Questions about Mara
Questions about Mara
Can Mara kill any putthujana he wishes to? Can Mara do anything he wishes to a putthujana? Or is he limited?
Re: Questions about Mara
No, he can tempt people but cannot take direct action on them because no one, not even the Buddha, can change the law of kamma. For example, if Mara could kill a virtuous person who abstains from taking life, then that would've violated the law of kamma. However he can tempt the person into commiting unwholesome deeds. If that person is not heedful and gave in to evil, then s/he'll reap the consequences in due time due to their own kamma.
AN 5.57 wrote:I am the owner of my actions,[1] heir to my actions, born of my actions, related through my actions, and have my actions as my arbitrator. Whatever I do, for good or for evil, to that will I fall heir.
Re: Questions about Mara
Some interesting reading.
Letter from Mara.
http://www.arrowriver.ca/maraidx.html
Have you face to face with Mara.
http://dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.php?f= ... 564&hilit=
Letter from Mara.
http://www.arrowriver.ca/maraidx.html
Have you face to face with Mara.
http://dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.php?f= ... 564&hilit=
“As the lamp consumes oil, the path realises Nibbana”
Re: Questions about Mara
Well, I would say that the Evil one (Mara) is just Virtue that takes all liberties.
So you better be (sure to be) a God to allow that to yourself; and that you also come from the right sphere.
Evil is indeed very virtuous. He will not admit the slightest fault; might you pretend to be good and virtuous.
Let us not forget that Mara has reached the highest sphere of the world of senses (kamaloka), because he was a generous and a virtuous man.
For this is how you get to the highest sphere of the kamaloka: being generous and virtuous.
And he has not forgotten that.
O! - and he loves to trick people - and guess who?
You should see the power of Good differently now.
So you better be (sure to be) a God to allow that to yourself; and that you also come from the right sphere.
Evil is indeed very virtuous. He will not admit the slightest fault; might you pretend to be good and virtuous.
Let us not forget that Mara has reached the highest sphere of the world of senses (kamaloka), because he was a generous and a virtuous man.
For this is how you get to the highest sphere of the kamaloka: being generous and virtuous.
And he has not forgotten that.
O! - and he loves to trick people - and guess who?
You should see the power of Good differently now.
In this world, there are many people acting and yearning for the Mara's world; some for the Brahma's world; and very few for the Unborn.
Re: Questions about Mara
I was thinking "Mara" was just a concept, to give a nice story like flavour to "Defilements" or "bad deeds" !.
Like, say I get a thought to harm someone, if I see the danger in harming (i.e. i am being not ignorant, mindful and alert), i would not proceed, but if i am ignorant, i would proceed and act. Now, when I am not ignorant, it would be "I have seen the Mara, and have out-smarted him! (so he could not catch me)", but when i am ignorant, it would be "I got caught to Mara".
Like, say I get a thought to harm someone, if I see the danger in harming (i.e. i am being not ignorant, mindful and alert), i would not proceed, but if i am ignorant, i would proceed and act. Now, when I am not ignorant, it would be "I have seen the Mara, and have out-smarted him! (so he could not catch me)", but when i am ignorant, it would be "I got caught to Mara".
Sīlepatiṭṭhāya naro sapañño, cittaṃ paññañca bhāvayaṃ;
Ātāpī nipako bhikkhu, so imaṃ vijaṭaye jaṭanti.
Ātāpī nipako bhikkhu, so imaṃ vijaṭaye jaṭanti.
Re: Questions about Mara
But beings can kill other beings. Is Mara a being or is Mara purely symbolic? Does all taking of life violate the law of kamma?santa100 wrote:For example, if Mara could kill a virtuous person who abstains from taking life, then that would've violated the law of kamma. However he can tempt the person into commiting unwholesome deeds. If that person is not heedful and gave in to evil, then s/he'll reap the consequences in due time due to their own kamma.
Re: Questions about Mara
Some people interprets Mara to be strictly and exlusively symbolic. But MN 50 made it clear that's not the case. About the violation of kamma, that means that Mara simply cannot just kill any being as he likes, even to those who did not commit the killing themselves. That's what I meant about "violating the law of kamma", there can't be a re-action without an action. That's exactly the reason why I consider Mara a "tempter" instead of an "almighty", someone who tempts you, yes "You", to do things that will lead to your own downfall.MrMan wrote:But beings can kill other beings. Is Mara a being or is Mara purely symbolic? Does all taking of life violate the law of kamma?
Re: Questions about Mara
Are there human beings Mara can kill?santa100 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 28, 2016 6:19 pmSome people interprets Mara to be strictly and exlusively symbolic. But MN 50 made it clear that's not the case. About the violation of kamma, that means that Mara simply cannot just kill any being as he likes, even to those who did not commit the killing themselves. That's what I meant about "violating the law of kamma", there can't be a re-action without an action. That's exactly the reason why I consider Mara a "tempter" instead of an "almighty", someone who tempts you, yes "You", to do things that will lead to your own downfall.MrMan wrote:But beings can kill other beings. Is Mara a being or is Mara purely symbolic? Does all taking of life violate the law of kamma?