued above all else there would be no murders in eastern culture.
If harmoney was valued above all else then people would not amass gold in eastern culture.
If harmoney was valued above all else then it would not need to be enforced in eastern culture.
It's in order to establish harmony that people are executed, wars fought etc. It's because harmony is so important to them that they will kill for it.
Surely you jest. Most wars have been fought over power and wealth....in fact wars are almost exclusivly fought over power and wealth......"give me this piece of land as my control of it is necessary for harmony"..... :jawdrop: :jumping: :rofl:
chownah
User avatar
Crazy cloud
Posts: 930
Joined: Sun May 12, 2013 8:55 am

Re: Why so few Western Buddhists?

Post by Crazy cloud »

Here's is a piece of land that looks quite harmonious ... :tongue:

Image
If you didn't care
What happened to me
And I didn't care for you

We would zig-zag our way
Through the boredom and pain
Occasionally glancing up through the rain

Wondering which of the
Buggers to blame
And watching for pigs on the wing
- Roger Waters
binocular
Posts: 8292
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 11:13 pm

Re: Why so few Western Buddhists?

Post by binocular »

chownah wrote: Tue Jan 16, 2018 1:59 pmSurely you jest. Most wars have been fought over power and wealth....in fact wars are almost exclusivly fought over power and wealth......"give me this piece of land as my control of it is necessary for harmony".....
Tomayto, tomahto.
Hic Rhodus, hic salta!
chownah
Posts: 9336
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:19 pm

Re: Why so few Western Buddhists?

Post by chownah »

binocular wrote: Wed Jan 17, 2018 4:28 pm
chownah wrote: Tue Jan 16, 2018 1:59 pmSurely you jest. Most wars have been fought over power and wealth....in fact wars are almost exclusivly fought over power and wealth......"give me this piece of land as my control of it is necessary for harmony".....
Tomayto, tomahto.
Are you saying that "harmony" and "power and wealth" are the same thing?...or is this some obscure pali reference?.....or something else...
chownah
binocular
Posts: 8292
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 11:13 pm

Re: Why so few Western Buddhists?

Post by binocular »

Some say wars are fought for power, some say they are fought for harmony. Now what?
Hic Rhodus, hic salta!
Post Reply