Bhante Jag - Euthanasia

A discussion on all aspects of Theravāda Buddhism
User avatar
dylanj
Posts: 672
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 1:48 am
Location: San Francisco
Contact:

Re: Bhante Jag - Euthanasia

Post by dylanj » Mon Feb 19, 2018 2:19 am

SarathW wrote:
Thu Sep 22, 2016 7:59 am
Blameless means that they do not have another life. (Can someone give me Sutta support for this?)
Sāriputta, when one lays down this body and takes up another body, then I say one is blameworthy.
SN 35.87
susukhaṁ vata nibbānaṁ,
sammā­sambud­dha­desitaṁ;
asokaṁ virajaṁ khemaṁ,
yattha dukkhaṁ nirujjhatī


Oh! extinction is so very blissful,
As taught by the One Rightly Self-Awakened:
Sorrowless, stainless, secure;
Where suffering all ceases


etaṁ santaṁ etaṁ paṇītaṁ yadidaṁ sabbasaṅkhārasamatho sabbūpadhipaṭi nissaggo taṇhakkhayo virāgo nirodho nibbānaṁ

This is peaceful, this is excellent, that is: the stilling of all preparations, the relinquishment of all attachments, the destruction of craving, detachment, cessation, extinction.

User avatar
dylanj
Posts: 672
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 1:48 am
Location: San Francisco
Contact:

Re: Bhante Jag - Euthanasia

Post by dylanj » Mon Feb 19, 2018 2:20 am

oh this is old you probably got an answer somewhere
susukhaṁ vata nibbānaṁ,
sammā­sambud­dha­desitaṁ;
asokaṁ virajaṁ khemaṁ,
yattha dukkhaṁ nirujjhatī


Oh! extinction is so very blissful,
As taught by the One Rightly Self-Awakened:
Sorrowless, stainless, secure;
Where suffering all ceases


etaṁ santaṁ etaṁ paṇītaṁ yadidaṁ sabbasaṅkhārasamatho sabbūpadhipaṭi nissaggo taṇhakkhayo virāgo nirodho nibbānaṁ

This is peaceful, this is excellent, that is: the stilling of all preparations, the relinquishment of all attachments, the destruction of craving, detachment, cessation, extinction.

User avatar
Dhammarakkhito
Posts: 1115
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:31 am
Contact:

Re: Bhante Jag - Euthanasia

Post by Dhammarakkhito » Mon Feb 19, 2018 2:25 am

i'm listening now this sounds foolish to me. there is simply no proof that any of the monks were arahants who killed themselves. only that they attempted suicide and entered parinibbāna. the monk is agenda driven. being a violation of the pañcasīla or not is not the only argument one can put forth. attempting suicide implies craving for non-existence. abandoning vitality fabrications is not the same, pain simply doesn't invade the arahant's mind. experiencing pain isn't an ignoble austerity in itself because it isn't volitional. from plain wording though it does seem that suicide is a violation of pancasila because it is taking the life of a living being. dabba sutta looks radically different, the arahant doesn't claim to be suffering, doesn't try to self-annihilate (no conceit) and simply burns up in the air.

“Let the venerable Channa not use the knife. Let the venerable Channa live. We want the venerable Channa to live. If he lacks suitable food, I will go in search of suitable food for him. If he lacks suitable medicine, I will go in search of suitable medicine for him. If he lacks a proper attendant, I will attend on him. Let the venerable Channa not use the knife. Let the venerable Channa live. We want the venerable Channa to live.”

http://www.yellowrobe.com/component/con ... hanna.html
let that serve as ideal disposition to suicide
"Just as the ocean has a single taste — that of salt — in the same way, this Dhamma-Vinaya has a single taste: that of release."
— Ud 5.5

https://www.facebook.com/noblebuddhadha ... 34/?type=3

http://seeingthroughthenet.net/
https://sites.google.com/site/santipada ... allytaught

User avatar
Dhammarakkhito
Posts: 1115
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:31 am
Contact:

Re: Bhante Jag - Euthanasia

Post by Dhammarakkhito » Mon Feb 19, 2018 2:30 am

first few pages here; would like a suitable refutation, if any, to show that anything less is required for sotāpanna.
"Just as the ocean has a single taste — that of salt — in the same way, this Dhamma-Vinaya has a single taste: that of release."
— Ud 5.5

https://www.facebook.com/noblebuddhadha ... 34/?type=3

http://seeingthroughthenet.net/
https://sites.google.com/site/santipada ... allytaught

User avatar
rightviewftw
Posts: 1310
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 8:50 pm

Re: Bhante Jag - Euthanasia

Post by rightviewftw » Mon Feb 19, 2018 12:17 pm

Dhammarakkhito wrote:
Mon Feb 19, 2018 2:25 am
attempting suicide implies craving for non-existence.
There is a difference between aversion to existence and craving for non-existence.
Another example idk if you are familiar;

Daughter of Anathapindika who himself was a Sotapanna, stopped eating because she could not find a husband, she was a Sakidagami. Reborn in Tusita Heaven.

Also in Regards to Suttas in the Video it is not a rational assumption to assume that Canna lied to Sariputta when he said it was Blameless!
That is the commentary position. It can be assumed by all means, it is a free world but it is not the most apparently obvious interpretation of the text, that can be proven by logic. Even more so Sariputta himself was questioning him on attainment of Arahantship! Second in wisdom to Tathagata!

For rest, if you want a refutation from me you have to take a position and make a thread. You will find most answers here;
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=29507&start=140 I posted as r1111

you can look how that ended if u don't want to read the whole thing, i also made mistakes in OP. I would like to redo it by all means with me being challenged formally. I don't think i have to defend my position on this forum again as long as not officially challenged or presented with points previously not adressed. It would also be good if opposition answers all questions next time, not 1/4 or so.

Id like to destroy that evil view so you got my attention.
Dhammarakkhito wrote:
Mon Feb 19, 2018 2:25 am
the monk is agenda driven.
what is the motive?
Last edited by rightviewftw on Mon Feb 19, 2018 12:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
How to Destroy any addiction
How to Meditate: Satipatthana Mahasi
Медитация Сатипаттхана Випассана
How To Develop Factors of Enlightenment & Perceptions
Complete Manual of Insight by Mahasi Sayadaw
Tyranny of Words - An Introduction to General Semantics
Ledi Sayadaw's Anapana Dipani (Samatha) @ ffmt.fr/articles/maitres/LediS/anapana-dipani.ledi-sayadaw.pdf
Dhammapada @ myweb.ncku.edu.tw/~lsn46/tipitaka/sutta/khuddaka/dhammapada/dhp-contrast-reading/dhp-contrast-reading-en/
don't feed the trolls

User avatar
rightviewftw
Posts: 1310
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 8:50 pm

Re: Bhante Jag - Euthanasia

Post by rightviewftw » Mon Feb 19, 2018 2:55 pm

Monk Jag wrote:
Sun Oct 16, 2016 9:57 pm
Hi all

Sarath - Thanks for the invitation to contribute to this discussion and sorry about the late reply as I have been away on retreat and when I got back, was hit with a mountain of work.

The text is quite clear from the Buddha's lips on this matter, it is the commentators that want it to be otherwise as it does not fit neatly into their much-loved (and deeply attached to) pre-conceived understanding of Dhamma through the distorted lenses of commentarial literature.

If you read the texts as is, there is little to ponder. Unfortunately too many monks confuse the work of the Buddha with the work of commentators, and one of these two has a greater authority than the other. This has led of course to misunderstandings and misrepresentations of the Buddha's teaching and is a case of "expanding on what should not be expanded on". The Buddha said that these people slander the Tathagatta: "Those who expand what should not be expanded, and those who do not expand those teachings that require expansion".

Monks who try to force Christian values of "suicide = hell" in some automatic fashion do not understand even the 5 precepts no matter how many times they chant them.​ The Buddha himself also warned about making conclusions in a simple way about Kamma, and that any man who tried to work out Kamma would go mad. So the idea of a simple suicide = hell, and suicide= bad sila is clearly mistaken and has no place in an academic study on the topic.

If anyone can show textual evidence from the suttas that categorically shows that Arahants are incapable of killing themselves, then I am more than happy to investigate. I have (in reading the Suttas) not found such evidence. This is in contrast to the references in a few suttas indicating that Arahants killed themselves due to illness. The burden of proof here is on those who claim arahants cannot kill themselves, not the other way around, as the text clearly indicates that Arahants have indeed "Used the knife" and did so "Blamelessly". "Blameless" means fully enlightened.

The idea that the commentators were also around at the time and were reading the minds of the monks is clearly indefensible. If this was the case, then Sariputta would have known that the Bhikku in question was "Blameless" as decreed by the Buddha, and would not have worried about that monk as he was already a man perfected. So then we have an unlikely, and untenable alternative position of Sariputta reading the mind of another monk and getting his attainment wrong as the Buddha told Sariputta afterwards that he was "blameless" when he used the knife.

Apologists (commentators) will of course try to make things fit by invoking other non-Buddhavaccana comments like "As he was dying, his mind became free of the defilements, and thus he was blameless then". This is merely a convenient argument based on ideology with no in-text proof whatsoever (and, no...commentary is not proof when it validates itself). This is why I find commentaries nothing more than occasionally helpful footnotes. I do not give it full authority over the Suttas, and where there are discrepancies, the Suttas (for me) always trumps commentaries and Abhidhamma. Any misunderstanding that arises after reading a sutta is usually due to a lack of wisdom rather than a defficiency in the text itself, and hence this means I have more work to do rather than simply agree with a commentary that has no basis or qualification any more than the rambling thoughts of modern-day monks like myself....just another commentator!!!

Hope this helps!
+1 and i would elaborate on the rediculousness of the commentary position on Venerable Channa's story. Truth is indeed that is has not been proclaimed but more than that the view really does not have a footing in a comperhensive understanding, it just doesn't, there is no two ways it can go and one version is as good as the other. One is not-version and burden of proof as Bhante Jag and I have been saying all along, the burden of proof is actually on the commentators.
How to Destroy any addiction
How to Meditate: Satipatthana Mahasi
Медитация Сатипаттхана Випассана
How To Develop Factors of Enlightenment & Perceptions
Complete Manual of Insight by Mahasi Sayadaw
Tyranny of Words - An Introduction to General Semantics
Ledi Sayadaw's Anapana Dipani (Samatha) @ ffmt.fr/articles/maitres/LediS/anapana-dipani.ledi-sayadaw.pdf
Dhammapada @ myweb.ncku.edu.tw/~lsn46/tipitaka/sutta/khuddaka/dhammapada/dhp-contrast-reading/dhp-contrast-reading-en/
don't feed the trolls

User avatar
Dhammarakkhito
Posts: 1115
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:31 am
Contact:

Re: Bhante Jag - Euthanasia

Post by Dhammarakkhito » Mon Feb 19, 2018 7:14 pm

he's rejecting a commentary to support his own
his interpretation isn't proof, he can't rightly appeal to 'no proof' when he doesn't have any either. the text is at least partly ambiguous
"Just as the ocean has a single taste — that of salt — in the same way, this Dhamma-Vinaya has a single taste: that of release."
— Ud 5.5

https://www.facebook.com/noblebuddhadha ... 34/?type=3

http://seeingthroughthenet.net/
https://sites.google.com/site/santipada ... allytaught

User avatar
rightviewftw
Posts: 1310
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 8:50 pm

Re: Bhante Jag - Euthanasia

Post by rightviewftw » Mon Feb 19, 2018 8:58 pm

Dhammarakkhito wrote:
Mon Feb 19, 2018 7:14 pm
he's rejecting a commentary to support his own
his interpretation isn't proof, he can't rightly appeal to 'no proof' when he doesn't have any either. the text is at least partly ambiguous
how is this a motive?

when did disagreement with a position became an agenda? Both positions have an agenda in that case.
Actually burden of proof is on commentator positions. Has been all along, please do explain why it is not so.

It is not a position of his own, there are reasonable people who understand him.
he can't rightly appeal to 'no proof' when he doesn't have any either
actually we can, this is a fairly well established truth. Burden of proof.

your side contradicts the obvious by expanding on what is proclaimed as impossible, you also overcomplicate the arahant suicide Sutta and it is not the most obvious explaination, therefore it is you who have to prove things;

Also best of your Suttas which are not a direct statements and never will be viewed as such are based on the term "paṭiviratō hoti" which is disputed actually.

So you are commentary position arguing against Abhidhamma and Sutta position which you cannot even comperehend.
How to Destroy any addiction
How to Meditate: Satipatthana Mahasi
Медитация Сатипаттхана Випассана
How To Develop Factors of Enlightenment & Perceptions
Complete Manual of Insight by Mahasi Sayadaw
Tyranny of Words - An Introduction to General Semantics
Ledi Sayadaw's Anapana Dipani (Samatha) @ ffmt.fr/articles/maitres/LediS/anapana-dipani.ledi-sayadaw.pdf
Dhammapada @ myweb.ncku.edu.tw/~lsn46/tipitaka/sutta/khuddaka/dhammapada/dhp-contrast-reading/dhp-contrast-reading-en/
don't feed the trolls

justindesilva
Posts: 671
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 12:38 pm

Re: Bhante Jag - Euthanasia

Post by justindesilva » Tue Feb 20, 2018 3:00 am

At the situlpavuva historical site in down south Sri lanka , it is said 12000 arhant monks lived and meditated early nearly before 1000 years. There are stone caves where they lived . During this time a famine came which brought a scarcity of food. It is believed ( vetified from present resident priests) that these arhants too wished and attained nibbana.

User avatar
Dhammarakkhito
Posts: 1115
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:31 am
Contact:

Re: Bhante Jag - Euthanasia

Post by Dhammarakkhito » Tue Feb 20, 2018 5:10 am

what i'm saying here rightview is to me this is a clear case of filling a cognitive bias. the sutta doesn't say the monk was an arahant before he killed himself, all we know is he was an arahant after he attempted suicide and that he said he would be blameless and the buddha said he was blameless. all i know how to do currently is ask you to take a step back and let yourself perceive that there is very much room for the commentators' position. which, btw, i don't care what that position is it is a coincidence as i see it that it accords with my view. i'm also not 100% sold but the way i see it is thus. it's been almost a whole day so i may have repeated a few points. i am not as eager to debate as you are, we are not having a contest just trying to arrive at the truth and on a delicate matter. i dont lack understanding of the monk's position i just dont agree, and i dont value abhidhamma, just as an aside
"Just as the ocean has a single taste — that of salt — in the same way, this Dhamma-Vinaya has a single taste: that of release."
— Ud 5.5

https://www.facebook.com/noblebuddhadha ... 34/?type=3

http://seeingthroughthenet.net/
https://sites.google.com/site/santipada ... allytaught

User avatar
rightviewftw
Posts: 1310
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 8:50 pm

Re: Bhante Jag - Euthanasia

Post by rightviewftw » Tue Feb 20, 2018 5:30 am

Dhammarakkhito wrote:
Tue Feb 20, 2018 5:10 am
what i'm saying here rightview is to me this is a clear case of filling a cognitive bias. the sutta doesn't say the monk was an arahant before he killed himself, all we know is he was an arahant after he attempted suicide and that he said he would be blameless and the buddha said he was blameless. all i know how to do currently is ask you to take a step back and let yourself perceive that there is very much room for the commentators' position. which, btw, i don't care what that position is it is a coincidence as i see it that it accords with my view. i'm also not 100% sold but the way i see it is thus. it's been almost a whole day so i may have repeated a few points. i am not as eager to debate as you are, we are not having a contest just trying to arrive at the truth and on a delicate matter. i dont lack understanding of the monk's position i just dont agree, and i dont value abhidhamma, just as an aside
Actually the Buddha said "Did he not tell you that he was Blameless?" This seemingly invites Sariputta to take position "I think Channa may have lied" and the Sariputta does not take this position.
Why would the Buddha say it like that, think about it... They are Arahants, they do not speak in vain. The Buddha clearly did not confirm a lie there.

Furthermore it is quite the assumption to assume that Channa was not an Aharahnt as Sariputta spent a lot of time questioning him and could not establish that he was not an Arahant, assuming that this Putujhana after having pretended to be an Arahnt with a death wish, this Putujhana having tricked Sariputta then Attains Arahantship. What was the thing you were saying about craving for non-existence? Nor does anybody at any point deny his attainment... I can not imagine you have thought this thru and still believe it.
How to Destroy any addiction
How to Meditate: Satipatthana Mahasi
Медитация Сатипаттхана Випассана
How To Develop Factors of Enlightenment & Perceptions
Complete Manual of Insight by Mahasi Sayadaw
Tyranny of Words - An Introduction to General Semantics
Ledi Sayadaw's Anapana Dipani (Samatha) @ ffmt.fr/articles/maitres/LediS/anapana-dipani.ledi-sayadaw.pdf
Dhammapada @ myweb.ncku.edu.tw/~lsn46/tipitaka/sutta/khuddaka/dhammapada/dhp-contrast-reading/dhp-contrast-reading-en/
don't feed the trolls

User avatar
Dhammarakkhito
Posts: 1115
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:31 am
Contact:

Re: Bhante Jag - Euthanasia

Post by Dhammarakkhito » Tue Feb 20, 2018 6:09 am

ok you are correct, see? it appears to be an intricate sutta with minimal construction. i would read the sutta again but i would rather let it hang around in my subconscious
i would not call disenchantment aversion. can take a look at this sutta:

“To the blameless man
Who is always seeking purity,
Even a hair-tip of evil
Seems the size of a cloud.

I don’t long for death;
I don’t long for life;
I will lay down this body,
Aware and mindful.

I don’t long for death;
I don’t long for life;
I await my time,
Like a worker waiting for their wages.”

https://suttacentral.net/en/thag17.2

really i dont know what i'm talking about, i just read suttas and see how they make me feel. if i dont understand them i will move on. was looking for something else pertinent to the topic, stopped when i came to this not sure if relevant http://www.buddha-vacana.org/sutta/angu ... 0-060.html
"Just as the ocean has a single taste — that of salt — in the same way, this Dhamma-Vinaya has a single taste: that of release."
— Ud 5.5

https://www.facebook.com/noblebuddhadha ... 34/?type=3

http://seeingthroughthenet.net/
https://sites.google.com/site/santipada ... allytaught

User avatar
rightviewftw
Posts: 1310
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 8:50 pm

Re: Bhante Jag - Euthanasia

Post by rightviewftw » Tue Feb 20, 2018 6:28 am

nice find, never seen that passage. Also the ten perceptions, ty
How to Destroy any addiction
How to Meditate: Satipatthana Mahasi
Медитация Сатипаттхана Випассана
How To Develop Factors of Enlightenment & Perceptions
Complete Manual of Insight by Mahasi Sayadaw
Tyranny of Words - An Introduction to General Semantics
Ledi Sayadaw's Anapana Dipani (Samatha) @ ffmt.fr/articles/maitres/LediS/anapana-dipani.ledi-sayadaw.pdf
Dhammapada @ myweb.ncku.edu.tw/~lsn46/tipitaka/sutta/khuddaka/dhammapada/dhp-contrast-reading/dhp-contrast-reading-en/
don't feed the trolls

User avatar
rightviewftw
Posts: 1310
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 8:50 pm

Re: Bhante Jag - Euthanasia

Post by rightviewftw » Tue Feb 20, 2018 9:29 am

Dhammarakkhito wrote:
Tue Feb 20, 2018 6:09 am
i would not call disenchantment aversion. can take a look at this sutta:
I was probably thinking about daughter of Anathapindika. However it is definitely wrong to say that about Arahants, thanks for point it out to me.
"They are disenchanted with suffering" not "averse to it" you are completely right.
How to Destroy any addiction
How to Meditate: Satipatthana Mahasi
Медитация Сатипаттхана Випассана
How To Develop Factors of Enlightenment & Perceptions
Complete Manual of Insight by Mahasi Sayadaw
Tyranny of Words - An Introduction to General Semantics
Ledi Sayadaw's Anapana Dipani (Samatha) @ ffmt.fr/articles/maitres/LediS/anapana-dipani.ledi-sayadaw.pdf
Dhammapada @ myweb.ncku.edu.tw/~lsn46/tipitaka/sutta/khuddaka/dhammapada/dhp-contrast-reading/dhp-contrast-reading-en/
don't feed the trolls

User avatar
Dhammarakkhito
Posts: 1115
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:31 am
Contact:

Re: Bhante Jag - Euthanasia

Post by Dhammarakkhito » Sat Apr 28, 2018 9:27 pm

I don't delight in death, don't delight in living. I await my time like a worker his wage. I don't delight in death, don't delight in living. I await my time mindful, alert.

—Thag 14.1
"Just as the ocean has a single taste — that of salt — in the same way, this Dhamma-Vinaya has a single taste: that of release."
— Ud 5.5

https://www.facebook.com/noblebuddhadha ... 34/?type=3

http://seeingthroughthenet.net/
https://sites.google.com/site/santipada ... allytaught

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], robertk and 44 guests