Greetings Robert,
Are the suttas actually saying this is the case though, or just "the ancients"?
Because if being a "monk in Sri Lanka" is regarded as no particular grounds for authority, then I wonder how (other than playing favourites) why the weight of authority attributable on that basis is any different for ven. Buddhaghosa?
Metta,
Paul.
Let's make this forum more Buddhist!
- retrofuturist
- Posts: 27848
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:52 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Let's make this forum more Buddhist!
"Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things."
Re: Let's make this forum more Buddhist!
Well it was the Mahavihara and related temples that preserved the canon and Ancient Commentaries. Any recent monk who thinks differently can only be considered someone who is arguing against the ancients. Which is of course fine. But we cant say that what any moderns say should rank with the ones of old.retrofuturist wrote: ↑Mon Jan 15, 2018 4:05 am Greetings Robert,
Are the suttas actually saying this is the case though, or just "the ancients"?
Because if being a "monk in Sri Lanka" is regarded as no particular grounds for authority, then I wonder how (other than playing favourites) why the weight of authority attributable on that basis is any different for ven. Buddhaghosa?
Metta,
Paul.
There are reasons why the monks for millenia kept the old teachings:
IB Horner writes ""The prime object of every Commentary is to make the meanings of the words and
phrases in the canonical passages it is elucidating abundantly clear, definite, definitive even....This is to preserve the Teachings of the Buddha as nearly as possible in the sense intended, and as conveyed by the succession of teachers, acariyaparama. Always there were detractors, always there were and still are "improvers" ready with their own notions. Through friends and enemies alike deleterous change and deterioration in the word of the Buddha might intervene for an indefinite length of time. The Commentaries are the armour and protection against such an eventuality. AS they hold a unique position as preservers and interpreters of true Dhamma, it is essential not only to follow them carefully and adopt the meaning they ascribe to a word or phrase each time they commnet on it. They are as closed now as is the Pali canon. No aditions to their corpus or subtractions from it are to contemplated, and no commentary written in later days could be included in it.""Horner. pxiii Clarifier of the Sweet Meaning" PAli Text Society 1978.
- Dhammarakkhito
- Posts: 1115
- Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:31 am
- Contact:
Re: Let's make this forum more Buddhist!
"Just as the ocean has a single taste — that of salt — in the same way, this Dhamma-Vinaya has a single taste: that of release."
— Ud 5.5
https://www.facebook.com/noblebuddhadha ... 34/?type=3
http://seeingthroughthenet.net/
https://sites.google.com/site/santipada ... allytaught
— Ud 5.5
https://www.facebook.com/noblebuddhadha ... 34/?type=3
http://seeingthroughthenet.net/
https://sites.google.com/site/santipada ... allytaught
- Pseudobabble
- Posts: 938
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:11 am
- Location: London
Re: Let's make this forum more Buddhist!
robertk wrote: ↑Mon Jan 15, 2018 6:17 amWell it was the Mahavihara and related temples that preserved the canon and Ancient Commentaries. Any recent monk who thinks differently can only be considered someone who is arguing against the ancients. Which is of course fine. But we cant say that what any moderns say should rank with the ones of old.retrofuturist wrote: ↑Mon Jan 15, 2018 4:05 am Greetings Robert,
Are the suttas actually saying this is the case though, or just "the ancients"?
Because if being a "monk in Sri Lanka" is regarded as no particular grounds for authority, then I wonder how (other than playing favourites) why the weight of authority attributable on that basis is any different for ven. Buddhaghosa?
Metta,
Paul.
There are reasons why the monks for millenia kept the old teachings:
IB Horner writes ""The prime object of every Commentary is to make the meanings of the words and
phrases in the canonical passages it is elucidating abundantly clear, definite, definitive even....This is to preserve the Teachings of the Buddha as nearly as possible in the sense intended, and as conveyed by the succession of teachers, acariyaparama. Always there were detractors, always there were and still are "improvers" ready with their own notions. Through friends and enemies alike deleterous change and deterioration in the word of the Buddha might intervene for an indefinite length of time. The Commentaries are the armour and protection against such an eventuality. AS they hold a unique position as preservers and interpreters of true Dhamma, it is essential not only to follow them carefully and adopt the meaning they ascribe to a word or phrase each time they commnet on it. They are as closed now as is the Pali canon. No aditions to their corpus or subtractions from it are to contemplated, and no commentary written in later days could be included in it.""Horner. pxiii Clarifier of the Sweet Meaning" PAli Text Society 1978.
I'm not convinced that blind adherence to what was thought previously ought to supersede our own investigation and understanding.
"Does Master Gotama have any position at all?"
"A 'position,' Vaccha, is something that a Tathagata has done away with. What a Tathagata sees is this: 'Such is form, such its origination, such its disappearance; such is feeling, such its origination, such its disappearance; such is perception...such are fabrications...such is consciousness, such its origination, such its disappearance.'" - Aggi-Vacchagotta Sutta
'Dust thou art, and unto dust thou shalt return.' - Genesis 3:19
'Some fart freely, some try to hide and silence it. Which one is correct?' - Saegnapha
"A 'position,' Vaccha, is something that a Tathagata has done away with. What a Tathagata sees is this: 'Such is form, such its origination, such its disappearance; such is feeling, such its origination, such its disappearance; such is perception...such are fabrications...such is consciousness, such its origination, such its disappearance.'" - Aggi-Vacchagotta Sutta
'Dust thou art, and unto dust thou shalt return.' - Genesis 3:19
'Some fart freely, some try to hide and silence it. Which one is correct?' - Saegnapha
-
- Posts: 10186
- Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:32 am
- Location: Andromeda looks nice
Re: Let's make this forum more Buddhist!
One consideration is that Buddhaghosa was historically closer to the original teachings ( 1500 years earlier than contemporary commentators ), which might mean he had a better understanding of what the original teachings intended.retrofuturist wrote: ↑Mon Jan 15, 2018 4:05 am Because if being a "monk in Sri Lanka" is regarded as no particular grounds for authority, then I wonder how (other than playing favourites) why the weight of authority attributable on that basis is any different for ven. Buddhaghosa?
In any case I wouldn't dismiss Buddhaghosa on the basis that his views aren't contemporary, or that his views are somehow "old-fashioned".
Buddha save me from new-agers!
-
- Posts: 10186
- Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:32 am
- Location: Andromeda looks nice
Re: Let's make this forum more Buddhist!
People can be blindly adherent to contemporary views as well.Pseudobabble wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2018 10:26 am I'm not convinced that blind adherence to what was thought previously ought to supersede our own investigation and understanding.
Buddha save me from new-agers!
- Pseudobabble
- Posts: 938
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:11 am
- Location: London
Re: Let's make this forum more Buddhist!
Indeed. My point was only that we each have to strike a good balance between reliance on those who know, and our own sense of what is true.Dinsdale wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2018 11:03 amPeople can be blindly adherent to contemporary views as well.Pseudobabble wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2018 10:26 am I'm not convinced that blind adherence to what was thought previously ought to supersede our own investigation and understanding.
"Does Master Gotama have any position at all?"
"A 'position,' Vaccha, is something that a Tathagata has done away with. What a Tathagata sees is this: 'Such is form, such its origination, such its disappearance; such is feeling, such its origination, such its disappearance; such is perception...such are fabrications...such is consciousness, such its origination, such its disappearance.'" - Aggi-Vacchagotta Sutta
'Dust thou art, and unto dust thou shalt return.' - Genesis 3:19
'Some fart freely, some try to hide and silence it. Which one is correct?' - Saegnapha
"A 'position,' Vaccha, is something that a Tathagata has done away with. What a Tathagata sees is this: 'Such is form, such its origination, such its disappearance; such is feeling, such its origination, such its disappearance; such is perception...such are fabrications...such is consciousness, such its origination, such its disappearance.'" - Aggi-Vacchagotta Sutta
'Dust thou art, and unto dust thou shalt return.' - Genesis 3:19
'Some fart freely, some try to hide and silence it. Which one is correct?' - Saegnapha
Re: Let's make this forum more Buddhist!
I think this is assuming too much individuality and too much feeling threatened (I think threats importantly breed a sense of individuality); and I think this is an implict Abrahamic influence.Pseudobabble wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2018 10:26 amI'm not convinced that blind adherence to what was thought previously ought to supersede our own investigation and understanding.
Take away the threat of eternal damnation, and the whole spiritual quest appears in a new light where neither "blind adherence" nor "one's own investigation and understanding" appear as options, much less as the only two options.
Hic Rhodus, hic salta!
- Pseudobabble
- Posts: 938
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:11 am
- Location: London
Re: Let's make this forum more Buddhist!
I don't quite understand what you mean by this, could you explain further?
"Does Master Gotama have any position at all?"
"A 'position,' Vaccha, is something that a Tathagata has done away with. What a Tathagata sees is this: 'Such is form, such its origination, such its disappearance; such is feeling, such its origination, such its disappearance; such is perception...such are fabrications...such is consciousness, such its origination, such its disappearance.'" - Aggi-Vacchagotta Sutta
'Dust thou art, and unto dust thou shalt return.' - Genesis 3:19
'Some fart freely, some try to hide and silence it. Which one is correct?' - Saegnapha
"A 'position,' Vaccha, is something that a Tathagata has done away with. What a Tathagata sees is this: 'Such is form, such its origination, such its disappearance; such is feeling, such its origination, such its disappearance; such is perception...such are fabrications...such is consciousness, such its origination, such its disappearance.'" - Aggi-Vacchagotta Sutta
'Dust thou art, and unto dust thou shalt return.' - Genesis 3:19
'Some fart freely, some try to hide and silence it. Which one is correct?' - Saegnapha
Re: Let's make this forum more Buddhist!
I'm planning to summarize my thoughts on this and post a thread as soon as I can.Pseudobabble wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2018 1:35 pmI don't quite understand what you mean by this, could you explain further?
But until then --
In the formulation "one's own investigation and understanding", what exactly does "one's own" mean?
Hic Rhodus, hic salta!