Hello.
I recall a sutta where the Buddha states who may rightfully consider themselves to be a disciple of the Buddha.
I've tried to find it myself, but to no avail.
Does anyone know in which sutta this is the topic?
Thank you.
Criteria for who is a disciple of the Buddha - Which sutta?
Criteria for who is a disciple of the Buddha - Which sutta?
Hic Rhodus, hic salta!
Re: Criteria for who is a disciple of the Buddha - Which sut
The Sekha Patipada Sutta addresses the qualities of a Follower of the Buddha - not sure if this is what you mean.
http://buddhasutra.com/files/sekha.htm
With metta,
Chris
http://buddhasutra.com/files/sekha.htm
With metta,
Chris
---The trouble is that you think you have time---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
Re: Criteria for who is a disciple of the Buddha - Which sut
On second thoughts, I think it is the Jivaka Sutta you are looking for:
Jivaka Sutta
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html
With metta,
Chris
Jivaka Sutta
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html
With metta,
Chris
---The trouble is that you think you have time---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
---Worry is the Interest, paid in advance, on a debt you may never owe---
---It's not what happens to you in life that is important ~ it's what you do with it ---
Re: Criteria for who is a disciple of the Buddha - Which sut
Thank you, but it's not these two.
The one I have in mind is using some heavy words, something to the effect of "And if you ever, even just for a moment, fail to keep in line with the Dhamma, you're not worthy calling yourself a disciple of the Buddha."
The one I have in mind is using some heavy words, something to the effect of "And if you ever, even just for a moment, fail to keep in line with the Dhamma, you're not worthy calling yourself a disciple of the Buddha."
Hic Rhodus, hic salta!
- Goofaholix
- Posts: 4017
- Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 3:49 am
- Location: New Zealand
Re: Criteria for who is a disciple of the Buddha - Which sut
Looking at that wording I would imagine that would disqualify anyone who wasn't fully awakened.binocular wrote:The one I have in mind is using some heavy words, something to the effect of "And if you ever, even just for a moment, fail to keep in line with the Dhamma, you're not worthy calling yourself a disciple of the Buddha."
Pronouns (no self / not self)
“Peace is within oneself to be found in the same place as agitation and suffering. It is not found in a forest or on a hilltop, nor is it given by a teacher. Where you experience suffering, you can also find freedom from suffering. Trying to run away from suffering is actually to run toward it.”
― Ajahn Chah
“Peace is within oneself to be found in the same place as agitation and suffering. It is not found in a forest or on a hilltop, nor is it given by a teacher. Where you experience suffering, you can also find freedom from suffering. Trying to run away from suffering is actually to run toward it.”
― Ajahn Chah
Re: Criteria for who is a disciple of the Buddha - Which sut
Dear binocular,
I don't recall ever seeing anywhere in the suttas where it is explained directly. From my understanding, the numerous examples of people going for refuge at the end of many suttas is the beginning of discipleship.
From there, I assume those people would try to live their lives according to the Dhamma as far as they are willing.
It sounds like you may be speaking of a sutta I've never read before which is a possibility given that I haven't read nearly enough suttas yet.
I don't recall ever seeing anywhere in the suttas where it is explained directly. From my understanding, the numerous examples of people going for refuge at the end of many suttas is the beginning of discipleship.
-MN 72"Magnificent, Master Gotama! Magnificent! Just as if he were to place upright what was overturned, to reveal what was hidden, to show the way to one who was lost, or were to carry a lamp into the dark so that those with eyes could see forms, in the same way has Master Gotama — through many lines of reasoning — made the Dhamma clear. I go to Master Gotama for refuge, to the Dhamma, and to the Sangha of monks. May Master Gotama remember me as a lay follower who has gone to him for refuge, from this day forward, for life."
From there, I assume those people would try to live their lives according to the Dhamma as far as they are willing.
It sounds like you may be speaking of a sutta I've never read before which is a possibility given that I haven't read nearly enough suttas yet.
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa
Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa
Re: Criteria for who is a disciple of the Buddha - Which sut
It's in a tone similar to AN 2.23:Goofaholix wrote:Looking at that wording I would imagine that would disqualify anyone who wasn't fully awakened.binocular wrote:The one I have in mind is using some heavy words, something to the effect of "And if you ever, even just for a moment, fail to keep in line with the Dhamma, you're not worthy calling yourself a disciple of the Buddha."
"Monks, these two slander the Tathagata. Which two? He who explains what was not said or spoken by the Tathagata as said or spoken by the Tathagata. And he who explains what was said or spoken by the Tathagata as not said or spoken by the Tathagata. These are two who slander the Tathagata."
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html
When you consider the things that are nowadays popularly ascribed to having been said by the Buddha (e.g. http://sourcesofinsight.com/buddha-quotes/), according to this sutta, many if not most of these things are to be counted as slandering the Buddha.
Hic Rhodus, hic salta!
Re: Criteria for who is a disciple of the Buddha - Which sut
"
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.htmlMonks, even if bandits were to savagely sever you, limb by limb, with a double-handled saw, even then, whoever of you harbors ill will at heart would not be upholding my Teaching.
Re: Criteria for who is a disciple of the Buddha - Which sut
SN 55.40 wrote:"Lord, the disciple of the noble ones in whom the factors of stream entry are altogether & in every way lacking: Is he called a disciple of the noble ones who lives heedlessly?"
"Nandiya, the person in whom the factors of stream entry are altogether & in every way lacking I call an outsider, one who stands in the faction of the run-of-the-mill. But as to how a disciple of the noble ones lives heedlessly and heedfully, listen well and pay attention, I will speak."
- "And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting oneself one protects others? By the pursuit, development, and cultivation of the four establishments of mindfulness. It is in such a way that by protecting oneself one protects others.
"And how is it, bhikkhus, that by protecting others one protects oneself? By patience, harmlessness, goodwill, and sympathy. It is in such a way that by protecting others one protects oneself.
- Sedaka Sutta [SN 47.19]
Re: Criteria for who is a disciple of the Buddha - Which sut
Thank you for the suggestions!
On a related note, there is what I find a peculiar formulation in the Patoda Sutta -
"Then again there is the case where an excellent thoroughbred horse is not stirred & agitated on seeing the shadow of the goad-stick, or when his coat is pricked, or when his hide is pricked, but when his bone is pricked [with the goad stick] he is stirred & agitated, [thinking,] 'I wonder what task the trainer will have me do today? What should I do in response?' Some excellent thoroughbred horses are like this. And this is the fourth type of excellent thoroughbred horse to be found existing in the world.
- as if a horse is still an "excellent thoroughbred horse" even if he has to be hit to the bone to become alert to the horse trainer. I think most people would not consider such a horse to be an "excellent thoroughbred horse", but a lazy one.
This one is close.robertk wrote:"http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.htmlMonks, even if bandits were to savagely sever you, limb by limb, with a double-handled saw, even then, whoever of you harbors ill will at heart would not be upholding my Teaching.
So it appears that even a person who lives as heedlessly as described above, would still count as a disciple of the noble ones.daverupa wrote:SN 55.40 wrote:"Lord, the disciple of the noble ones in whom the factors of stream entry are altogether & in every way lacking: Is he called a disciple of the noble ones who lives heedlessly?"
"Nandiya, the person in whom the factors of stream entry are altogether & in every way lacking I call an outsider, one who stands in the faction of the run-of-the-mill. But as to how a disciple of the noble ones lives heedlessly and heedfully, listen well and pay attention, I will speak."
On a related note, there is what I find a peculiar formulation in the Patoda Sutta -
"Then again there is the case where an excellent thoroughbred horse is not stirred & agitated on seeing the shadow of the goad-stick, or when his coat is pricked, or when his hide is pricked, but when his bone is pricked [with the goad stick] he is stirred & agitated, [thinking,] 'I wonder what task the trainer will have me do today? What should I do in response?' Some excellent thoroughbred horses are like this. And this is the fourth type of excellent thoroughbred horse to be found existing in the world.
- as if a horse is still an "excellent thoroughbred horse" even if he has to be hit to the bone to become alert to the horse trainer. I think most people would not consider such a horse to be an "excellent thoroughbred horse", but a lazy one.
Hic Rhodus, hic salta!
Re: Criteria for who is a disciple of the Buddha - Which sut
Binocular, what is your point? What are you trying to prove? That to be a follower of the Buddha is very very difficult and that you are part of the elite? Well, that's not gonna happen
As several has pointed out, a follower of the Buddha is one who follow the five precepts, and take refuge in the Triple Gem, like it or not.
As several has pointed out, a follower of the Buddha is one who follow the five precepts, and take refuge in the Triple Gem, like it or not.
Re: Criteria for who is a disciple of the Buddha - Which sut
I take the point there to be that the horse is nevertheless trainable. I believe the Buddha's compassion was such that he did not exclude anyone who was trainable, even those who need harsher prodding. Nevertheless, there are some the Buddha considered untrainable. In my opinion, this would be someone who is really going to lengths to be obstinately closed minded to the Buddha's teachings.binocular wrote: On a related note, there is what I find a peculiar formulation in the Patoda Sutta -
"Then again there is the case where an excellent thoroughbred horse is not stirred & agitated on seeing the shadow of the goad-stick, or when his coat is pricked, or when his hide is pricked, but when his bone is pricked [with the goad stick] he is stirred & agitated, [thinking,] 'I wonder what task the trainer will have me do today? What should I do in response?' Some excellent thoroughbred horses are like this. And this is the fourth type of excellent thoroughbred horse to be found existing in the world.
- as if a horse is still an "excellent thoroughbred horse" even if he has to be hit to the bone to become alert to the horse trainer. I think most people would not consider such a horse to be an "excellent thoroughbred horse", but a lazy one.
Although I'd say there are examples in the suttas of those who certainly seemed completely convinced of their opposition to the Buddha (Saccaka for example), only to be converted by the Buddha's skillful means, so we probably shouldn't be too sure of who isn't ultimately able to accept the teachings.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html
More on the training of horses here:
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka ... .than.html
"When one thing is practiced & pursued, ignorance is abandoned, clear knowing arises, the conceit 'I am' is abandoned, latent tendencies are uprooted, fetters are abandoned. Which one thing? Mindfulness immersed in the body." -AN 1.230
Re: Criteria for who is a disciple of the Buddha - Which sut
Thoroughbred doesn't automatically imply diligence or laziness. It only means "high potential". Even for people, you'll see someone who is extremely bright and capable but lacks the motivation, some isn't so bright but works really hard, some has both, some has neither..binocular wrote: ..I think most people would not consider such a horse to be an "excellent thoroughbred horse", but a lazy one.
Re: Criteria for who is a disciple of the Buddha - Which sut
The phrase was "excellent thoroughbred", not just "thoroughbred."santa100 wrote:Thoroughbred doesn't automatically imply diligence or laziness. It only means "high potential". Even for people, you'll see someone who is extremely bright and capable but lacks the motivation, some isn't so bright but works really hard, some has both, some has neither..binocular wrote: ..I think most people would not consider such a horse to be an "excellent thoroughbred horse", but a lazy one.
I don't see how the second part of the Patoda Sutta fits with the first one.kirk5a wrote:I take the point there to be that the horse is nevertheless trainable. I believe the Buddha's compassion was such that he did not exclude anyone who was trainable, even those who need harsher prodding. Nevertheless, there are some the Buddha considered untrainable. In my opinion, this would be someone who is really going to lengths to be obstinately closed minded to the Buddha's teachings.
Each part per se makes sense to me, but the comparison eludes me.
Hic Rhodus, hic salta!
Re: Criteria for who is a disciple of the Buddha - Which sut
So? that still gives no ground to automatically associate with diligence or laziness. The most you can conclude is "excellent potential". That's all.binocular wrote: The phrase was "excellent thoroughbred", not just "thoroughbred."