Page 1 of 4

What is Nirvana?

Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
by SarathW
I am reading a book and found the following interpretation for Nirvana.

Page 29 of:
http://www.dhammaweb.net/books/Dr_Walpo ... Taught.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

An Arahant after his death is often compared to a fire gone out when the
supply of wood is over, or to the flame of a lamp gone out when the wick and oil are
finished. Here it should be clearly and distinctly understood, without any confusion,
that what is compared to a flame or a fire gone out is not Nirvana, but the 'being'
composed of the Five Aggregates who realized Nirvana. This point has to be
emphasized because many people, even some great scholars, have misunderstood
and misinterpreted this simile as referring to Nirvana. Nirvana is never compared to
a fire or a lamp gone out.

Is this how you understand it?

Re: What is Nirvana?

Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:53 am
by santa100
Some idea from a similar thread..

http://www.dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.ph ... 08#p214275" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: What is Nirvana?

Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:55 am
by cooran
:anjali:

This is a very deep subject. I would suggest that you take the time to study:
The Nibbana Sermons
http://Www.seeingthroughthenet.net/file ... tilled.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

With metta
Chris

Re: What is Nirvana?

Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:59 am
by SarathW
Hi Santa
Thanks for the link. You are such a great friend (Kalyana Mitra) since I joined the forum. I like the links specially as I noted that such great answer from forum member called SarathW. It is always easy to said and done it. By the way you must be pretty busy now days by climbing up and down the chimneys’ and distributing toys to kids. :) By the way I wish you and your family a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!

Hi Chris
Thanks for the link. It is not the easiest to read. But I will read it overtime. Your comment on the above link was very helpful.
I think I am like an elephant stuck in the mud because I am trying to interpret the word Nirvana without experience it! Metta.

Re: What is Nirvana?

Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2020 7:30 pm
by cappuccino
Just as… the great ocean is vast, boundless, fills not up for all
of the streams that flow into it. Precisely so Nibbæna is vast,
boundless, fills not up for all of the living beings that pass
thereunto.
Good, Reverend Nægasena! It is even so! I agree absolutely!
from The Questions of King Milinda

Re: What is Nirvana?

Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2020 7:52 pm
by SarathW
the great ocean is vast, boundless, fill not up for all
of the streams that flow into it.
Well. It seems melting of the ice cap seems to fill the ocean!
By the way, it is a different topic.
I wish you a happy new year and thanks for bringing up a good old thread.
:D

Re: What is Nirvana?

Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:52 am
by justindesilva
SarathW wrote: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am I am reading a book and found the following interpretation for Nirvana.

Page 29 of:
http://www.dhammaweb.net/books/Dr_Walpo ... Taught.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

An Arahant after his death is often compared to a fire gone out when the
supply of wood is over, or to the flame of a lamp gone out when the wick and oil are
finished. Here it should be clearly and distinctly understood, without any confusion,
that what is compared to a flame or a fire gone out is not Nirvana, but the 'being'
composed of the Five Aggregates who realized Nirvana. This point has to be
emphasized because many people, even some great scholars, have misunderstood
and misinterpreted this simile as referring to Nirvana. Nirvana is never compared to
a fire or a lamp gone out.

Is this how you understand it?
I clearly remember an explanation of nirvana from the book
The living thoughts of Gautama budda, which states that it is a state of cooling, unoriginated uncreated unborn.
I believe that it is explained as it is because that is what happens when thanha ( desire) does not exist.
Nir- vana is nir being unexisting with vana being desires
( tanha) means a state of no desires.

Re: What is Nirvana?

Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:00 am
by mikenz66
justindesilva wrote: Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:52 am
SarathW wrote: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am I am reading a book and found the following interpretation for Nirvana.
...
Ha, it seems that even in Walpola Rahula's time there were arguments over the fire simile...

I posted this on another thread, but perhaps it is useful here:
mikenz66 wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 2:59 am Bhikkhu Ñānananda has a transcribed talk: Nibbāna and The Fire Simile that discusses some of the issues, in his characteristic direct approach.
https://seeingthroughthenet.net/books/
Ñānananda wrote:According to the Buddha the totality of existence is
comparable to a fire. It is a fire which, as a rule, is dependent on
some fuel or other, which is called 'upādāna' – the term for
grasping as well as for fuel. A fire grasps, grabs, seizes or holds
on to the fuel which it consumes. Its extinction – the proverbial
'going out' – is Nibbāna. For the Buddha, nibbāna is not a
destination after death. The most telling evidence we get is his
lion's roar in the Udumbarika Sãhanāda Sutta.
...
Ñānananda wrote: .... It is this simile of the whirlpool that holds the answer to the
question about the after-death state of the arahant.

The answer is already implicit in the statement: 'The fire
has gone out.' How ridiculous it is to conclude that the fire goes [7]
somewhere when it goes out. If one asks whether the
extinguished fire has gone to the East or West or North or South,
it is a foolish question. If something exists depending on causes
and conditions, when those causes and conditions are removed,
it has to cease. This truth is implicit in the dictum 'bhavanirodho [8]
nibbānam'. 'Cessation of existence is extinction (or Nibbāna).'
The cessation of existence itself is Nibbāna. Apart from this
there is no other Nibbāna. What the Buddha points out to us is
the fact that this Nibbāna is to be realized here and now.

[7] There is a flush of Buddhist literature thriving in the
West which attempts to interpret this fire simile in the
light of the Vedic myth that the extinguished fire 'goes
into hiding'. Though the Buddha succeeded in
convincing the Brahmin interlocutors of the
dependently arisen nature of fire by the reductio-ad-
absurdum method, these scholars seem to be impervious
to his arguments. What is worse, misinterpretations
have even sought refuge in blatant mis-translations of
sacred texts.

[8] The term 'extinction' is anathema to the West in general.
Perhaps as a euphemism, 'extinguishment' might be
'passable'. But rather than playing with the 'fire-simile' it
is better to accept the obvious conclusions, willy nilly.
:heart:
Mike

Re: What is Nirvana?

Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:06 am
by robertk
[7] There is a flush of Buddhist literature thriving in the
West which attempts to interpret this fire simile in the
light of the Vedic myth that the extinguished fire 'goes
into hiding
Did he mention which authors believe this? I am only aware of Thanissaro promoting this idea

Re: What is Nirvana?

Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:26 am
by mikenz66
robertk wrote: Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:06 am
[7] There is a flush of Buddhist literature thriving in the
West which attempts to interpret this fire simile in the
light of the Vedic myth that the extinguished fire 'goes
into hiding
Did he mention which authors believe this? I am only aware of Thanissaro promoting this idea
My impression is that the idea that an Arahant has some sort of existence after the demise of the body is widespread.
Bhikkhu Dhammanando commented on this here in the context of the Thai Forest Ajahns: viewtopic.php?p=329417#p329417

Walpola Rahula's comments suggest that it has a long history...

The passage from Bhikkhu Ñānananda was quoted in the book "Questions and Answers", which is on the https://seeingthroughthenet.net/ website, and is a collection of discussions and letters.

This was in the Bhikkhu Yogānanda section. He gives a couple of quotes (including the ones I gave) and comments:
To appreciate the rebelliousness of these passages and
many others like it, one needs to understand the context in which
they were written. The monastic Sangha in general is quite
dogmatic and traditionalist, not entirely welcoming of
challenging views. When the Nibbāna sermons were delivered at
the Nissarana Vanaya, Bhante Ñāṇananda had the backing of his
teacher, the illustrious Elder Ven. Matara Sri Ñāṇārāma
Mahathera, who not only allowed him the freedom but invited
and encouraged him to express his radical views. Even then he
was criticized by many of his colleagues. Those views were a
main reason that led to Bhante Ñāṇananda’s departure from the
Nissarana Vanaya after the death of Ven. Ñāṇārāma. He left on
his own accord, and set up a small monastery in Devalegama:
Pothgulgala Aranya. It was there that I first met him in November
last year.
His opinion is is clear from the very start of Nibbana, The Mind Stilled, with the translation that he uses at the start of each Sermon:
Etaṃ santaṃ, etaṃ paṇītaṃ, yadidaṃ sabbasaṅkhārasamatho
sabbūpadhipaṭinissaggo taṇhakkhayo virāgo nirodho nibbānaṃ.


"This is peaceful, this is excellent, namely the stilling of all preparations, the
relinquishment of all assets, the destruction of craving, detachment, cessation,
extinction".
From the first Sermon:
At first, for many reasons, I hesitated to accept this invitation for a serious
task, but then, as the venerable Great Preceptor repeatedly encouraged me on
this, I gave some thought as to how best I could set about doing it. And it
occurred to me that it would be best if I could address these sermons directly to
the task before us in this Nissarana Vanaya, and that is meditative attention,
rather than dealing with those deep controversial suttas in academic isolation.
And that is why I have selected the above quotation as the theme for the entire
set of sermons, hoping that it would help create the correct atmosphere of
meditative attention.

Etaṃ santaṃ etaṃ paṇītaṃ, yadidaṃ sabbasaṅkhārasamatho
sabbūpadhipaṭinissaggo taṇhakkhayo virāgo nirodho nibbānaṃ.

"This is peaceful, this is excellent, namely the stilling of all preparations, the
relinquishment of all assets, the destruction of craving, detachment, cessation,
extinction".

This in fact is a meditation subject in itself, a kammaṭṭhāna. This is the
reflection on the peace of Nibbāna, upasamānussati.
:heart:
Mike

Re: What is Nirvana?

Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2020 7:25 am
by sentinel
I remember DD provide sutta saying nibbana is dhatu . The mano perceives nibbana . Therefore , if this is true , then the extinguishing of bhava , the disintegration of five aggregates , does not imply there is No state remains since it is perceivable .

Re: What is Nirvana?

Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2020 8:31 am
by SarathW
Therefore , if this is true , then the extinguishing of bhava , the disintegration of five aggregates , does not imply there is No state remains since it is perceivable .
Is he saying "the disintegration of five aggregates , imply there is a state remains since it is perceivable ."?

Re: What is Nirvana?

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2020 2:12 am
by befriend

Re: What is Nirvana?

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2020 2:20 am
by befriend
It sounds like Ajahn Amaro is saying nibbana is delightful, peace and you keep coming back to it. Maras thinking is craving or aversion when the mind goes out but resting in awareness it starts as just a flash but you shift the paradigm of your life to resting in it. I have noticed this myself and is why I started the awareness as the goal thread, he seems to be confirming what I thought nibbana was just simply coming back to that place free of craving and resting more and more in delightful peacefilled knowing.

Re: What is Nirvana?

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2020 2:21 am
by cappuccino
mikenz66 wrote:
Ñānananda wrote: The cessation of existence itself is Nibbāna.
Nirvana is a dimension

Not annihilation, not existence

Both, neither